the tagged, innermost monosaccharide.20 Notably, because of the
fixation of the charge on the quarternary nitrogen, these deriva-
tives are not supposed to have mobile protons20 and the mecha-
nism of these rearrangements is not clear.
MALDI-TOF(/TOF)-MS(/MS). Samples were spotted with
DHB (10 mg/mL in 30% acetonitrile) matrix and analyzed
in the positive and/or negative (reflectron) mode by MALDI-
TOF(/TOF)-MS(/MS) on a Ultraflex II mass spectrometer
(Bruker Daltonics) containing a Smartbeam Nd:YAG laser (266
nm). Fragment analysis was achieved by laser-induced decom-
position using the LIFT-TOF/TOF-MS/MS facility. Between 2 000
and 10 000 tandem mass spectra were acquired from different sites
on the sample spot and were accumulated to obtain a representa-
tive fragment spectrum. Fragment ions were assigned using
GlycoWorkbench.24
LC-MS(/MS). Reverse phase-nanoLC-ion trap (IT)-MS/MS
of 2AB-labeled glycans was performed on a PepMap column using
an Ultimate 3000 nanoLC system (Dionex) equipped with a guard
column. The system was equilibrated with eluent A (0.4% aceto-
nitrile, 0.1% formic acid in water) at a flow rate of 300 nL/min.
After injection of the sample, a linear gradient to 25% eluent B
(H2O/acetonitrile 5:95, v/v, containing 0.1% formic acid) in 15
min was applied, followed by a gradient to 70% eluent B in
another 10 min and a final wash with 70% B for 5 min. The
nanoLC system was directly coupled to an Esquire High
Capacity Trap (HCTultra) ESI-IT-MS (Bruker) equipped with
an online nanospray source operating in the positive-ion mode
at 900-1200 V. The solvent was evaporated at 170 °C with a
nitrogen stream of 6 L/min. Ions from m/z 400-2000 were
registered. Automatic fragment ion analysis was enabled,
resulting in MS/MS spectra of the most abundant peaks.
Fragment ions were assigned using GlycoWorkbench.24
Ions generated by internal residue loss, if mistakenly inter-
preted as conventional glycosidic bond cleavages, may lead to the
false postulation of structural motifs and suggest the presence of
a mixture of isomers. Because of the lack of basic rules for the
occurrence of rearrangement products associated with internal
residue loss, tandem mass spectrometry of proton adducts is of
rather limited value for the de novo structural elucidation of
glycoconjugates. Notably, fucosylated glycans and glycoconjugates
have repeatedly been shown to undergo rearrangements reactions
very efficiently,11,14 but rearrangements involving other monosac-
charide moieties have likewise been shown.12,14,15,21
Here, we describe for the first time hexose rearrangements
in tandem mass spectrometry of proton adducts of N-glycopeptides
and reductively aminated N-glycans. A profound knowledge of the
occurrence of such rearrangement reactions would appear to be
essential to establish reliable de novo sequencing algorithms for
structural glycomics at the glycopeptide level.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Materials and Reagents. Peptide N-glycosidase F (PNGase
F) was purchased from Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany.
Bovine ribonuclease B (RNase B), 2-aminobenzamide (2AB),
2-aminobenzoic acid (anthranilic acid, AA), sodium cyanoboro-
hydride, formic acid, and ammonia (25% aqueous solution) were
from Sigma-Aldrich (Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands). The HILIC
HPLC column (Amide-80, 4.6 mm × 25 cm, particle size 5 µm)
was from Tosoh Bioscience, Stuttgart, Germany. 2,5-Dihydroxy-
benzoic acid (DHB) was obtained from Bruker Daltonics (Bremen,
Germany). The PepMap column (3 µm; 75 µm × 150 mm) and
guard column (300 µm × 5 mm) were from Dionex, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands. Platin coated fused-silica electrospray needles
360 µm o.d., 20 µm i.d. with 10 µm opening) were from New
Objective (Cambridge, MA).
Glycan Release and Labeling. N-Glycans were released from
RNase B (50 mg) by PNGase F as described previously.22 Briefly,
protein was dissolved in PBS containing SDS (1%) and 2-mercap-
toethanol (0.5%) and incubated for 10 min at 100 °C. Chaps was
added to a final concentration of 1%, followed by overnight PNGase
F treatment at 37 °C. Released glycans were sequentially purified
by using RP- and graphitized carbon cartridges.22 Glycans were
labeled with the fluorescent compounds 2AB and AA by reductive
amination with sodium cyanoborohydride.23 The labeled glycans
were purified by HILIC HPLC with fluorescence detection
(λex-λem 360-425 nm). Eluent A consisted of 50 mmol/L
ammonium formiate (pH 4.4), and eluent B consisted of eluent
A/acetonitrile 20:80. A linear gradient from 100% to 40% eluent
B was applied at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. Peak-fractions were
analyzed by MALDI-TOF-MS, and fractions containing isomers
were pooled.
RESULTS
N-Glycans of bovine ribonuclease B (RNase B) were
released using PNGase F, labeled with 2-aminobenzoic acid
(AA) and 2-aminobenzamide (2AB), purified by HILIC with
fluorescence detection, and analyzed by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS/
MS. Fragmentation of the deprotonated, AA-labeled hexaman-
nosidic (Man6GlcNAc2-AA) N-glycan in negative-ion mode is
shown in Figure 1A. The tandem mass spectrum is character-
ized by cleavages of glycosidic bonds as well as some cross-
ring cleavages, which are in full compliance with the structure
of the RNase B Man6 N-glycan as described in the literature.25,26
Analysis of the HPLC-purified Man6GlcNAc2-AA by MALDI-
TOF-MS in positive-ion mode resulted in the registration of
sodium adducts ([M + Na]+ at m/z 1378), proton adducts
([M + H]+ at m/z 1356), and potassium adducts ([M + K]+,
at m/z 1394) at relative intensities of approximately 60:20:
20, respectively. Proton adducts of the RNase B Man6 in
AA-labeled form (Figure 1B) and 2AB-labeled form (Figure
1C) were analyzed by MALDI-TOF/TOF-MS/MS. The frag-
mentation of the [M + H]+ species did predominantly result
in cleavages of glycosidic bonds, and no cross-ring cleavages
were observed. The most intense fragment ions at m/z 1176
arose from chitobiose cleavage (Figure 1B,C). Moreover, a
combination of chitobiose cleavage with loss of mannoses
accounted for a series of ions at m/z 1014, m/z 852, m/z 690,
(20) Broberg, A. Carbohydr. Res. 2007, 342, 1462–1469
(21) Hsu, F. F.; Turk, J. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 15, 536–546
(22) Wuhrer, M.; Koeleman, C. A. M.; Deelder, A. M.; Hokke, C. H. FEBS J.
2006, 273, 347–361
(23) Bigge, J. C.; Patel, T. P.; Bruce, J. A.; Goulding, P. N.; Charles, S. M.; Parekh,
R. B. Anal. Biochem. 1995, 230, 229–238
.
.
(24) Ceroni, A.; Maass, K.; Geyer, H.; Geyer, R.; Dell, A.; Haslam, S. M. J.
Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 1650–1659
(25) Fu, D.; Chen, L.; O’Neill, R. A. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 261, 173–186
(26) Zhuang, Z.; Starkey, J. A.; Mechref, Y.; Novotny, M. V.; Jacobson, S. C.
Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 7170–7175
.
.
.
.
.
Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 81, No. 11, June 1, 2009 4423