Published on Web 08/26/2006
Synthesis and Evaluation of Bioorthogonal Pantetheine
Analogues for in Vivo Protein Modification
Jordan L. Meier, Andrew C. Mercer, Heriberto Rivera, Jr., and Michael D. Burkart*
Contribution from the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UniVersity of California,
San Diego, 9500 Gilman DriVe, La Jolla, California 92093-0358
Received May 8, 2006; E-mail: mburkart@ucsd.edu
Abstract: In vivo carrier protein tagging has recently become an attractive target for the site-specific
modification of fusion systems and new approaches to natural product proteomics. A detailed study of
pantetheine analogues was performed in order to identify suitable partners for covalent protein labeling
inside living cells. A rapid synthesis of pantothenamide analogues was developed and used to produce a
panel which was evaluated for in vitro and in vivo protein labeling. Kinetic comparisons allowed the
construction of a structure-activity relationship to pinpoint the linker, dye, and bioorthogonal reporter of
choice for carrier protein labeling. Finally bioorthogonal pantetheine analogues were shown to target carrier
proteins with high specificity in vivo and undergo chemoselective ligation to reporters in crude cell lysate.
The methods demonstrated here allow carrier proteins to be visualized and isolated for the first time without
the need for antibody techniques and set the stage for the future use of carrier protein fusions in chemical
biology.
domain down to just 11 amino acids,7 offering a fusion tag of
the size and flexibility to be competitive with contemporary
Introduction
Recent years have seen intense research effort focused toward
the development of new methods for the study and manipulation
of covalently modified proteins, with particular attention given
to in vivo methodologies.1 Fluorescent protein fusions2 and
antibody conjugates3 provide powerful tools for protein imaging
and manipulation. However drawbacks of these methods, such
as structural perturbations sometimes induced by large fusions
and general membrane impermeability of antibodies, have lead
researchers to devise methods for the site-specific modification
of proteins by small-molecule probes. Ideally these probes
should be low molecular weight, covalent in nature, and
possessed of fluorescence or affinity properties allowing for
facile imaging and manipulation. We recently introduced one
such technique, demonstrating cellular uptake and covalent
modification of carrier protein fusions by pantetheine analogues.4
These coenzyme A (CoA) precursors were shown to penetrate
the cell membrane and be transformed into fully formed CoA
derivatives via the endogenous CoA metabolic pathway, where-
upon they were transferred to a carrier protein by the promiscu-
ous phosphopantetheinyltransferase (PPTase; E.C. 2.7.7.7) Sfp
(Figure 2). This advance allows carrier protein labeling, a
technique first developed from cell lysates5 and since demon-
strated on the cell surface,6 to be performed within the cell,
opening the door for more sophisticated labeling systems. Recent
developments have seen the trimming of the carrier protein
tagging systems and further highlighting the importance of
techniques for the labeling of intracellular carrier proteins.
Several strategies for site-specific labeling of proteins in vivo
have been previously demonstrated. Examples include Bertozzi’s
manipulation of the sialic acid biosynthetic pathway for the
introduction of keto and azido functionalized cell-surface
glycoproteins,8 Cravatt’s introduction of azido/alkyne function-
alities by covalent irreversible inhibition of protein active sites,9
and Hsieh-Wilson’s chemoenzymatic introduction of a keto-
functionality for capture of O-GlcNAc-modified proteins.10 In
each of these examples the protein is not directly labeled with
a fluorescence or affinity tag, but rather a unique and biologi-
cally inert chemical functionality is introduced. This functional-
(5) (a) La Clair, J. J.; Foley, T. L.; Schegg, T. R.; Regan, C. M.; Burkart, M.
D. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 195-201. (b) Yin, J.; Liu, F.; Li, X.; Walsh, C.
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 7754-7755. (c) Yin, J.; Liu, F.; Schinke,
M.; Daly, C.; Walsh, C. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13570-13571.
(6) (a) George, N.; Pick, H.; Vogel, H.; Johnsson, N.; Johnsson, K. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8896-8897. (b) Yin, J.; Lin, A. J.; Buckett, P. D.;
Wessling-Resnick, M.; Golan, D. E.; Walsh, C. T. Chem. Biol. 2005, 12,
999-1006. (c) Vivero-Pol L.; George, N.; Krumm, H.; Johnsson, K.;
Johnsson, N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12770-12771.
(7) Yin, J.; Straight, P. D.; McLoughlin, S. M.; Zhou, Z.; Lin, A. J.; Golan, D.
E.; Kelleher, N. L.; Kolter, R.; Walsh, C. T. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2005, 102, 15815-15820.
(8) (a) Mahal, L. K.; Yarema, K. J.; Bertozzi, C. R. Science 1997, 276, 1125-
1128. (b) Yarema, K. J.; Mahal, L. K.; Bruehl, R.; Rodriguez, E. C.;
Bertozzi, C. R. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 31168-31179. (c) Saxon, E.;
Bertozzi, C. R. Science 2000, 287, 2007-2010.
(9) (a) Speers, A. E.; Cravatt, B. F. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 535-546. (b) Speers,
A. E.; Adam, G. C.; Cravatt, B. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4686-
4687. (c) Alexander, J. P.; Cravatt, B. F. Chem Biol. 2005, 12, 1179-
1187.
(1) Bertozzi, C. R.; Prescher, J. A. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2005, 1, 13-21.
(2) (a) Tsien, R. Y. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 1998, 67, 509-544. (b) Lippincott-
Schwartz, J.; Patterson, G. H. Science 2003, 300, 87-91.
(3) (a) Fritze, C. E.; Anderson, T. R. Methods Enzymol. 2000, 327, 3-16. (b)
Massoud, T. F.; Gambhir, S. S. Genes DeV. 2003, 17, 545-580.
(4) Clarke, K. M.; Mercer, A. C.; La Clair, J. J.; Burkart, M. D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 11234-11235.
(10) (a) Hwan-Ching, T.; Khidekel, N.; Ficarro, S. B.; Peters, E. C.; Hsieh-
Wilson, L. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 10500-10501. (b) Khidekel,
N.; Ficarro, S. B.; Peters, E. C.; Hsieh-Wilson, L. C. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 36, 13132-13137.
9
12174
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 2006, 128, 12174-12184
10.1021/ja063217n CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society