C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Figure 2. Schematic representation of (A) tetragonal columnar phase and
(B) lamellar phase obtained for PG2-C12 and PG1-C12 dendronized
polymer-surfactant complexes, respectively (see Supporting Information).
The present results demonstrate that self-assembly of dendronized
polymers decorated by alkyl chains ionically attached onto the
dendrons’ “surfaces” is a viable route to design liquid-crystalline
mesophases where both structure and period can be rationally tuned
by either the dendron generation (and thus the cross-section of the
polymers) or by the length of the alkyl chains. Owing to the
reversible nature of the ionic complexation, this process proves high
relevance for nanoporous channels, biomimetic, transport, and
nanotemplating applications.
Figure 1. SAXS diffractograms for PG1 (three lowest curves) and PG2
(upper and inset curves) dendronized polymers complexed with C8, C12,
and C18. Multiple reflections are indexed by arrows. The PG2-C12
spectrum (zoomed in the inset in the 2.5-5 nm-1 region) is given in I × q2.
Note Added after ASAP Publication. After this paper was
published ASAP on October 6, 2006, production errors in Scheme
1 were corrected on the same day.
in Figure 1 refer to complexes with the same PG1 polymer but
different alkyl tails, the difference in period of the lamellar phase
can only arise from the difference in lengths of sulfonated C12
and C18 lipids. By considering fully stretched lipid chains, the
difference in length between C18 and C12 chains is 0.65 nm.
Because a bilayer model for lipids would then lead to an increase
of 1.3 nm when going from C12 to C18, calculations are consistent
with an intercalated alkyl tails model or a bilayer of tilted alkyl
tails. Moreover, a fully stretched intercalated lipid chain model
combined with SAXS period also yields the thickness of the
dendron phase, calculated at 1.63 nm for PG1, indicating high space
filling efficiency of dendronized polymers.13
Figure 1 also highlights the effect of generation of dendronized
polymer when the surfactant is kept at fixed length, if one considers
the PG1-C12 and PG2-C12 SAXS spectra. As discussed previ-
ously, when C12 is complexed to a PG1-dendronized polymer, the
liquid-crystalline phase is lamellar with 3.3 nm period. When a
PG2 polymer is complexed with the same C12 alkyl chain,
however, the diffractogram changes into four q1:q2:q3:q4 reflections
spaced as 1:x2:2:3 (top curve and inset), which is the signature of
a rarely observed and well-organized columnar tetragonal phase,
with period 3.93 nm. The larger period of the tetragonal phase,
whose existence has been reported in the literature for phthalo-
cyanine derivatives14-16 and dendrimer-lipid complexes,9 is con-
sistent with the increase of generation of the dendronized polymer.
The change in structure is, however, more interesting. Presumably,
in PG1 polymers, the dendrons are still small enough to accept
alkyl chains in a lamellar arrangement, similarly as linear polymer-
lipid complexes.1 With increasing generation, however, steric
hindrance between dendrons starts to play an important role, further
enhanced by the volume occupancy of alkyl chains. Thus, to
optimize space-filling requirements and reduce lipid crowding, the
dendron-lipid bulky moieties will have to twist each other with
respect to the polymer backbone, leading to a columnar rather than
a lamellar phase, thus undergoing a transition similar to that reported
in dendrimer-based LC.17
Supporting Information Available: Synthesis and molecular
packing data. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) (a) Antonietti, M.; Conrad, J.; Thuenemann, A. Macromolecules 1994,
27, 6007. (b) Kato, T. Science 2002, 295, 2414.
(2) (a) Binnemans, K. Chem. ReV. 2005, 105, 4148. (b) Paleos, C. M. Mol.
Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1994, 243, 159. (c) Tschierske, C. Prog. Polym. Sci.
1996, 21, 775.
(3) (a) Kim, Y. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 4947. (b) Bauer, S.; Fischer,
H.; Ringsdorf, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 1589. (c) Park,
C.; Choi, K. S.; Jeon, H. J.; Song, H. H.; Chang, J. Y.; Kim, C. Langmuir
2006, 22, 3812.
(4) (a) Percec, V.; Cho, W. D.; Moeller, M.; Prokhorova, S. A.; Ungar, G.;
Yeardley, D. J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4249. (b) Zeng, X.; Ungar,
G.; Liu, Y.; Percec, V.; Dulcey, A. E.; Hobbs, J. K. Nature 2004, 428,
157.
(5) (a) Lorentz, K.; Holter, D.; Stuhn, B.; Mu¨lhaupt, R.; Frey, H. AdV. Mater.
1996, 8, 414. (b) Pesak, D. J.; Moore, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 1636.
(6) (a) Antonietti, M.; Kaul, A.; Thuenemann, A. Langmuir 1995, 11, 2633.
(b) Ponomarenko, E. A.; Tirrell, D. A.; MacKnight, W. J. Macromolecules
1996, 29, 8751. (c) General, S.; Antonietti, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2002, 41, 2957. (d) McManus, J. J.; Radler, J. O.; Dawson, K. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15966. (e) Franke, D.; Vos, M.; Antonietti, M.;
Sommerdijk, Faul, C. F. J. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1839.
(7) Marcos, M.; Martin-Rapun, R.; Omenat, A.; Barbera, J.; Romero, P.;
Serrano, J. L. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 1206.
(8) Chen, Y.; Shen, Z.; Gehringer, L.; Frey, H.; Stiriba, S. E. Macromol.
Rapid Commun. 2006, 27, 69.
(9) Martin-Rapun, R.; Marcos, M.; Omenat, A.; Barbera, J.; Romero, P.;
Serrano, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7397.
(10) (a) Schlu¨ter, A. D.; Rabe, J. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 864. (b)
Schlu¨ter, A. D. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 245, 151.
(11) Kase¨mi, E.; Zhuang, W.; Rabe, J. P.; Fischer, K.; Schmidt, M.; Colussi,
M.; Keul, H.; Yi, D.; Co¨lfen, H.; Schlu¨ter, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006,
128, 5091.
(12) Zhang, A.; Zhang, B.; Wa¨chtersbach, E.; Schmidt, M.; Schlu¨ter, A. D.
Chem.sEur. J. 2003, 9, 6083.
(13) Zhang, A.; Okrasa, L.; Pakula, T.; Schlu¨ter, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2004, 126, 6658.
(14) Belarbi, Z.; Sirlin, C.; Simon, J.; Andre, J. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93,
8105.
(15) Lelievre, D.; Petit, M. A.; Simon, J. Liq. Cryst. 1989, 4, 707.
(16) Komatsu, T.; Ohta, K.; Watanabe, T.; Ikemoto, H.; Fujimoto, T.;
Yamamoto, I. J. Mater. Chem. 1994, 4, 537.
(17) Ponomarenko, S. A.; Boiko, N. I.; Shibaev, V. P.; Richardson, R. M.
Whitehouse, I. J.; Rebrov, E. A.; Muzafarov, A. Z. Macromolecules 2000,
33, 5549.
On the basis of SAXS data and molecular calculations on the
size of alkyl tails, we propose the molecular organization model
sketched in Figure 2 for the LC polymers based on PG1 and PG2
complexed with sulfonated C8, C12, C18 lipids.
JA065113I
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 43, 2006 13999