Hemithioacetal Reactivity of Ni(II) Complex
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 2
Scheme 3
the results of this study provide the first insight into hemith-
ioacetal isomerization promoted by a well-characterized syn-
thetic Ni(II) complex versus simple Ni(II) ion.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization of [(bppppa-)Ni]ClO4 (1).
Chelate ligands containing secondary amide appendages have
been shown to stabilize a variety of mononuclear metal
hydroxide complexes.12-16 With this in mind, we attempted to
prepare a new mononuclear Ni(II)-OH complex starting from
the X-ray crystallographically characterized mononuclear Ni-
(II) complex [(bppppa)Ni](ClO4)2 (2, Scheme 3).17 Treatment
of this complex with 1 equiv of Me4NOH‚5H2O in CH3CN
resulted in the formation of an orange/brown solution. Following
workup and recrystallization from CH3CN/CH3OH/Et2O,
[(bppppa-)Ni]ClO4‚CH3OH (1) was isolated in 68% yield as
orange-brown crystals. Complex 1 has been characterized by
X-ray crystallography, 1H NMR, UV-vis, FTIR, and elemental
analysis. These combined characterization methods indicate that,
instead of formation of the desired mononuclear Ni(II)-OH
complex, treatment of 2 with 1 equiv of base resulted in the
formation of a deprotonated amide complex.
absorption studies of the enzyme-product complex of E. coli
GlxI show no evidence of Ni(II)-product interactions, leading
previous researchers to favor the proton-transfer mechanism
shown in Scheme 2.
To date, only three structurally characterized mononuclear
Ni(II)-OH complexes have been reported in the literature.10
Neither these complexes nor any other mononuclear Ni(II)
complex has been shown to promote the isomerization of a
hemithioacetal in a fashion akin to that proposed for E. coli
GlxI. In 1970, a single brief report appeared in the literature in
which the use of NiBr2‚2H2O and the base 1-methylpyrrolidine
was indicated to promote the isomerization of a hemithioacetal
to produce a thioester product in DMF.11 No experimental details
or yield of the thioester product were reported for this reaction.
In the work described herein, we have explored the hemi-
thioacetal isomerization reactivity of mononuclear Ni(II) com-
plex supported by a chelate ligand containing an oxygen-
coordinated deprotonated amide ligand. This complex, which
was produced during attempts to generate a mononuclear Ni-
(II)-OH complex, promotes the isomerization of a hemithio-
acetal to produce a thioester product. Importantly, this is the
first synthetic Ni(II) complex to be reported that exhibits
glyoxalase I-type reactivity. Control studies indicate that the
presence of the deprotonated amide in the supporting chelate
ligand is required for hemithioacetal isomerization reactivity.
Additionally, we have reexamined the previously reported
hemithioacetal isomerization reaction promoted by NiBr2‚2H2O/
1-methylpyrrolidine in DMF.11 Using a deuterium-labeled
hemithioacetal and 2H NMR spectroscopy, we have found that,
while thioester formation does occur, this reaction is significantly
slower than the reaction involving the deprotonated amide
complex. These hemithioacetal isomerization reactions also
An ORTEP drawing of the cationic portion of 1 is shown in
Figure 1. Details of the X-ray data collection and refinement
are given in Table 1. Selected bond distances in 1 and its parent
17
complex [(bppppa)Ni](ClO4)2 (2) are provided in Figure 1.
Additional bond distances and angles for 1 are given in Table
2. As expected, the presence of the deprotonated amide in 1
results in a slight contraction of the C(5)-N(1) bond and
elongation of the amide C(5)-O(1) bond (Figure 1 (bottom))
relative to the distances found in the structurally similar 2
wherein a protonated amide is present. The shorter C(6)-N(1)
distance in 1 (1.373(4) Å) may be attributed to delocalization
1
of the anionic charge into the pyridyl ring. H NMR spectro-
scopic evidence for such delocalization has been previously
reported for a zinc analogue complex.18 This delocalization,
along with the presence of the Ni(II) ion, stabilizes the
deprotonated amide moiety in 1. Notably, the average Ni(1)-
NPhPy distance increases slightly in 1 (2.11 Å) relative to that
found in 2 (2.09 Å). This is an indication of a less Lewis acidic
Ni(II) center in 1. The Ni(II) center in both complexes exhibits
2
differ in the nature of species that are detectable by H NMR
spectroscopy. For the reaction involving the deprotonated amide
coordination complex, no evidence was found for Ni(II)-
coordinated species, whereas in the NiBr2‚2H2O-promoted
reaction several spectroscopically identifiable new species are
present in the reaction mixture, some of which may involve
coordination between the hemithioacetal and Ni(II). Overall,
(12) Berreau, L. M.; Mahapatra, S.; Halfen, J. A.; Young, V. G., Jr.; Tolman,
W. B. Inorg. Chem. 1996, 35, 6339-6342.
(13) Cheruzel, L. E.; Cecil, M. R.; Edison, S. E.; Mashuta, M. S.; Baldwin, M.
J.; Buchanan, R. M. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 3191-3202.
(14) Borovik, A. S. Acc. Chem. Res. 2005, 38, 54-61.
(15) MacBeth, C. E.; Hammes, B. S.; Young, V. G., Jr.; Borovik, A. S. Inorg.
Chem. 2001, 40, 4733-4741.
(9) Proton-transfer reactions involving the oxygen atoms of the hemithioacetal
are also required for production of the thioester product.
(16) MacBeth, C. E.; Gupta, R.; Mitchell-Koch, K. R.; Young, V. G., Jr.;
Lushington, G. H.; Thompson, W. H.; Hendrich, M. P.; Borovik, A. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2556-2567.
(10) (a) Kieber-Emmons, M. T.; Schenker, R.; Yap, G. P. A.; Brunold, T. C.;
Riordan, C. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6716-6718. (b) Ca´mpora,
J.; Palma, P.; del R´ıo, D.; Alvarez, E. Organometallics 2004, 23, 1652-
1655. (c) Ca´mpora, J.; Matas, I.; Palma, P.; Graiff, C.; Tiripicchio, A.
Organometallics 2005, 24, 2827-2830.
(17) Rudzka, K.; Arif, A. M.; Berreau, L. M. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 7234-
7242.
(18) Szajna, E.; Makowska-Grzyska, M. M.; Wasden, C. C.; Arif, A. M.;
Berreau, L. M. Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 7595-7605.
(11) Hall, S. S.; Poet, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1970, 2867-2868.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 128, NO. 51, 2006 17019