of Na2CO3 with pyridine as additive in toluene.8 The
dimeric product 4 was observed in many conditions, but
its formation was suppressed and the yield of 3a was
increased by using 5 equiv of nucleophile (Table 1, entry
similar reaction conditions. A wide range of primary
amides was found to undergo the reaction (Table 1, entries
8-16). The reaction with benzamide 2h using a catalytic
amount of Cu(OAc)2 formed product 3h; however, the
starting material 1 was not effectively consumed. This may
be due to the binding of Cu(II) to the carbonyl oxygen
and imino nitrogen in the product. This problem was
circumvented by using 2 equiv of Cu(OAc)2 (entry 8).
Both electron-withdrawing and electron-donating func-
tional groups are tolerated well on the aryl ring of the
amides (entries 9-12). Simple alkyl primary amides are
also substrates (entries 13 and 14), even ones with steric
bulk on the amide. Reactions of 1 with sulfonamides
resulted in excellent yields (entries 15 and 16), including
one with a bromine substituent on the aryl group. Although
reactions with amines under the same conditions provided
the desired products, the formation of the dimeric product
4 was significant, most likely due to strong electron
donation by the amine and the unfavorable deprotonation.
We also investigated the scope of this reaction with
other heterocyclic and aromatic C-H bonds (Table 2). In
the amidation reactions with pyrrolidinone 2a, the het-
erocyclic C-H bonds of benzothiazole, caffeine, and
oxazole all underwent oxidative coupling (entries 1-3).
Similar reactions with primary amide 2i were successful
(entries 4 and 5), and intramolecular reactions delivered
cyclic products with excellent yields (entries 6 and 7).
The reaction condition was also effective for the direct
amidation of C-H bonds in fluorinated aromatic rings,
albeit in diminished yields (entries 8-10). These trans-
formations offer successful examples of challenging
intermolecular C-N bond formation using aromatic C-H
and amide N-H groups. These amidation reactions
(entries 8-10) indicate the potential of this method in the
synthesis of fluorobenzene derivatives.
Although mechanisms of copper-catalyzed oxidative
C-N couplings have been proposed,6 the details remain
uncertain. A proposed mechanism for this amidation
reaction is outlined in Scheme 2. In the presence of Cu(II)
and base, we imagine that organocopper intermediate 1a
from the heterocycle (e.g., 1) is formed. Ligand exchange
with the deprotonated nucleophile would yield intermedi-
ate 1b. C-N reductive elimination and aerobic reoxidation
of the catalyst would complete the catalytic cycle.
Since the formation of 1b can compete with the formation
of 1c, dimer 4 will form when 1b is disfavored by slow
deprotonation (e.g., pKa > 25 or amine) or steric hindrance
(e.g., primary vs secondary amides). Reactions with pyridone
(pKa ) 17) and phthalimide (pKa ) 8.3) only resulted in the
Table 1. Cu(II)-Mediated Oxidative Coupling of 1 with
N-Nucleophilesa
a Reaction conditions for 2a-2g. Condition A: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (1.5
mmol), pyridine (6.0 mmol), Cu(OAc)2 (0.06 mmol), Na2CO3 (0.6 mmol),
toluene (10 mL), O2 (balloon), 120-140 °C, 12-30 h. For 2h-2p.
Condition B: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (1.5 mmol), pyridine (6.0 mmol), Cu(OAc)2
(0.6 mmol), Na2CO3 (0.9 mmol), toluene (10 mL), O2 (balloon), 120-140
°C, 12-30 h. b Yields correspond to isolated products. c Cu(OAc)2 (0.3
mmol). d 2g (0.6 mmol), pyridine (1.5 mmol). e Yield of product 3h under
condition A.
1). Among the Cu sources tested, Cu(OAc)2 generally
performed better than CuCl2, CuBr2, Cu(OTf)2, and
Cu(O2CCF3)2.
We next varied the nucleophiles in this reaction (Table
1). Cyclic amide (entries 2 and 3), urea and carbamate
(entries 4-6) nucleophiles, and N-methyl benzenesulfona-
mide (entry 7) provided the desired products effectively,
while acyclic secondary amides were not effective under
(7) For examples involving transition-metal-directed functionalization
of C-H bonds with heteroatoms, see: (a) Chen, X.; Hao, X.-S.; Goodhue,
C. E.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6790–6791. (b) Uemura, T.;
Imoto, S.; Chatani, N. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 842–843. Intramolecular: (c)
Brasche, G.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 1932–1934.
(d) Thu, H.-Y.; Yu, W.-Y.; Che, C.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 9048–
9049. (e) Wasa, M.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14058–14059.
(f) Inamoto, K.; Hasegawa, C.; Hiroya, K.; Doi, T. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
5147–5150. (g) Jordan-Hore, J. A.; Johansson, C. C. C.; Gulias, M.; Beck,
E. M.; Gaunt, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 16184–16186. (h) Ueda,
S.; Nagasawa, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6411–6413. (i) Mei,
T.-S.; Wang, X.; Yu, J.-Q. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 10806–10807.
(5) (a) Chan, D. M. T.; Monaco, K. L.; Wang, R. P.; Winters, M. P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2933–2936. (b) Lam, P. Y. S.; Clark, C. G.;
Saubern, S.; Adams, J.; Winters, M. P.; Chan, D. M. T.; Combs, A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2941–2944. (c) Evans, D. A.; Katz, J. L.; West,
T. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2937–2940.
(6) For a related reaction involving directed functionalization of C-H
bond with N-nucleophiles, see: (a) Hamada, T.; Ye, X.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 833–835. (b) Balsamo, A.; Macchia, B.; Macchia,
F.; Rossello, A.; Domiano, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 4141–4144. (c)
King, A. E.; Brunold, T. C.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131,
5044–5045.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 22, 2009
5179