tempted to postulate an enamine intermediate, this is unlikely
to be the case, since the cyclization also took place when
N-methylpyrrolidine was used in place of pyrrolidine. The
Lewis acid catalyzed process appears to take place under
kinetic control. For example, diketone 7 (Table 1, entry 1)
leads to a ca. 4/1 mixture of products 8 and 9. The negligible
difference in stability between these two isomers suggests
that keto-enol equilibration is slow under the reaction
conditions. In the case of diketone 4 (Scheme 2), Yb(OTf)3
was the most effective of the Lewis acids that we screened
in promoting the desired cyclization. Inferior yields of 2 were
obtained from reactions catalyzed by Cu(OTf)2, Sc(OTf)3,
La(OTf)3, or InCl3 (31%, 32%, 36%, or 26% yield, respec-
tively). The same Lewis acids were screened for the
cyclizations of diketone 10 (Table 1, entry 2). The yield of
cyclopentenone 11 from the Cu(OTf)2-, Sc(OTf)3-, La-
(OTf)3-, and InCl3-catalyzed reactions was 96%, 48%, 90%,
and 91%, respectively. It appears that R branching in the
diketone facilitates the Lewis acid-catalyzed cyclizations.
The mechanism of the LiTMP-mediated process will be
considered first, using 4 as the example. It is reasonable to
assume that enolization of 4 precedes cyclization. The
intramolecular Michael addition of the enolate to the enone
is precluded by poor orbital overlap (this would represent a
5-endo-trig ring closure, which is disallowed by Baldwin’s
Rules).12 However, an electrocyclic process involving the
internally chelated lithium enolate 31 (M ) Li) cannot be
ruled out. The Lewis acid-catalyzed cyclizations of the
diketones may proceed through a related mechanism, whereby
bidentate complexation of the metal salt by the two carbonyl
oxygen atoms is followed by proton abstraction by the amine
base to give enolate 31 (M ) Yb(OTf)2), which subsequently
undergoes conrotatory ring closure. If this mechanistic
hypothesis is valid, these cyclizations represent the first
examples of Nazarov reactions of metalloenolates. Some
years ago, in the context of allene ether Nazarov reactions
we made the observation that polarization of one of the
alkenes flanking the ketone carbonyl group by means of an
electron-donating oxygen atom accelerates the cyclization.13
These enolate cyclizations may represent extreme examples
of the same phenomenon.14
If the cyclizations of R-diketones do indeed take place
through the intermediacy of enolates, it is reasonable to
postulate that R substitution by an electron-withdrawing
group is likely to facilitate the process. The result shown in
Scheme 3 lends some credence to this hypothesis. Mor-
Scheme 3
pholino enamide 3215 was treated with the R lithio anion
derived from tetrahydropyranyl vinyl ether16 to give dienone
33 in 94% yield. Exposure of an ethereal solution of 33
containing 1 mL of water to a small excess of NBS at room
temperature led to bromide 34 in 82% yield following
column chromatography as a labile pale yellow oil. This
material underwent slow decomposition upon storage at 4
°C neat; however, in chloroform solution at room temperature
over 2 days it underwent partial cyclization to bromocyclo-
pentenone 35 spontaneously. Exposure of 34 to LiTMP in
THF at -78 °C, followed by warming, led to 35 in 74%
yield as a single (trans) isomer. These results suggest that
the chemistry is likely to offer considerable opportunities
for the synthesis of multifunctional cyclopentenones.
In summary, mechanistically interesting cyclization reac-
tions that may be categorized as Nazarov reactions have been
described. If indeed these reactions represent conrotations,
they are apparently the first such reactions to be described
for enolates.17 The cyclizations that lead to heterocycles 5
and 6 are likely to be part of a much larger family of
heterocycle-forming electrocyclizations.
(5) General Procedure of the Yb(OTf)3-Mediated Cyclization. The
R-diketone and Yb(OTf)3 were dissolved in DMSO (0.04-0.1 M) at room
temperature under nitrogen. To this solution was added pyrrolidine (1 equiv),
and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir at room temperature until the
reaction was judged to be complete by TLC (ca. 6-24 h). The solution
was diluted with water and the aqueous phase was extracted with Et2O.
The organic phase was dried (MgSO4), concentrated, and purified by flash
column chromatography over silica gel (5% EtOAc/hexanes) to afford the
R-hydroxycyclopentenone.
(13) Tius, M. A.; Kwok, C.-K.; Gu, X-q.; Zhao, C. Synth. Commun.
1994, 24, 871-885.
(6) Tius, M. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 284-290.
(7) Yadav, J. S.; Reddy, B. V. S.; Reddy, M. S.; Prasad, A. R.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 9703-9706.
(14) Polarization of the alkene by electron withdrawal also accelerates
the Nazarov cyclization: He, W.; Sun, X.; Frontier, A. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 14278-14279.
(8) (a) Hertenstein, U.; Hu¨nig, S.; O¨ ller, M. Synthesis 1976, 416-417.
(b) Fischer, K.; Hu¨nig, S. Chem. Ber. 1986, 119, 3344-3362.
(9) Moore, J. D.; Finney, N. S. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3001-3003.
(10) For an alternative approach to similar compounds, see: Williams,
D. R.; Robinson, L. A.; Amato, G. S.; Osterhout, M. H. J. Org. Chem.
1992, 57, 3740-3744.
(15) Harrington, P. E.; Murai, T.; Chu, C., Tius, M. A. J. Am. Chem
Soc. 2002, 124, 10091-10100.
(16) Tamao, K.; Nakagawa, Y.; Arai, H.; Higuchi, N.; Ito, Y. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3712-3714; see footnote 9.
(17) Professor David R. Williams (Indiana University) has alerted us to
unpublished work from his research program that demonstrates the Nazarov
reaction of an R-diketone upon exposure to BF3‚Et2O in refluxing 1,2-
dichloroethane. The vigorous conditions for cyclization are consistent with
a process that proceeds through Lewis acid activation of the enol form of
the diketone rather than a process involving an enolate, as we have postulated
in this paper. Professor Williams’ unpublished work is discussed in the
following review article: Rodr´ıguez, A.; Gonza´lez, E.; Ram´ırez, C.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 11683-11729. See compound 164.
(11) The reaction worked best in DMSO that had not been scrupulously
dried.
(12) (a) Baldwin, J. E. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 734-736.
(b) Baldwin, J. E.; Cutting, J.; Dupont, W.; Kruse, L.; Silberman, L.;
Thomas, R. C. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1976, 736-738. (c) Baldwin,
J. E.; Kruse, L. I. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1977, 233-235. (d)
Baldwin, J. E.; Thomas, R. C.; Kruse, L. I.; Silberman, L. J. Org. Chem.
1977, 42, 3846-3852.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 13, 2005
2773