treated with one-carbon ylide to furnish olefin 27 in 70% yield
over two steps. The PMB ether was deprotected with 2,3-
dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone (DDQ) to furnish
required secondary alcohol 9 in 81% yield.
Scheme 3: Reagents and conditions: (a) NaH, BnBr, THF, 0 °C-rt, 4
h, 86%; (b) (1) (COCl)2, DMSO, TEA, CH2Cl2, -78 °C; (2)
̶
Ph3P+CH3I , K tOBu, THF, 0 °C-rt, 2 h, 74% over two steps; (c) AD-
mix-β, MeSO2NH2, t-BuOH/H2O, 0 °C, 24 h, 84%; (d) TBSCl,
Imidazole, DCM, 0 oC to rt, 4 h, 85%; (e) MOMCl, DIPEA, DCM, 0
o
oC to rt 8 h, 96%; (f)TBAF, THF, 0 C to rt 3 h, 86%; (g) IBX,
DMSO/DCM, rt, 1 h.
Scheme 1: Retrosynthetic analysis of compound 1.
Scheme 2: Reagents and conditions: (a) (R,R)-salen-CoIIIOAc
o
catalyst, AcOH, Toluene, 0 C-rt, 24 h, 46%; (b) TMSacetylene, n-
BuLi, BF3.OEt2, THF, -78 oC, 3 h, 80%; (c) PMBCl, DIPEA, 150 oC,
4 h, 82%; (d) K2CO3, MeOH, rt, 5 h, 86%.
o
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) n-BuLi, -78 C, 2 h, 79%
o
over two steps; (b) TBSCl, Imidazole, DCM, 0 C to rt, 12 h, 90%;
The synthesis of aldehyde 11 was started from commercially
available 1,4-butane diol 14 (Scheme 3). Accordingly, l,4 -butane
diol was selectively mono protected as its benzyl ether using
BnBr, NaH in THF to provide 18 in 80% yield. Alcohol present
in 18 was oxidized by using Swern oxidation condition {(COCl)2,
DMSO, TEA, CH2Cl2, -78 °C} to provide the corresponding
aldehyde which was added to a one-carbon ylide (prepared from
(c)Raney-Ni, H2, EtOH, 12 h, 92%; (d) (1) IBX, DMSO/ DCM, rt,
(2) Ph3P+CH3I , KtOBu, 0 °C-rt, 2 h, 70% over two steps; (e) DDQ,
̶
DCM:H2O(19:1), NaHCO3, rt, 1 h, 81%.
Having synthesized aliphatic fragment 9 then we turned our
attention to synthesize another coupling partner 8 which was
prepared from commercially available 3,5-dimethoxybenzoic
acid 10 (Scheme 5). Treatment of compound 10 with LAH in
THF provided the alcohol 28 in 92% yield. Oxidation of
compound 28 with PCC furnished corresponding aldehyde
followed by the addition to one carbon ylide to furnish the
compound 29 in 74% yield which was further treated with POCl3
to give corresponding aldehyde 30 in 82% yield. Oxidation of
compound 30 with Pinnick oxidation13 conditions to furnish the
required acid fragment 8 in 75% yield.
+
CH3PPh3 I-, KtOBu in THF) to afford olefin 19 in 74% yield
over two steps. Exposure of the compound 19 to Sharpless
asymmetric dihydroxylation conditions11 using AD-mix-β
produced the required diol 20 in 84% yield. The primary alcohol
was protected as its TBS ether by treatment with TBSCl and
imidazole to furnish 21 in 85% yield. Protection of the free
hydroxy group as its MOM ether was achieved by treating
compound 21 with Hunig’s base and MOMCl in CH2Cl2 to
furnish 22 in 96% yield. Deprotection of the TBS group in
compound 22 was achieved by using TBAF to furnish alcohol 23
in 86% yield which was oxidized with IBX to furnish
corresponding aldehyde 11.
With 11 in hand, we next focused our attention on the completion
of 9 via an alkynyl addition to the aldehyde moiety (Scheme 4).
Treatment of the compound 12 with n-BuLi provided the lithium
alkynyl nucleophile which smoothly underwent addition to the
aldehyde 11 to furnish the desired diastereomeric alcohol 24 in
79% yield12 (over two steps). The secondary alcohol present in 24
would be converted into keto functionality in the later stage of
the synthesis. Alcohol 24 was then protected as its TBS ether
using TBSCl/Imidazole to furnish the compound 25 in 90%
yield. One pot alkyne reduction as well as benzyl deprotection
was achieved by using Raney-Ni under hydrogen atmosphere to
provide compound 26 in 92% yield. The primary alcohol was
then oxidized to corresponding aldeyde with IBX which was then
o
Scheme 5: Reagents and conditions: (a) LAH, THF, 0 C - rt, 4 h,
92%; (b) (1) PCC, DCM, rt, 2 h, (2) Ph3P+CH3I , K OBu, 0 °C-rt, 2
h, 74% over two steps; (c) POCl3, dry DMF,0 oC to rt, 8 h, 82%; (d)
NaClO2, NaH2PO4, 2-methyl-2-butene, THF/t BuOH/H2O (3:3:1), rt,
4 h, 75%.
̶
t