lipase B)4 was very efficient at 60 °C,4a leading to (S)-(+)-1
alcohol and (R)-(+)-1-phenylprop-2-yn-1-yl acetate ((R)-2)
in up to 99% ee. Furthermore, acetylation of (S)-1 afforded
(S)-2, whereas hydrolysis of (R)-2 gave (R)-1 quantitatively.
Therefore, any stereoisomer of alcohol 1 or acetate 2 can be
obtained with high ee.
Table 1. Additions of (R)-2 to Aldehydes
Next, we focused our attention on the addition of 1 to
aldehydes. In 2000, Carreira et al. reported an efficient
enantioselective Zn-mediated addition of alkynes to alde-
hydes.5 Shortly thereafter, we extended this methodology to
alkynols.6 Based on these studies, we have explored the
addition of (R)-1 to cyclohexancarbaldehyde by using
commercially available Zn(OTf)2 (zinc triflate), (-)-N-
methylephedrine (NME), and Et3N in toluene (Scheme 2).
a 76% based on recovered starting material.
Scheme 2. Alkyne Addition
As result, a valuable matched case was observed for a
Felkin-Ahn addition to the protected lactaldehyde leading
to anti,anti-4d (Figure 1). More remarkably, Ley’s butane-
2,3-diacetal-protected glyceraldehyde proved to be an excel-
lent group in terms of reactivity and selectivity for both type
of additions (syn and anti).9
Since the reaction leading to diol syn-3a showed low
conversion (37% of recovered alkyne 1) and moderate
selectivity, we turned our attention to the corresponding
acetylated alkyne (R)-2. To our delight, alkynol syn-4a was
obtained in 94% yield and >99:1 dr7 in the addition of (R)-2
to cyclohexancarbaldehyde in the presence of (-)-NME.
Furthermore, the use of (+)-NME led to the anti isomer
(anti-4a) in 71% yield (Table 1).
As shown in Table 1, similar results were noted in the
addition of (R)-2 to a set of aldehydes. It should be mentioned
that the dominant stereochemical control was provided by
the NME employed (compare entries 2 and 3, or 6 and 7, in
Table 1) leading to >25:1 dr, with the resident stereogenic
center of 2 or of aldehyde playing a subordinate role.
The last entries in Table 1 concerning protected lactalde-
hyde and glyceraldehyde8 deserve special attention since the
good results suggested that highly polyhydroxylated species
could be obtained with a judicious choice of the stereochem-
istry of the aldehyde, the alkyne, and the NME (Figure 1).
To assess this assumption, we explored further additions to
such aldehydes using (S)-2.
Figure 1. Carreira’s additions to chiral aldehydes.
Keeping in mind the metal-catalyzed [3,3]-sigmatropic
rearrangement of allylic acetates,10 we then explored the
chirality transfer from the benzylic position (via B in Scheme
1). These rearrangements usually occur under thermody-
namical control and the more stable allylic acetate predomi-
nates (Scheme 3). Our hypothesis was that the conjugation
of the double bond to the phenyl group might shift the
equilibrium to the allylic acetate II.
(3) Prepared by addition of lithium acetylide to benzaldehyde: Mortier,
J.; Vaultier, M.; Carreaux, F.; Douin, J.-M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3515.
(4) (a) Xu, D.; Li, Z.; Ma, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 6343. (b)
Raminelli, C.; Comasseto, J. V.; Andrade, L. H.; Porto, A. L. M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 3117.
(5) (a) Frantz, D. E.; Fa¨ssler, R.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 1806. (b) Anand, N. K.; Carreira, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
9687.
(6) (a) Amador, M.; Ariza, X.; Garcia, J.; Ortiz, J. Tetrahedron Lett.
2002, 43, 2691. For propargyl acetate additions, see also: (b) El-Sayed,
E.; Anand, N. K.; Carreira, E. M. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3017.
(7) Determined by HPLC analysis.
(8) (a) Michel, P.,; Ley, S. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 3898.
(b) Michel, P.; Ley, S. V. Synthesis 2004, 147.
(9) Boyer, J.; Allenbach, Y.; Ariza, X.; Garcia, J.; Georges, Y.; Vicente,
M. Synlett 2006, 1895.
(10) For recent stereoselective applications, see: (a) Trost, B. M.; Lee,
C. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3687. (b) Saito, S.; Kuroda, A.;
Matsunaga, H.; Ikeda S. Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 13919.
4502
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 20, 2006