Gautron et al.
Three different regimes were envisaged, all of them
pointing to the very important role played by iodide con-
centration in determining whether an anionic or a neutral
catalytic cycle is actually operating.7 In addition, the im-
portance of I- concentration, first recognized to exert a
powerful catalytic effect on the rate of the oxidative addition
of alkyl halides to Rh(I) complexes,8 was also observed in
H+ containing mixtures in which HI is generated. In fact,
HI is able to compete with MeI, giving in its turn oxidative
addition onto [IrI2(CO)2]- to form the hydride [IrHI3(CO)2]-.5
More recently, Ghaffar et al.9 and Churlaud et al.10 detected
the latter hydridic species in their reaction mixtures under
catalytic conditions, thus confirming the early proposal by
Forster.5 In their study, Churlaud et al.10 reported that when
the temperature is raised, [IrHI3(CO)2]- slowly gives
[IrI4(CO)2]- and restores [IrI2(CO)2]- after H2 evolution as
previously pointed out.5 Both cis-[IrI2(CO)2]- and the
aforementioned hydrido iodo carbonyl species, together with
[IrI3(CO)3],11 are involved in the water-gas shift reaction,
which represents a significant side reaction in the methanol
carbonylation process.11,12a,b
As far as halo carbonyl complexes of iridium are con-
cerned, oxidative addition reactions onto [IrX2(CO)2]- anions
were studied with regard to either mechanism and stereo-
chemical course.12,13 Interestingly, hydrogen halides were
found to add to the square-planar Ir(I) complexes in a
stereospecific cis-fashion: the geometry of the oxidative
addition-derived iridium complexes is fac,cis while the same
reactions onto [RhI2(CO)2]- afford mer,trans analogues.
The major formal difference between the oxidative addi-
tion of HI and that of MeI consists of a mechanistic one.
Indeed, the first step of the former process is the protonation
of the electron-rich iridium center via an electrophilic
addition, which explains the faster reaction rate observed for
HI; by contrast, kinetic evidence and theoretical calculations4a,b
indicate a classical SN2 reaction pathway for MeI, by which
the nucleophile cis-[IrI2(CO)2]- slowly attacks the carbon
atom, giving rise to a linear transition state with iodide as a
leaving group. Moreover, a density functional study of the
oxidative addition of MeI onto the Ir(I) precursor14a,b showed
that the only cis form of [IrI2(CO)2]- undergoes this type of
reaction.4c On energy grounds the trans isomer would react
faster than the cis one (the difference in energy being 3.7
kcal in favor of the trans form), but that is not the case since
the cis to trans conversion is unlikely to occur (difference
in energy of 10.39 kcal, the cis isomer being the more stable).
Therefore, we were interested in studying the competition
between HI and MeI for cis-[IrI2(CO)2]- and to determine
the structures of the so-generated anionic complexes.
Furthermore, anionic dimeric halogeno carbonyls of iri-
dium have been known for many years,15 and neutral dimeric
complexes such as [Ir(µ-Cl)Cl(CH3)(CO)2]216 and [Ir(µ-Cl)-
17
(Cl)H(CO)2]2 were also prepared. As the neutral dimeric
complex [Ir(µ-I)I(CH3)(CO)2]2 has been reported18 to react
with CO to give the tricarbonyl species [IrI2(CH3)(CO)3],
an intermediate in the iridium-catalyzed methanol carbony-
lation, our goal was also to synthesize the related iridium
dinuclear complexes that could be generated from the
Ir(III) anionic species detected and/or isolated in the course
of this work, via reaction with iodide-abstraction agents.
Experimental Section
General Procedures. All manipulations were carried out with
standard vacuum and dry-argon techniques. Dimethylformamide
(DMF, Scharlau, 99.8%), iodomethane (CH3I, Acros, 99%), hy-
driodic acid (HI, Merck, 57%), indium triodide (InI3, Acros, 99.9%),
n-hexane (Scharlau, 96%), IrI3 (iridium iodide (Johnson-Mathey)
is sold as IrI3.4, which is a mixture of IrI3 and IrI4), and carbon
C-13-enriched carbon monoxide (Air Liquide, 99%) were used as
received, and dichloromethane (CH2Cl2, Aldrich) was dried with
1
CaH2. H and 13C spectra were recorded with Bruker AC250 or
AMX 400 spectrometers. Mass spectra were recorded on a
NERMAG R10-10 (FAB negative mode; gas: Xe). The reference
for the NMR chemical shifts was SiMe4. Solution infrared spectra
were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 1710 spectrophotometer with a
0.1 mm cell equipped with CaF2 windows and when necessary with
a high-pressure infrared cell (Autoclave Top Industrie).
X-ray Crystallographic Study. Data for compounds 1, 3, and
4 were collected on an Oxford-Diffraction Xcalibur diffractometer
whereas a Nonius Kappa CCD was used for compound 2. The final
unit cell parameters were obtained by the least-squares refinement
of a large number of selected reflections. For all compounds, only
statistical fluctuations were observed in the intensity monitors over
the course of the data collections.
The structure was solved by direct methods (SIR97)19 and refined
by least-squares procedures on F2. In all compounds, all H atoms
were introduced at calculated positions as riding atoms [d(CH) )
0.99-0.98 Å], using AFIX43 for C6H5 and AFIX137 for CH3
groups, with a displacement parameter equal to 1.2 (C6H5) or 1.5
(CH3) times that of the parent atom. In compound 3, one of the
CO’s and the methyl were disordered on two sites with an
occupation factor ratio of 0.67/0.33. Least-squares refinements
2
2 2
were carried out by minimizing the function Σw(Fo - Fc ) ,
where Fo and Fc are the observed and calculated structure factors.
The weighting scheme used in the last refinement cycles was w )
2
2
1/[σ2(Fo ) + (aP)2 + bP], where P ) (Fo + 2Fc2)/3. Models
(7) Forster, D.; Singleton, T. C. J. Mol. Catal. 1982, 17, 299.
(8) Forster, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 951.
(9) Ghaffar, T.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Sunley, G. J.; Morris, G. E.; Haynes,
A.; Maitlis, P. M. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2000, 3, 11.
(10) Churlaud, R.; Frey, U.; Metz, F.; Merbach, A. E. Inorg. Chem. 2000,
39, 4137.
(11) Jones, J. H. Platinum Met. ReV. 2000, 44, 94.
(12) (a) Forster, D. Inorg. Chem. 1972, 11, 473. (b) Haak, S.; Haynes, A.;
Maitlis, P. M.; Morris, G. E.; Watt, R. J. 12th International Symposium
on Homogeneous Catalysis, Stockholm, Sweden, Aug 23-29, 2000.
(13) Haynes, A.; McNish, J.; Pearson, J. M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 551,
339.
(14) (a) Kinnunen, T.; Laasonen, K. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2001,
542, 273. (b) Kinnunen, T.; Laasonen, K. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM)
2001, 540, 91.
reached convergence with R ) Σ(||Fo| - |Fc||)/Σ(|Fo|) and wR2
2
2 2
) {Σw(Fo - Fc2)2/Σw(Fo ) }1/2, having values listed in Table 1.
(15) Cleare, M. J.; Griffith, W. P. J. Chem. Soc. A 1970, 2788.
(16) Bailey, N. A.; Jones, C. J.; Shaw, B. L.; Singleton, E. Chem. Commun.
1967, 1051.
(17) Shaw, B. L.; Singleton, E. J. Chem. Soc. A 1967, 1683
(18) Ghaffar, T.; Adams, H.; Maitlis, P. M.; Sunley, G. J.; Baker, M. J.;
Haynes, A. Chem. Commun. 1998, 1023.
(19) Altomare, A.; Burla, M. C.; Camalli, M.; Cascarano, G. L.; Giaco-
vazzo, C.; Guagliardi, A.; Moliterni, A. G. G.; Polidori, G.; Spagna,
R. SIR97 a program for automatic solution of crystal structures by
direct methods. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1999, 32, 115.
5524 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 42, No. 18, 2003