5976
Organometallics 2006, 25, 5976-5978
N-H versus C-H Activation of a Pyrrole Imine at {Cp*Ir}: A
Computational and Experimental Study
David L. Davies,*,† Steven M. A. Donald,‡ Omar Al-Duaij,† John Fawcett,†
Craig Little,‡ and Stuart A. Macgregor*,‡
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K., and School of Engineering
and Physical Sciences, William Perkin Building, Heriot-Watt UniVersity, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, U.K.
ReceiVed September 21, 2006
Scheme 1
Summary: Reaction of a pyrrole imine with [IrCl2Cp*]2/NaOAc
leads to N-H actiVation in preference to C-H actiVation at
the pyrrole; howeVer, with the N-methylated ligand C-H
actiVation occurs. Density functional calculations show that
N-H bond actiVation is both kinetically and thermodynamically
preferred to C-H actiVation. Both reactions occur with
relatiVely low energy barriers by an electrophilic agostic
interaction with the metal with simultaneous intramolecular
hydrogen bonding with acetate leading to deprotonation Via a
six-membered transition state.
In 2003 we reported the facile cyclometalation of nitrogen
donor ligands with [MCl2Cp*]2 (M ) Rh, Ir) or [RuCl2(p-
cymene)]2 in the presence of sodium acetate.1 Subsequent
density functional calculations on the cyclometalation of di-
methylbenzylamine with [Pd(OAc)2]2 and [IrCl2Cp*]23 showed
both these reactions to proceed via six-membered transition
states with significant intramolecular H bonding to coordinated
acetate and some degree of agostic C-H interaction with the
metal. Thus, the metal acetate provides electrophilic activation
of the C-H bond and acts as an intramolecular base for the
deprotonation. Other computational and experimental studies
have suggested an important role for H bonding to acetate in
orienting a substrate.4 The use of carboxylate to facilitate C-H
activation has also been demonstrated recently in the activation
of benzene by platinum(II) complexes.5 We report here the
extension of our work to the activation of N-H bonds which
provides further insight into the nature of these acetate-assisted
bond activation processes.
such processes have been studied computationally,8 though more
recently a σ-bond metathesis pathway has also been proposed.9
Proton transfer to a bound ligand is well-known with lanthanide
metals, being a key step in hydroamination catalysis; however,
these involve highly basic metal alkyls or amides.10 Previous
studies of activation of pyrrole have generally shown that N-H
activation is favored over C-H activation, at least for low-
oxidation-state complexes.11 In contrast, Sames has recently
reported the rhodium(III)-catalyzed arylation of pyrrole and
indoles in which C-H activation is preferred over N-H
activation.12 In this case a coordinated pivalate is thought to
play a key role in this process. Thus, we decided to study the
cyclometalation of pyrrole imines L1 and L2, derived from
pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, with [IrCl2Cp*]2/NaOAc (Scheme 1).
L1 has both a C-H and an N-H bond available for activation
and so is an ideal system in which to assess the competition
between these two processes, while L2 only has a C-H bond
available. Density functional calculations have also been used
to quantify the energetics of the competing N-H and C-H bond
activation.
N-H activation is an extremely important reaction in alkene
amination6 and hydrodenitrogenation.7 For middle to late
transition metals N-H activation usually occurs via oxidative
addition to an electron-rich low-oxidation-state complex and
Pyrrole imine L1 reacted with [IrCl2Cp*]2 and NaOAc in
1
dichloromethane at room temperature. The H NMR spectrum
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dld3@
leicester.ac.uk (D.L.D.); s.a.macgregor@hw.ac.uk (S.A.M.).
† University of Leicester.
of the product shows a 1:1 ratio of the Cp* and the pyrrole
ligand. Three multiplets, each having an integration of 1H, are
observed at δ 6.38, 6.78, and 7.17 in the region expected for
pyrrole ring protons, suggesting formation of the N,N chelating
product 1a (the alternative C,N product 1b would only show
‡ Heriot-Watt University.
(1) Davies, D. L.; Al-Duaij, O.; Fawcett, J.; Giardiello, M.; Hilton, S.
T.; Russell, D. R. Dalton Trans. 2003, 4132.
(2) Davies, D. L.; Donald, S. M. A.; Macgregor, S. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 13754.
(3) Davies, D. L.; Donald, S. M. A.; Al-Duaij, O.; Macgregor, S. A.;
Polleth, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4210.
(4) (a) Privalov, T.; Linde, C.; Zetterberg, K.; Moberg, C. Organo-
metallics 2005, 24, 885. (b) Steinhoff, B. A.; Guzei, I. A.; Stahl, S. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11268. (c) Mueller, J. A.; Goller, C. P.; Sigman,
M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9724.
(5) Ziatdinov, V. R.; Oxgaard, J.; Mironov, O. A.; Young, K. J. H.;
Goddard, W. A.; Periana, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7404.
(6) For reviews see for example: (a) Muller, T. E.; Beller, M. Chem.
ReV. 1998, 98, 675. (b) Brunet, J.-J.; Neibecker, D. In Catalytic Hetero-
functionalization; Togni, A., Gru¨tzmacher, H., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Wein-
heim, Germany, 2001; p 91.
(8) Macgregor, S. A. Organometallics 2001, 20, 1860.
(9) Pittard, K. A.; Cundari, T. R.; Gunnoe, T. B.; Day, C. S.; Petersen,
J. L. Organometallics 2005, 24, 5015.
(10) Gagne´, M. R.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 4108. Gagne´,
M. R.; Stern, C. L.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 114, 275.
(11) (a) Ladipo, F. T.; Merola, J. S. Inorg. Chem. 1990, 29, 4172. (b)
Jones, W. D.; Dong, L.; Myers, A. W. Organometallics 1995, 14, 855. (c)
Morikita, T.; Hirano, M.; Sasaki, A.; Komiya, S. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1999,
291, 341. (d) Lopez, C.; Baron, G.; Arevalo, A.; Munoz-Hernandez, M.
A.; Garcia, J. J. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 664, 170. (e) Hirano, M.; Onuki,
K.; Kimura, Y.; Komiya, S. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2003, 352, 160.
(12) Wang, X.; Lane, B. S.; Sames, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127,
4996.
(7) Bianchini, C.; Meli, A.; Vizza, F. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2001, 43.
10.1021/om060863m CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Publication on Web 11/23/2006