C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
agreement with the presumed mechanism of cytochrome P450 in
which a low-spin FeIII-OO(H) leads to O-O cleavage and
formation of a high-valent FedO intermediate. In SOR, a high-
spin Fe3+-OO(H) intermediate with a weak Fe-O bond could favor
H2O2 release rather than O-O bond cleavage.2
The vibrational signatures of intermediates 2a and 2b show that
these FeIII-OOR species exhibit weak Fe-O bonds, in sharp
contrast with the data from other low-spin FeIII-OOR complexes.
The weaker Fe-O bonds in 2 may be due to a trans effect from
the sulfur ligand, provided it is coordinated trans and not cis to the
peroxide.9 The sulfur ligand is believed to remain coordinated to
the iron in 2 since preliminary experiments with substituted
arylthiolate ligands show shifted transient absorption maxima (data
not shown). Interestingly, recent DFT calculations have determined
that a low-spin FeIII-OOH intermediate should be energetically
favored for SOR.2a Our results support these predictions and the
possibility of a low-spin intermediate with a weak Fe-O bond in
Figure 2. UV-vis spectra of 1 (black, dashed line) and 2a (blue, solid
line) in CH2Cl2 at -80 °C, and RR spectra of 16O-2a (A) and 18O-2a
(B). The 16O-18O difference spectrum (C, green) is overlapped with a
simulated trace composed of Gaussian peaks (C, red).
Table 1. Spin States and Vibrational Data for FeIII-OOR Species
-
the course of O2 reduction by SOR.
spin
νFe
νO
-
-
(cm-
O
O
1
Acknowledgment. We thank the NIH for financial support
(D.P.G., GM62309; P.M.L., GM074785). W.D.K. is grateful for a
Dreyfus Environmental Postdoctoral Fellowship. We thank K. D.
Karlin for the use of his low-temperature UV-vis instrumentation.
1
complex
statea
)
(cm-
)
ref
[FeIII([15]aneN4)(SPh)(OOtBu)]+
[FeIII([15]aneN4)(SPh)(OOCm)]+
[FeIII(TPA)(OHx)(OOtBu)]x+
[FeIII(L8py2)(SAr)(OOtBu)]+
LS
LS
LS
HS
612
615
696
623
803
795
796
b
b
7f
2d
830, 874
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, EPR
spectra, RR data, and X-ray structure files for 1 (CIF). This material is
a LS ) low-spin (S ) /2); HS ) high-spin (S ) /2). b This work.
1
5
(Figures 2A and S2-A). Intermediate 2b displays similar frequencies
at 430, 490, 615, and 795 cm-1 (Figure S2-B). On the basis of
earlier studies,7 signals below 500 cm-1 can be assigned to (C-
C-C) and (C-C-O) deformation modes of the alkylperoxo ligand.
The bands at 803 and 795 cm-1 are within the expected range of
O-O stretching vibrations in metal-alkylperoxo complexes, and
they compare well with other low-spin FeIII-OOR species (Table
1). In contrast, O-O stretching modes from high-spin FeIII-OOR
species are higher in energy, as seen in Table 1. RR bands at 612
cm-1 for 2a and 615 cm-1 for 2b are consistent with Fe-O
stretching vibrations, but they are dramatically lower in energy than
those observed for low-spin FeIII-OOR adducts.2d,7
To confirm these assignments, intermediate 2a was prepared with
tBu18O18OH. The RR spectrum of 18O-labeled 2a is shown in Figure
2B (middle), along with the 18O-16O difference spectrum. The ν-
(Fe-18O) is observed at 584 cm-1 which represents a 28 cm-1 18O-
downshift. The ν(18O-18O) is downshifted 46 cm-1 and splits as a
Fermi doublet centered at 757 cm-1 (Figure 2B). These 18O-shifts
are in complete agreement with those expected for isolated Fe-O
and O-O diatomic oscillators. In contrast, vibrations observed
below 500 cm-1 show only marginal 18O-shifts, consistent with
their assignment to alkyl C-C-C and C-C-O deformation modes
(Figure S3). The perfect match between observed 18O-shifts and
predicted values for isolated diatomics supports an analysis of the
observed ν(Fe-O) and ν(O-O) frequencies as group vibrations
and permits correlations between vibrational frequencies and bond
strengths.
References
(1) (a) Kurtz, D. M., Jr. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 902-908. (b) Mathe´, C.;
Nivie`re, V.; Houe´e-Levin, C.; Mattioli, T. A. Biophys. Chem. 2006, 119,
38-48. (c) Clay, M. D.; Yang, T. C.; Jenney, F. E., Jr.; Kung, I. Y.;
Cosper, C. A.; Krishnan, R.; Kurtz, D. M., Jr.; Adams, M. W. W.;
Hoffman, B. M.; Johnson, M. K. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 427-438. (d)
Yeh, A. P.; Hu, Y.; Jenney, F. E., Jr.; Adams, M. W. W.; Rees, D. C.
Biochemistry 2000, 39, 2499-2508.
(2) (a) Silaghi-Dumitrescu, R.; Silaghi-Dumitrescu, I.; Coulter, E. D.; Kurtz,
D. M., Jr. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 42, 446-456. (b) Clay, M. D.; Cosper, C.
A.; Jenney, F. E., Jr.; Adams, M. W. W.; Johnson, M. K. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100, 3796-3801. (c) Kovacs, J. A. Chem. ReV.
2004, 104, 825-848. (d) Bukowski, M. R.; Halfen, H. L.; van den Berg,
T. A.; Halfen, J. A.; Que, L., Jr. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 584-
587.
(3) Theisen, R. M.; Kovacs, J. A. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 1169-1171.
(4) Addison, A. W.; Rao, T. N.; Reedjik, J.; van Rijn, J.; Verschoor, G. C. J.
Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1984, 1349-1456.
(5) (a) Fiedler, A. T.; Halfen, H. L.; Halfen, J. A.; Brunold, T. C. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1675-1689. (b) For examples of related zinc(II)
complexes, see: Notni, J.; Gorls, H.; Anders, E. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem.
2006, 1444-1455.
(6) Krishnamurthy, D.; Sarjeant, A.; Goldberg, D. P.; Caneschi, A.; Totti,
F.; Zakharov, L. N.; Rheingold, A. L. Chem.sEur. J. 2005, 11, 7328-
7341 and references therein.
(7) (a) Menage, S.; Wilkinson, E. C.; Que, L., Jr.; Fontecave, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 203-205. (b) Zang, Y.; Kim, J.; Dong, Y. H.;
Wilkinson, E. C.; Appelman, E. H.; Que, L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997,
119, 4197-4205. (c) Wada, A.; Ogo, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Mukai, M.;
Kitagawa, T.; Jitsukawa, K.; Masuda, H.; Einaga, H. Inorg. Chem. 1999,
38, 3592-3593. (d) Girerd, J. J.; Banse, F.; Simaan, A. J. Struct. Bonding
2000, 97, 145-177. (e) Lehnert, N.; Ho, R. Y. N.; Que, L., Jr.; Solomon,
E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 12802-12816. (f) Lehnert, N.; Ho, R.
Y. N.; Que, L., Jr.; Solomon, E. I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8271-
8290. (g) Lehnert, N.; Fujisawa, K.; Solomon, E. I. Inorg. Chem. 2003,
42, 469-481.
(8) Quantitation of the low-spin EPR signal reveals that it accounts for 10-
30% of the starting iron(II) complex. This relatively low value is likely
due to decay of the FeIII-OOR species during the manual mixing time in
the EPR tube. In contrast, the UV-vis spectra for 2 are obtained within
a few seconds after addition of ROOH. Moreover, the ∼5-fold increase
in concentration of reactants in the EPR experiments compared to those
used in the UV-vis will accelerate intermolecular decay pathways. Thus,
it is reasonable to estimate ꢀ values for 2 based on 100% conversion despite
the EPR quantitation measurements.
Many mononuclear non-heme iron enzymes have been proposed
to proceed via FeIII-OOH reaction intermediates. Experimental and
theoretical work on enzymes and models have led to a widely
invoked hypothesis regarding spin state and Fe-O and O-O bond
strengths in FeIII-OOR complexes.2d,7 Low-spin intermediates have
been shown to exhibit high ν(Fe-O) and low ν(O-O), suggesting
strong Fe-O and weak O-O bonds, respectively, while high-spin
species exhibit the opposite pattern (Table 1). This trend is in
(9) Deuteration of 1 at the N-H positions does not change the ν(Fe-O),
ruling out hydrogen bonding as the cause of the low frequency.
JA064525O
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 44, 2006 14223