V. Anuradha et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 14 (2006) 6820–6826
6825
Table 3. Analgesic activity effect of Ochna squarrosa crude extract and compounds in Swiss mice by tail-flick method
Treatment
Dose (mg/kg)
Percent analgesia (min)
120
30
60
90
150
180
Control
Diclofenac sodium 20
Tween 80, 1%
3.03 ( 0.03)
28.00 ( 0.07)
57.49** ( 0.98) 75.39** ( 0.65) 73.15** ( 1.68)
18.91** ( 0.90) 30.88** ( 0.33) 57.52** ( 0.09) 69.11** ( 1.09)
24.65** ( 1.38)
77.92** ( 0.07) 73.12** ( 0.07) 74.88** ( 01.0)
5.79 ( 0.03)
39.5** ( 0.13)
9.09 ( 0.03)
7.5 ( 0.05)
5.3 ( 0.02)
2.2 ( 0.02)
51.5** ( 0.09) 71.36** ( 0.13) 51.36** ( 0.11) 24.77** ( 0.05)
1
25
25
25
25
72.7** ( 1.57) 24.16** ( 0.79)
22.77 ( 1.04)
3.8 ( 0.58)
15.05 ( 0.34)
2
3
Crude extract
31.35 ( 0.41) 66.02** ( 0.73) 57.53** ( 0.85) 40.41** ( 0.73) 16.57** ( 0.78)
45.6 ( 0.03) 44.45** ( 0.30) 21.76** ( 0.32)
Significance levels **p < 0.01 compared with respective control Tween 80, 1% (ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test). Each value represents SE
(n = 6).
Compound
vone]. Mp 282 ꢁC. IR (KBr) mmax 3414, 2924, 618,
1149, 1024, 770, 604 cmꢀ1 1H NMR (300 MHz,
Me2CO-d6) 6.70 (1H, s, H-3), 6.88 (1H, d,
2:
[30,40-dihydroxyfurano[400,500,6,7]fla-
5.3.2. Anti-inflammatory activity. Anti-inflammatory
activity was evaluated by carrageenan-induced paw
oedema test in rats.13 Diclofenac sodium 20 mg/kg
was administered as a standard for comparison and
test compounds, extract at dose level of 25 mg/kg
were administered orally. The paw volume was mea-
sured using the mercury displacement technique with
the help of plethysmograph immediately before and
30 min, 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after carrageenan injection.
The percent inhibition of paw oedema was
calculated.
.
d
J = 8.8 Hz, H-50), 7.12 (1H, dd, J = 1.2 Hz, 2.7 Hz,
H-300), 7.42 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-20), 7.44 (1H, dd,
J = 8.4 Hz, 2.4 Hz, H-60), 8.00 (1H, d, J = 1.2 Hz,
H-8), 8.12 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-200), 8.30 (1H, s, H-
5). 13C NMR (75 MHz, Me2CO-d6) d 101.0 (C-8),
104.3 (C-3), 107.8 (C-300), 113.9 (C-10), 116.6 (C-
20), 117.9 (C-5), 119.5 (C-60), 120.7 (C-50), 122.2
(C-10), 126.4 (C-6), 147.6 (C-30), 149.3 (C-200), 150.4
(C-40), 154.1 (C-9), 157.4 (C-7), 164.1 (C-2),
177.7(C@O). HRESIMS m/z [M++H] 295.0602, calcd
295.0606.
5.3.3. Analgesic activity. Test for analgesic activity was
performed by tail-flick technique14,15 using Wistar albi-
no mice (25–30 g) of either sex selected by random sam-
pling technique. Diclofenac sodium 20 mg/kg was
administered as a standard for comparison and test
compounds, extract at dose level of 25 mg/kg were
administered orally. The reaction time was recorded at
30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min after treatment, cut-
off time was 10 s. The percent analgesic activity was
calculated.
Compound 3: [Lophirone L] mp 262 ꢁC [a]D ꢀ6.4ꢁ (c 1;
EtOH) IR (KBr) mmax 3384, 2949, 1632, 1454, 1022,
631 cmꢀ1 1H NMR (200 MHz, Me2CO-d6) d 4.72
.
(1H, dd, J = 8 Hz, 2 Hz, H-a), 5.42 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz,
1.2 Hz, H-b), 6.08 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-30), 6.10 (1H,
dd, J = 8 Hz, 2 Hz, H-50), 6.80 (2H, d, J = 8 Hz, H-3,
5), 7.38 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, H-60), 7.40 (2H, d, J = 8 Hz,
H-2, 6), 12.50 (1H, s, –OH) 13C NMR (75 MHz,
Me2CO-d6) d 58.7 (C-a), 83.8 (C-b), 103.1 (C-30), 108.0
(C-50), 113.9 (C-10), 115.6 (C-3, 5), 128.6 (C-2, 6),
131.4 (C-1), 132.4 (C-60), 157.3 (C-4), 164.9 (C-20),
165.7 (C-40), 201.4 (C@O). HRESIMS m/z [M+ꢀH]
527.1341, calcd 527.1342.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Dr. J. S. Yadav, Director, IICT, for
his encouragement and support during the course of this
work.
5.2. Synthetic procedures
References and notes
General procedure for the debenzylation of benzyl
ethers: To a solution of benzyl ether (1.0 g, 2.5 mmol)
in trigol was added iodine (0.46 g, 3.75 mmol) and re-
fluxed for 2 h at 120 ꢁC. After completion of the reac-
tion, the reaction mixture was treated with hypo
solution and extracted with ethyl acetate (3·50 ml),
dried and concentrated. The product obtained was puri-
fied using column chromatography. The fractions eluted
at 30% ethyl acetate in petroleum ether contained pure
hydroxy compound.
1. The Wealth of India. Vol. VII, Raw materials, CSIR, New
Delhi, 1975, 76.
2. Kirtikar, K. R.; Basu, B. D. Indian Medicinal Plants;
Periodical book agency: Vivek vihar, New Delhi, India,
1980, p. 515.
3. Danielson, K. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1992, 30, 359–360.
4. Ahok, K. K.; Bhan, M. K.; Dhar, K. L. Phytochemistry
1978, 17, 1441–1442.
5. Reddy, K. C.; Kumar, K. A.; Srimannarayana, G.
Phytochemistry 1983, 22, 800–801.
6. Messanga, B. B.; Ghogomu Tih, R.; Kimbu, S. F.;
Sondengam, B. L.; Martin, M. T.; Bodo, B. J. Nat. Prod.
1992, 55, 245–248.
5.3. Biological assay procedures
7. Ghogomu, R.; Sondengam, B. L.; Martin, M. T.; Bodo, B.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 2967–2968.
8. Ghogomu Tih, R.; Sondengam, B. L.; Martin, M. T.;
Bodo, B. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 2289–2293.
9. Goel, A.; Dixit, M. Synlett 2004, 1990–1994.
5.3.1. Animals. The animals were procured from the
National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, India, and
were maintained in colony cages at 25 2 ꢁC; they were
fed standard animal feed.