J. D. Bloom et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13 (2003) 2929–2932
Table 4. Heteroaryl R groups
2931
and CMV programs diverged, and all SARs reported
herein involved our efforts directed toward finding
potent CMV inhibitors. A paper describing the SARs of
the HSV series will be forthcoming.
Compd
X
Y
R
CMVa,b
33
34
35
36
37
38
3-Cl–4-CF3
3-Cl–4-CF3
3,5-(CF3)2
3,5-(CF3)2
3-Cl–4-CF3
3,5-(CF3)2
H
H
H
H
H
H
2-Pyridyl
4-(1,3-Oxazoyl)
4-(1,3-Oxazoyl)
4-(1,2,3-Thiadiazolyl)
4-(1,3-Thiazolyl)
4-(1,3-Thiazolyl)
>10
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.006
0.008
With R held constant as 2-furoyl, we explored the SAR
ofRing A ( Table 2). Alkyl and electron withdrawing
groups, especially meta and para to the thiourea nitro-
gen, showed increased potency over non-substituted
analogues (20). Disubstituted analogues (21–23 and 25)
were approximately as potent as monosubstituted (24
and 26). The most potent furan-containing inhibitor
was the 3-trifluoromethyl-4-chloro analogue 22, which
had an IC50 of0.03 mg/mL.
aIC50, mg/mL.
bVZV and HSV>10 mg/mL for all analogues in table.
Substitution on Ring B (Table 3) diminished or elimi-
nated activity altogether in every case. This was true for
analogues bearing electron withdrawing groups (30 and
31) and electron-donating groups (27 and 32). The only
analogue to retain good activity was 28 (Y=2-Me),
although it was 3-fold less potent than the correspond-
ing unsubstituted analogue 19.
Figure 4. Advanced lead candidate.
compound might be problematic. Although the com-
pounds in series were stable under conditions ofthe in
vitro assay, this unexpected instability (attributed to
hydrolysis ofthe thiourea group) prompted us to aban-
don this series and focus on modified structures with
improved stability characteristics. This will be the sub-
ject ofa future paper.
Heterocycles other than furan were synthesized and this
resulted in the most potent analogues in the series
(Table 4). We had previously demonstrated a large
advantage in activity ofa five-membered ring (ufran)
over a six-membered ring (benzene) for R (2 vs 19) and
this trend continued for other aromatic groups. The 2-
pyridyl analogue 33 had an IC50 of >10 mg/mL. How-
ever, a number offive-membered heterocycles showed
activity that was equipotent (1,3-oxazoles 34 and 35) or
superior (thiadiazole 36 and thiazole 37) to the corre-
sponding 2-furoyl analogue. Thiazoles 37 and 38 were
the most active compounds in the series with IC50s of
0.006 and 0.008 mg/mL, respectively.
HTS identified a weak inhibitor ofHSV. Chemical
synthesis improved this activity, but also revealed activity
against CMV, another herpes virus. During the course of
this program the activity versus CMV was improved
7500-fold, yielding an extremely potent (0.006 mg/mL)
inhibitor ofCMV in cultured HFF cells without loss of
selectivity. Unsuitable physical properties precluded fur-
ther development ofany compounds in this series.
Thiazole 3817 (Fig. 4) was found to be unstable under
forcing conditions, especially in acidic media at elevated
temperatures, suggesting that the in vivo stability ofthe
References and Notes
1. Britt, W. J.; Alford, C. A. In Fields Virology, 3rd ed; Fields
B. N., Knipe, D. M., Howley, P. M. Eds.; Lippincott-Raven:
Philadelphia, 1996; Vol. 2, p 2493.
Table 2. Ring A SAR
Compd
X
Y
R
CMVa
HSVa
VZVa
2. Palella, F. J.; Delaney, K. M.; Moorman, A. C.; Loveless,
M. O.; Fuhrer, J.; Satten, G. A.; Aschman, D. J.; Holmberg,
S. D. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 338, 853.
3. (a) Holland, G. N.; Buhles, W. C., Jr.; Mastre, B. Arch.
Ophthalmol. 1989, 107, 1759. (b) Spector, S. A.; Weingeist, T.;
Pollard, R. B. J. Infect. Dis. 1993, 168, 557.
4. (a) Drew, W. L. J. Infect. Dis. 1988, 158, 449. (b) Hitch-
cock, M. J. M.; Jaffe, H. S.; Martin, J. C.; Stagg, R. J. Anti-
viral Chem. Chemother. 1996, 7, 115.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
2-Furoyl
2-Furoyl
2-Furoyl
2-Furoyl
2-Furoyl
2-Furoyl
2-Furoyl
0.30
0.09
0.03
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.06
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
>10
7
3-Cl–4-Me
3-CF3–4-Cl
3-Cl–4-F
3-CF3
3,5-(CF3)2
3-CH3
>10
aIC50, mg/mL.
5. Jacobson, M. A.; Wulfsohn, M.; Feinberg, J. E. AIDS
1994, 8, 451.
6. Martin, D.; Sierra-Madero, J.; Walmsley, S.; Wolitz, R.;
Brown, F.; Robinson, C. Program and Abstracts, 7th Con-
ference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections: San
Francisco, CA, 2000; Abstr. 231.
7. Grillone, L. R.; Lanz, R. Drugs Today 2001, 37, 245.
8. Ogilvie, W. W. Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-Infect. Agents 2002,
1, 177.
9. Larsen, C.; Steliou, K.; Harpp, D. N. J. Org. Chem. 1978,
43, 337.
10. Urata, H.; Fuchikami, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 91.
Table 3. Ring B SAR
Compd
X
Y
R
CMVa HSVa VZVa
27
28
29
30
31
32
2,4-(OMe)2–5-Cl
2,4-(OMe)2–5-Cl
2,4-(OMe)2–5-Cl
2,4-(OMe)2–5-Cl
2,4-(OMe)2–5-Cl
3-OMe
2-Furb >10
2-Fur 0.6
2-Fur >10 >10 >10
2-Fur >10 >10 >10
8 >10
>10 >10
2-Me
3-Me
2-CN
2-CF3
2-Fur
2.0
2.5
>10
4
2,4-(OMe)2–5-Cl 3,6-(OMe)2 2-Fur >10 >10
aIC50, mg/mL.
b2-Fur, 2-Furoyl