C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
by BTE faithfully mirrors that of the full-fledged polypeptides. In
both series the Phe-10 f F5-Phe mutant is most stably folded.12
Our systematic examination of all F5-Phe variants involving core
Phe residues in a small folded protein has revealed a specific
mutation that enhances tertiary structural stability. Six of the seven
F5-Phe-containing mutants, however, proved to be less stably folded
than the version containing the three native Phe residues. This trend
differs from that seen with fluoroalkyl side chain substitutions,
which have been stabilizing in several different systems.2 Our
observations suggest that it is difficult for the cVHP tertiary fold
to take advantage of stabilization mechanisms that become available
when F5-Phe is introduced. The destabilizing effects could reflect
steric repulsions that arise from the increase in side-chain volume
and/or from minor conformational rearrangements that might be
necessary for harnessing improved side-chain interactions. Identify-
ing the precise mechanisms of destabilization induced by each
mutation pattern may be difficult or impossible, as is also generally
the case with stabilizing mutations. Nevertheless, our results are
valuable in the context of protein engineering because they show
that introduction of fluoroaryl side chains can stabilize folded
conformations, but that stabilization is not a general effect of Phe
f F5-Phe mutation.
Figure 2. (A) Sequence comparison for cVHP, m-cVHP, and t-cVHP; (B)
correlation of ∆Gfold/Gdm determined for four polypeptides (cVHP and the
three single Phe f F5-Phe mutants at position 6, 10, or 17) and ∆Gfold/BTE
determined for an analogous set of four thioester-containing molecules (t-
cVHP and the three single Phe f F5-Phe mutants at position 6, 10, or 17).
Linear regression was used to determine the line of best fit.
Table 1. Comparison of ∆G fold/BTE for VHP-Derived Thioestersa
peptide
∆G fold
/BTE
t-cVHP
-1.9
-1.2
-2.5
-1.5
-1.7
-1.2
-1.2
-1.1
t-cVHP (Phe6 f f5-Phe)
t-cVHP (Phe10 f f5-Phe)
t-cVHP (Phe17 f f5-Phe)
t-cVHP (Phe6,10 f f5-Phe)
t-cVHP (Phe6,17 f f5-Phe)
t-cVHP (Phe10,17 f f5-Phe)
t-cVHP (Phe6,10,17 f f5-Phe
Acknowledgment. This research was supported by the NIH
Grant GM-61238 (S.H.G.). M.G.W. was supported in part by a
Fellowship from the Organic Division of the American Chemical
Society, sponsored by Eli Lilly and Company.
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details, CD
analysis, chemical denaturation data, and HPLC chromatograms. This
a Values are reported in kcal/mol. We estimate the error in the BTE
measurements to be ca. (0.1 kcal/mol.
the free energies of folding (∆Gfold/Gdm). The five Lys f Arg
mutations cause a moderate diminution of tertiary structural stability
(∆Gfold/Gdm ) -3.3 kcal/mol for cVHP vs -2.5 kcal/mol for
m-cVHP). The amide f thioester change, however, causes very
little additional change in stability (∆Gfold/Gdm ) -2.2 kcal/mol for
t-cVHP), consistent with previous BTE results.8 These findings
suggest that insights gathered via BTE analysis of t-cVHP and
related molecules are relevant to the folding of analogues containing
pure amide backbones (i.e., proteins).
HPLC was used to measure KBTE for t-cVHP (Figure 1b). By
initiating thioester-thiol exchange from each side of the equation
shown in Figure 1b, we could show that equilibrium was attained
within 2.5 h (pH 7).6 Tertiary folding occurs in t-cVHP under the
reaction conditions, as verified by CD, but not in the other
thioester-thiol pair because residues 1-10 and residues 11-35
reside in different molecules. KBTE can be used to calculate the
free energy of tertiary folding (∆Gfold/BTE) in the full-length thioester,
as previously described.8 For t-cVHP, ∆Gfold/BTE ) -1.9 kcal/mol,
References
(1) (a) Marsh, E. N. G. Chem. Biol. 2004, 14, R153. (b) Yoder, N. C.; Kumar,
K. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2002, 31, 335. (c) Jackel, C.; Koksch, B. Eur. J.
Org. Chem. 2005, 4483.
(2) (a) Holmgren, S. K.; Taylor, K. M.; Bretscher, L. E.; Raines, R. T. Nature
1998, 392, 666. (b) Tang, Y.; Ghirlanda, G.; Vaidehi, N.; Kua, J.; Mainz,
D. T.; Goddard, W. A.; DeGrado, W. F.; Tirrell, D. A. Biochemistry 2001,
40, 2790. (c) Bilgicer, B.; Fichera, A.; Kumar, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 4393. (d) Bilgicer, B.; Xing, X.; Kumar, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 11815. (e) Horng, J.-C.; Raleigh, D. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003,
125, 9286. (f) Lee, K.-H.; Lee, H.-Y.; Slutsky, M. M.; Anderson, J. T.;
Marsh, E. N. G. Biochemistry 2004, 43, 16277. (g) Lee, K.-H.; Lee, H.-
Y.; Al-Hashimi, H. M.; Marsh, E. N. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
337. (h) Ja¨ckel, C.; Salwiczek, M.; Koksch, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2006, 45, 4198.
(3) Butterfield, S. M.; Patel, P. R.; Waters, M. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 9751.
(4) A quantitative measure of the hydrophobicity for Phe and F5-Phe sidechains
was obtained by partitioning amino acid analogues in water/heptanol:
HΠPhe ) 1.71, ΠF -Phe ) 2.12. (see Supporting Information).
H
(5) (a) Dunitz, J. D. C5hemBioChem 2004, 5, 614. (b) Williams, J. R. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1993, 26, 593. (c) West, A. P.; Mecozzi, S.; Dougherty, D.
A. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1997, 10, 347.
(6) See Supporting Information.
(7) (a) McKnight, C. J.; Matsudaira, P. T.; Kim, P. S. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1997,
4, 180. (b) Vardar, D.; Buckley, D. A.; Frank, B. S.; McKnight, C. J. J.
Mol. Biol. 1999, 294, 1299. (c) Chiu, T. K.; Kubelka, J.; Herbst-Irmer,
R.; Eaton, W. A.; Hofrichter, J.; Davies, D. R. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 2005, 102, 7517.
which is similar to ∆Gfold/Gdm
.
∆Gfold/BTE was determined for all variants of t-cVHP containing
one, two, or three Phe f F5-Phe replacements at residues 6, 10,
and/or 17 (Table 1). Each variant appeared to adopt a stable tertiary
fold (∆Gfold/BTE < 0), but only the Phe-10 f F5-Phe mutant,
displayed greater conformational stability than does t-cVHP. The
range of ∆Gfold/BTE values (1.4 kcal/mol) is significant because it
is comparable to the conformational stability of t-cVHP. We
compared our VHP thioester results with data from a more
traditional approach in an effort to validate the BTE method. Figure
2b shows a comparison of ∆Gfold/BTE for t-cVHP and its three single
Phe f F5-Phe mutants with ∆Gfold/Gdm for m-cVHP and its three
single Phe f F5-Phe mutants. The linear correlation shows that
the conformational stability trend indicated for the thioester series
(8) Woll, M. G.; Gellman, S. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11172.
(9) Thioester-thiol exchange is a form of dynamic covalent chemistry: (a)
Larrson, R.; Pei, Z.; Ramstro¨m, O. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3716.
(b) Leclaire, J.; Vial, L.; Otto, S.; Sanders, J. K. M. Chem. Commun.
2005, 1959. (c) Rowan, S. J.; Cantrill, S. J.; Cousins, G. R. L.; Sanders,
J. K. M.; Stoddart, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 898.
(10) Garcia-Mira, M. M.; Sadqi, M.; Fischer, N.; Sanchez-Ruiz, J. M.; Munoz,
V. Science 2002, 298, 2191.
(11) Pace, C. N.; Shaw, K. L. Proteins: Struct. Funct., Genet. Suppl. 2000, 4,
1.
(12) The solution structure of a Phe-10 f F5-Phe mutant of c-VHP has been
determined: Cornilescu, G.; Hadley, E. B.; Woll, M. G.; Markley, J. L.;
Gellman, S. H.; Cornilescu, C. C. Protein Sci. In press.
JA0634573
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 50, 2006 15933