C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Table 2. Direct Aldol Reactions of Acetone with Aldehydes by
Chiral Organic Catalyst 3da
A theoretical study of transition structures demonstrates the
important role of the terminal hydroxyl group in the catalyst in the
stereodiscrimination. Our results suggest a new strategy in the
design of new organic catalysts for direct asymmetric aldol reactions
and related transformations because plentiful chiral resources
containing multi-hydrogen bond donors, for example, peptides,
might be adopted in the design. Research on such a strategy is now
underway.15
entry
product
R
yield (%)b
ee (%)c
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
4j
4k
4l
4m
4n
4j
4-NO2Ph
4-BrPh
4-ClPh
2-ClPh
Ph
R-naphthyl
â-naphthyl
4-MePh
3-NO2Ph
c-C6H11
i-Pr
t-Bu
n-Pr
n-Bu
c-C6H11
c-C6H11
66
77
75
83
51
76
93
48
63
85
43
51
17
12
77
48
93
90
93
85
83
81
84
84
87
Acknowledgment. We are grateful for financial support from
the National Natural Science Foundation of China. We also thank
Prof. Benjamin List at the Scripps Research Institute for his
generosity in providing the HPLC conditions for determining the
enantiomeric excess of the aldol reaction.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
NMR data for compounds 1-3, HPLC spectra of 4a-c and 4j-l, GC
spectra of 4m,n, and Cartesian coordinates of TS1 and TS2 (PDF).
This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
97
98
>99
87d
86d
98e
98f
4j
References
a The reaction was carried out in neat acetone with a concentration of
0.5 M at -25 °C for 24-48 h (see Supporting Information). b Isolated yields.
c Determined by HPLC. d Determined by GC. e Catalyzed by 10 mol % 3d.
f Catalyzed by 5 mol % 3d.
(1) For reviews, see: (a) Carreira, E. M.; Mukaiyama Aldol Reaction. In
ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis; Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A.,
Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, 1999; Vol. III, Chapter
29.1. (b) Mahrwald, R. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 1095. (c) Gro¨ger, H.; Vogl,
E. M.; Shibasaki, M. Chem.-Eur. J. 1998, 4, 1137. (d) Johnson, J. S.;
Evans, D. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 325. (e) Machajewski, T. D.;
Wong, C.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 1352.
(2) (a) Trost, B. M. Science 1991, 254, 1471. (b) Trost, B. M. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 259.
(3) (a) Yamada, Y. M. A.; Yoshikawa, N.; Sasai, H.; Shibasaki, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1871. (b) Yamada, Y. M. A.; Shibasaki,
M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5561. (c) Yoshikawa, N.; Yamada, Y. M.
A.; Das, J.; Sasai, H.; Shibasaki, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4168.
(d) Kumagai, N.; Matsunaga, S.; Yoshikawa, N.; Ohshima, T.; Shibasaki,
M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1539.
(4) (a) Trost, B. M.; Ito, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12003. (b) Trost,
B. M.; Ito, H.; Silcoff, E. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3367. (c)
Trost, B. M.; Silcoff, E. R.; Ito, H. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2497.
(5) For reviews, see: (a) Gro¨ger, H.; Wilken, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001,
40, 529. (b) Jarvo, E. R.; Miller, S. J. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 2481. (c)
Dalko, P. I.; Moisan, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3726.
(6) (a) List, B.; Lerner, R. A.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 2395. (b) Sakthivel, K.; Notz, W.; Bui, T.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5260. (c) Notz, W.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 7386.
Figure 2. The calculated transition structure of the aldol reaction of
benzaldehyde with acetone catalyzed by 3d. The geometries were optimized
with the HF/6-31G* method. The relative energies (kcal/mol) are with HF/
6-31G* in ( ) and B3LYP/6-31G** in [ ].
(7) (a) List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9336. (b) Bui, T.; Barbas, C.
F., III. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6951. (c) Co`rdova, A.; Notz, W.;
Zhong, G.; Betancort, J. M.; Barbas, C. F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 1842. (d) Kumaragurubaran, N.; Juhl, K.; Zhuang, W.; Bøgevig, A.;
Jørgensen, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 6254. (e) List, B. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5656. (f) Bøgevig, A.; Juhl, K.; Kumaragurubaran,
N.; Zhuang, W.; Jørgensen, K. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1790.
(g) Northrup, A. B.; MacMillan, D. W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
6798. (h) Co`rdova, A.; Watanabe, S.; Tanaka, F.; Notz, W.; Barbas, C.
F., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1866. For reviews, see: (i) List, B.
Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 5573. (j) List, B. Synlett 2001, 1675.
(8) Ooi, T.; Taniguchi, M.; Kameda, M.; Maruoka, K. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2002, 41, 4542.
(9) A poor yield of 6% with 70% ee for 4a and a trace amount of 4j were
observed with aldol reactions catalyzed by 20 mol % L-proline under the
described reaction conditions (acetone, -25 °C) for 48 h.
(10) List, B.; Pojarliev, P.; Castello, C. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 573.
(11) All calculations were performed with the Gaussian 98 program.
(12) (a) Arno, M.; Domingo, L. R. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2002, 108, 232. (b)
Rankin, K. N.; Gauld, J. W.; Boyd, R. J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106,
5155. (c) Bahmanyar, S.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 11273.
(d) Bahmanyar, S.; Houk, K. N.; Martin, H. J.; List, B. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 2475. (e) Hoang, L.; Bahmanyar, S.; Houk, K. N.; List,
B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 16.
(13) For studies on hydrogen bonds acting like Lewis acid, see: (a) Huang,
Y.; Rawal, V. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9662. (b) Schreiner, P.
R.; Wittkopp, A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 217. (c) Vachal, P.; Jacobsen, E. N.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 10012.
(14) Poor enantioselectivity of 31% ee was observed with 3d when the reaction
of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde with acetone was carried out in the presence of
water (acetone:H2O ) 1:1) at room temperature, which demonstrates that
the hydrogen bond exists in the transition state (see ref 6b).
(15) Dipeptide Pro-Thr-Me catalyzes the direct asymmetric aldol reaction of
4-nitrobenzaldehyde with acetone in 69% ee at room temperature.
It is noteworthy that the enantioselectivity of 98% ee was still
provided for 4j even with 5 mol % 3d (entry 16).
Theoretical calculations have been carried out to understand the
high enantioselectivity.11 As shown in Figure 2, the best transition
structures for the reaction of benzaldehyde with acetone are similar
to those with proline as the catalyst,12 except that here both the
amide and the hydroxyl groups are hydrogen-bonded with the
aldehyde to serve as the Lewis acid.13,14 The hydroxyl group appears
to be the better hydrogen-bond donor as indicated by the shorter
hydrogen bond. The two phenyl groups of the hydroxylamine are
in equatorial positions. TS1, which leads to the formation of the
major product observed experimentally, is found to be much more
stable than TS2. The phenyl group of benzaldehyde in TS1 does
not have steric interactions with anything. On the other hand, the
phenyl group of benzaldehyde in TS2 has a severe steric interaction
with the hydroxyl group (H- - -H distance is only about 2.14 Å).
The CdO- - -H(O) angle must open up to reduce the steric
interaction.
In summary, we have presented the first successful example of
using L-proline amino alcohol amides as catalysts for highly
enantioselective direct aldol reactions of aldehydes with neat
acetone. Catalyst 3d, prepared from L-proline and (1S,2S)-diphenyl-
2-aminoethanol, exhibits high enantioselectivities of up to 93% ee
for aromatic aldehydes and up to >99% ee for aliphatic aldehydes.
JA034528Q
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 18, 2003 5263