C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Alginate Trisaccharide 21a
HW40 gel filtration afforded deprotected trisaccharide 21 in 35%
yield over the three steps.
In summary, a facile synthesis route toward â-linked mannuronic
acids is presented. The carboxylic ester function in the mannuronic
acid donors sufficiently influences the electronic environment
around the anomeric center to allow good to excellent â-selectivities
in Ph2SO/Tf2O and NIS/TMSOTf mediated glycosylation events.
Further research is devoted to the synthesis of extended â-
mannuronic acid oligomers, the development of a similar strategy
to the assembly of all types of alginate oligomers, and the biological
evaluation of these compounds.
a Reagents and conditions: (a) Lev2O, pyridine, rt, 86%; (b) 3-azido-
propanol, Ph2SO, Tf2O, TTBP, DCM, -75 °C to rt, 80% (R/â ) 1/5); (c)
cat. NaOMe, MeOH, rt, 60%; (d) NIS, TMSOTf, 0 °C, 2 h, 18: 78% (R/â
) 1/>10), 20: 50% (R/â ) 1/>10); (e) N2H4‚H2O, pyridine/AcOH (4/1),
rt, 95%; (f) N2H4‚H2O, pyridine/AcOH (4/1), rt then KOH, THF/H2O (1/
1) then H2, Pd(black), MeOH/AcOH (10/1), 35%.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the Council
for Chemical Sciences of The Netherlands Organization for
Scientific Research (CW-NWO). The authors thank C. Erkelens
and F. Lefeber for recording NMR spectra. H. van den Elst is kindly
acknowledged for technical assistance.
4, and NIS in dichloromethane was cooled to -40 °C and a catalytic
amount of TMSOTf was added to afford â-disaccharide 8 in 91%
yield. In another experiment, donor 1 was preactivated with NIS
and an equimolar amount of TMSOTf.15a However, no complete
activation of donor 1 could be attained as monitored by TLC
analysis. After addition of acceptor 4, the â-linked disaccharide 8
was isolated in the same yield (91%). These results suggest that,
contrary to the Ph2SO/Tf2O conditions, the donor is not transformed
into an R-triflate intermediate. Presumably, direct SN2-type dis-
placement of the initially formed iodosulfonium species is at the
basis of the observed â-selectivities in the NIS/TMSOTf mediated
glycosylation reactions. The standard NIS/TMSOTf protocol was
also applied for the condensation of donor 1 and benzylidene
protected acceptor 5 to give â-linked disaccharide 11 in 58% yield.
Partial cleavage of the acid labile benzylidene functionality explains
this moderate yield. Finally, the earlier unproductive coupling of
acceptor 7 with donor 1 was executed using NIS/TMSOTf.
Disaccharide 13 was isolated in excellent yield as a mixture of
anomers (R/â ) 1/2), probably as a result of the sterical bias in
the acceptor.
The stage was now set for the assembly of the spacer containing
mannuronic acid trisaccharide 21 using the NIS/TMSOTf activation
system (Scheme 1). Levulinoylation of compound 14 using Lev2O
in pyridine afforded donor 15 in excellent yield. The requisite
acceptor 17 was synthesized under Ph2SO/Tf2O mediated conditions
of 1 with 3-azidopropanol, affording fully protected 16 in 80% yield
as an inseparable mixture of anomers.16 Ensuing basic hydrolysis
of the acetate ester using NaOMe/MeOH delivered the target
â-linked acceptor 17 in 60% yield. It was found that hydrolysis of
the â-anomer 16â occurred much faster than hydrolysis of the
corresponding R-oriented anomer 16R, leading to facile separation
of the anomers. Donor 15 and acceptor 17 were subjected to the
NIS/TMSOTf mediated condensation, giving â-linked disaccharide
18 in 78% yield. Standard deprotection of the levulinoyl group using
hydrazine hydrate yielded acceptor disaccharide 19, which was
subjected to the same coupling cycle giving trisaccharide 20 in 50%
yield. Deprotection of the mannuronic acid trisaccharide 20 was
accomplished following levulinoyl deprotection, hydrolysis of the
methyl ester, and final reduction of the azide and benzyl groups.
Supporting Information Available: All general procedures, the
synthesis and characterizations of all new compounds. This material is
References
(1) Moe, S. T.; Draget, K. I.; Skjak-Braek, G.; Smidsrød, O. In Food
Polysaccharides and Their Applications; Stephen, A. M., Ed.; Marcel
Dekker: New York, 1995; pp 245-286.
(2) (a) Flo, T. H.; Ryan, L.; Latz, E.; Takeuchi, O.; Monks, B. G.; Lien, E.;
Halaas, O.; Akira, S.; Skjak-Braek, G.; Golenbock, D. T.; Espevik, T. J.
Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 35489-35495. (b) Iwamoto, M.; Kurachi, M.;
Nakashima, T.; Kim, D.; Yamaguchi, K.; Oda, T.; Iwamoto, Y.;
Muramatsu, T. I. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 4423-4429.
(3) (a) Janeway, C. A.; Medzhitov, R. Annu. ReV. Immunol. 2002, 20, 197-
216. (b) Rich, T. Toll and Toll-Like Receptors: An Immunologic
PerspectiVe; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York, 2005.
(4) For a review on â-mannoside synthesis, see: El Ashry, E. S. H.; Rashed,
N.; Ibrahim, E. S. I. Curr. Org. Synth. 2005, 2, 175-213.
(5) (a) Crich, D.; Sun, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 8321-8348. (b) Crich, D.;
Sun, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 435-436. (c) Crich, D.; Smith, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9015-9020.
(6) Crich, D.; Chandrasekera, N. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5386-
5389.
(7) Jensen, H. H.; Nordstrøm, M.; Bols, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
9205-9213.
(8) (a) Srivastava, V. K.; Schuerch, C. Carbohydr. Res. 1980, 79, C13-C16.
(b) Srivastava, V. K.; Schuerch, C. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 1121-1126.
(c) Crich, D.; Hutton, T. K.; Banerjee, A.; Jayalath, P.; Picione, J.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 105-119.
(9) van den Bos, L. J.; Code´e, J. D. C.; van der Toorn, J. C.; Boltje, T. J.;
van Boom, J. H.; Overkleeft, H. S.; van der Marel, G. A. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 2165-2168.
(10) (a) van den Bos, L. J.; Litjens, R. E. J. N.; van den Berg, R. J. B. H. N.;
Overkleeft, H. S.; van der Marel, G. A. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2007-2010.
(b) Code´e, J. D. C.; van den Bos, L. J.; Litjens, R. E. J. N.; Overkleeft,
H. S.; van Boom, J. H.; van der Marel, G. A. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1947-
1950.
(11) See Supporting Information for the synthesis of uronates 1, 2, and 3.
(12) Recently, Demchenko and co-workers proposed the possibility of remote
participation from the C4 position: De Meo, C.; Kamat, M. N.;
Demchenko, A. V. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 706-711.
(13) Crich, D.; Cai, W.; Dai, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 1291-1297.
(14) Veeneman, G. H.; van Leeuwen, S. H.; van Boom, J. H. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1990, 31, 1331-1334.
(15) (a) Crich, D.; De la Mora, M.; Vinod, A. U. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68,
8142-8148. (b) Code´e, J. D. C.; Stubba, B.; Schiattarella, M.; Overkleeft,
H. S.; van Boeckel, C. A. A.; van Boom, J. H.; van der Marel, G. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3767-3773.
(16) Addition of the 3-azidopropanol acceptor to the activated donor at
-75 °C substantially increases â-selectivity compared to adding the
acceptor at -50 °C (R/â ) 1/1, 76%).
JA064787Q
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 40, 2006 13067