604
H. R.Darabi et al. · Interesting Behavior of Acetone under the Willgerodt-Kindler Reaction Conditions
Scheme 5.
used. A 60 m×0.25 mm column packed with WCOT fused
silica CP-sil 5CB was employed. The carrier gas was helium
Scheme 6.
and the inlet pressure was 14 psi.
Caution: Experiments should be carried out in an efficient
hood to avoid exposure to noxious vapors of hydrogen sul-
fide.
Preparation of enamine 5: 1.16 g (20 mmol) of acetone
was warmed with 3.48 g (40 mmol) of morpholine in 50 ml
of DMF at 30 ◦C for 8 h. When the mixture was analyzed by
We conclude that formation of 4 should pass
through the formation of intermediate 8. This result
supports our suggested reaction pathway. The proba-
ble pathway of this reaction is outlined in Schemes 4
and 5.
In contrast to 3, when 2 was subjected to the similar GC-MS, it was found to consist of acetone (10%) in addition
to the expected enamine 5 (65%).
reaction conditions, a mixture of products 2 and 4 was
formed. Therefore, we found that existence of hydro-
gen(s) on α-carbon at least on one side of the carbonyl
group is necessary not only to promote the reaction
but also to reduce the carbonyl group to a methylene
group. While reduction of imines 7 or 8 in the pres-
ence of hydrogen sulfide may give products 2 and 4,
their oxidation by water leads to formation of prod-
ucts 1 and 3. Therefore, attack on α-carbon is com-
mon to this reaction. Hydrogen sulfide can be produced
from the morpholine/sulfur mixtures [21]. As shown
in Scheme 5, the reduction of the iminium ion 7 or 8
to the methylene group can occur by the exothermic
desulfurization of C=S group with H2S in the presence
of amines [19]. The results show that at any time sub-
sequent to formation of enamine 5, the initial attack at
the α-carbon could occur.
Reaction of enamine 5 with sulfur and morpholine: 1.27 g
(10 mmol) of enamine 5 was heated with 1.28 g of sulfur
(40 mmol) and 4.35 g (50 mmol) of morpholine in 50 ml of
DMF at 80 ◦C for 1 h. The products 2 and 4 were formed as
determined by GC-MS.
Preparation of 1: Acetone (0.58 g, 10 mmol) was heated
with sulfur (0.6◦4 g, 20 mmol) and morpholine (1.74 g,
20 mmol) at 20 C for 8 h. The reaction was monitored by
GC showing 71% yield. The reaction mixture was purified by
flash chromatography on silica gel using hexane-ether (1:1)
and gave pure product 1 in 67% yield. M.p. 149 – 151 ◦C. –
1H NMR (90 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.46 (s, 3H), 3.65 (m, 6H),
4.20 (d, 2H). – MS (EI): m/z (%) = 173 (15) [M+], 130 (30),
115 (15), 86 (45), 43 (100).
Preparation of 2: A mixture of 0.58 g (10 mmol) of ace-
tone and 1.60 g (50 mmol) of sulfur and 3.12 g (40 mmol) of
morpholine in 10 ml of DMF was exposed to microwave irra-
diation for 5 min. The reaction was monitored by GC show-
ing 82% yield. The reaction mixture was purified by flash
chromatography on silica gel using hexane-ether (2:1) and
gave pure product 2 in 76% yield [16].
Preparation of 3: A mixture of acetone (0.58 g, 10 mmol)
and sulfur (1.60 g, 50 mmol) and morpholine (3.12 g,
40 mmol) in presence of a trace amount of water was ex-
posed to microwave irradiation for 5 min. The reaction was
monitored by GC showing 73% yield. The product was pu-
rified by flash chromatography on silica gel using ether as
eluent to afford 3 as a yellow solid. After recrystallization
from ethanol, the pure product 3 was obtained in 55% yield.
In conclusion, we optimized the one-pot synthesis
of products 1 – 3 from acetone together with the de-
velopment of a general mechanism of the Willgerodt-
Kindler reaction.
Experimental Section
Morpholine was purified by refluxing for 24 h over
sodium and distillation. Anhydrous acetone and purified sul-
fur was used. A GC-MS method for the analysis of mixtures
was applied; a Fisions instruments gas chromatograph 8000
connected to a mass detector (Trio 1000) with 70 EV was
[1] A. Padwa, L. Scott Beall, T. M. Heidelbaugh, B. Liu,
S. M. Sheehan, J. Org. Chem. 65, 2684 (2000).
[2] P. J. May, M. Bradley, D. C. Harrowven, D. Pallin,
Tetrahedron Lett. 41, 1627 (2000).
[3] D. C. Harrowven, M. C. Lucas, P. D. Howes, Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 40, 4443 [1999].
[4] P. Metzner, Synthesis 1185 (1992).
Unauthenticated
Download Date | 6/22/16 7:23 AM