Cyclization of Functionalized Aminophosphonates
A R T I C L E S
the contribution of various parameters on the geometries,
energies, and the reaction outcome, the reaction route was
modeled in different environments: in the gas phase, with
transmetalation with sodium or lithium as the counterion, and
finally with inclusion of solvent interactions. The theoretical
results are correlated with the experimental data.
From a theoretical point of view the stabilization of allylic
anions by phosphorus substituents has attracted considerable
interest.12-19 The review of Katritzky20 on the regioselectivity
of reactions of heteroatom-stabilized allylic anions with elec-
trophiles presents both experimental and theoretical consider-
ations on this item. Unsymmetrically substituted allyl anions
can react with electrophiles both intra- or intermolecularly at
two sites, making these species of considerable importance. An
early theoretical work on the stabilization of allylic anions by
heteroatom-containing subgroups was presented by Denmark
and Cramer where neutral, anionic, and lithiated P-allyl and
P-methylphosphonic diamides were discussed.16
proved to be the key structural feature of this class of antibiotics.
Furthermore, increasing resistance is a major threat in hospitals
and in the community29 and is mainly caused by the emergence
and spread of â-lactamases, which are â-lactam-deactivating
enzymes evolutionarily related to penicillin-binding proteins
(PBPs).30-33 Therefore, current research is focusing on new
functionalized â-lactams having â-lactamase-inhibiting activity
or combining antibacterial activity with enhanced stability
toward â-lactamases.34,35 In addition to these well-known
antibacterial properties, â-lactams have also found application
in inhibiting serine proteases. Members of this major class of
enzymes are involved in numerous physiological processes
including protein turnover, digestion, blood coagulation and
wound healing, fertilization, cell differentiation and growth, cell
signaling, the immune response, and apoptosis.36,37
2. Experimental and Calculation Methods
1
General. H NMR spectra were recorded at 300 MHz with CDCl3
as solvent and tetramethylsilane (TMS) as internal standard. 13C NMR
spectra were recorded at 75 MHz and 31P NMR spectra at 121 MHz.
MS spectra were measured using electron spray ionization (4000 V).
THF was dried and distilled over sodium (benzophenone ketyl control).
The absolute value of the coupling constants (J) in Hz and assignments
Recently, Pratt and co-workers performed several advanced
calculations on the aggregation states of lithium carbenoids in
the gas phase and in ethereal solvent.21 From a methodological
point of view, this work deserves attention as it incorporates
the effects of the metallic cation which is further embedded in
solution. It was explicitly shown that charge-separated species
may be dramatically stabilized by solvent interactions. Pratt,
Vaˇn Nguˇyˆen, and Ramachandran have additionally studied the
performance of various electronic structure methods for the
accurate reproduction of barrier heights for lithium enolates.22
Recently, in a theoretical study performed by Ando, the origin
of π-facial stereoselectivity in the alkylation of enolates was
investigated.23 In this study, the effects of the counterion, explicit
coordination of solvent molecules with the lithium ion, and bulk
solvent effects were found to be important for the reaction
mechanism and energetics. Bearing this in mind, it is necessary
to evaluate the influence of each of these effects on the reaction
outcome for the present study.
1
of H and 13C peaks were determined using COSY, HSQC, HMBC,
and DEPT experiments.
Typical Procedure for the Synthesis of Phosphono-â-lactams 4.
A NaH suspension [0.24 g (6 mmol, 1.2 equiv)] in mineral oil is washed
three times with petroleum ether to remove the oil, and 15 mL of dry
THF is added. Then, 5 mmol of the corresponding N-chloroacetyl amino
alkenylphosphonate 1 in 5 mL of THF is added dropwise, and the
reaction mixture is refluxed for 2 or 3 h protected from moisture with
a CaCl2 tube. After cooling, the mixture is poured into 25 mL of water
and extracted with 20 mL of diethyl ether. The remaining water phase
is then washed two times with 10 mL of diethyl ether. The combined
organic phases are dried with MgSO4. The â-lactams are obtained in
good purity after filtration and evaporation of the solvent. Further
purification can be performed using column chromatography.
Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Calculations. All ab initio calculations
were carried out with the GAUSSIAN 03 software package.38 Density-
functional theory (DFT) methods39 have been shown to be more efficient
than wave function based procedures such as highly correlated post-
Hartree-Fock methods due to their excellent cost-to-performance ratio.
Despite the importance of phosphorus compounds in chemistry, only
limited levels of theory studies were conducted on such elements. The
work of Leyssens and Peeters addresses the accuracy of various post-
The main motivation for studying the remarkable selectivity
of the ring-closure reaction lies in the pharmaceutical importance
of the â-lactam ring as part of several important antibiotics,
including penicillin.24 Also some electron-deficient monocyclic
â-lactams appeared to be very active, including the commercially
available azthreonam,25-28 in which the â-lactam heterocycle
(12) Schleyer, P. V.; Clark, T.; Kos, A. J.; Spitznagel, G. W.; Rohde, C.; Arad,
D.; Houk, K. N.; Rondan, N. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 6468-
6475.
(13) Streitwieser, A., Jr.; Rajca, A.; McDowell, R. S.; Glaser, R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1987, 109, 4184-4188.
(27) Gordon, E. M.; Ondetti, M. A.; Pluscec, J.; Cimarusti, C. M.; Bonner, D.
P.; Sykes, R. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 6053-6060.
(28) Brogden, R. N.; Heel, R. C. Drugs 1986, 31, 96-130.
(29) Neu, H. C. Science 1992, 257, 1064-1073.
(14) Denmark, S. E.; Dorow, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 864-866.
(15) Denmark, S. E.; Dorow, R. L. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5926-5928.
(16) Denmark, S. E., Cramer, C. J. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 1806-1813.
(17) Kranz, M.; Denmark, S. E. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5867-5877.
(18) Koch, R.; Anders, E. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 5861-5866.
(19) (a) Leyssens, T.; Peeters, D. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2004, 673, 79-
86. (b) Leyssens, T.; Peeters, D. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2004, 686,
71-82.
(30) Bulychev, A.; Massova, I.; Miyashita, K.; Mobashery, S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 7619-7625.
(31) Golemi, D.; Maveyraud, L.; Vakulenko, S.; Tranier, S.; Ishiwata, A.; Kotra,
L. P.; Samama, J.-P.; Mobashery, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6132-
6133.
(32) Meroueh, S. O.; Minasov, G.; Lee, W.; Shoichet, B. K.; Mobashery, S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9612-9618.
(20) Katritzky, A. R.; Piffl, M.; Lang, H. Y.; Anders, E. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99,
665-722.
(33) Fisher, J. F.; Meroueh, S. O.; Mobashery, S. Chem. ReV. 2005 105, 395-
424.
(21) Pratt, L. M.; Streitwieser, A. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2830-2838.
(22) Pratt, L. M.; Vaˇn Nguˇyˆen, N.; Ramachandran, B. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
4279-4283.
(34) Sandanayaka, V. P.; Prashad, A. S. Curr. Med. Chem. 2002, 9, 1145-
1165.
(35) Hammond, M. L. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 53, Suppl. S2, ii7-ii9.
(36) Bonneau, P. R.; Hasani, F.; Plouffe, C.; Malenfant, E.; LaPlante, S. R.;
Guse, I.; Ogilvie, W. W.; Plante, R.; Davidson, W. C.; Hopkins, J. L.;
Morelock, M. M.; Cordingley, M. G.; Deziel, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999,
121, 2965-2973.
(23) Ando, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3964-3972.
(24) Du¨rckheimer, W.; Blumbach, J.; Lattrell, R.; Scheunemann, K. H. Angew.
Chem. 1985, 24, 180-202.
(25) Imada, A.; Kitano, K.; Kintaka, K.; Muroi, M.; Asai, M. Nature 1981,
289, 590-591.
(37) Powers, J. C.; Asgian, J. L.; Ekici, O. D.; James, K. E. Chem. ReV. 2002,
102, 4639-4750.
(38) Frisch, M. J.; et al. Gaussian 03; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
(39) Example of a reference work: Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. Density-Functional
Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Oxford University Press: New York, 1989.
(26) Sykes, R. B.; Cimarusti, C. M.; Bonner, D. P.; Bush, K.; Floyd, D. M.;
Georgopapadakou, N. H.; Koster, W. H.; Liu, W. C.; Parker, W. L.;
Principe, P. A.; Rathnum, M. L.; Slusarchyk, W. A.; Trejo, W. H.; Wells,
J. S. Nature 1981, 291, 489-491.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 26, 2006 8469