COMMUNICATION
rich substituents in the C5 position resulted mostly in red-
shifted emission. For example, C5 phenyl, fluoro, chloro,
and cyano substituents resulted in complexes with emission
maxima at 550,7 535,8 540,2 and 520 nm,9 respectively. An
example of effective blue emission from an Alq3 derivative
is the C5 piperidine sulfonamide emitting at 480 nm.10
Recently, our group performed extensive studies aimed at
emission color tuning in Alq3-type materials.11 We used sim-
ple quinolinolate complexes with electron-donating or electron-
withdrawing aromatic moieties connected either directly12a
or via an acetylene spacer12b to the C5 of the ligand. We
have demonstrated that electron-deficient moieties cause a
blue shift in emission while the electron-donating substituents
result in red-shifted emission. We also showed that these
materials retain their semiconductor properties and may be
used for OLED fabrication.13
Figure 2. Structure of C5-substituted derivatives and 2Meq2AlOPh.
Unfortunately, none of the above efforts yielded a high-puri-
ty blue emitter, one with emission centered around 450-470
nm while possessing a high emission quantum yield. Such an
emitter, however, is required for the fabrication of full-color
displays to generate the red-green-blue signal.1 Also, re-
cently discovered high-efficacy (∼18%) white OLEDs for
interior lighting require a good-quality blue emitter.14 We have
realized that it is unlikely that a single substituent on the
quinolinolate ligand would exert such a strong effect to yield
a blue emitter of sufficient quality and that we may need to
use a combined effect of two substituents. The question was,
how much the substituent effects that modulate the quinolino-
late emission were additive, which is the subject of this study.
Here we explore the properties of fluorescent quinolinolate
complexes, in which the quinolinolate ligand bears two sub-
stituents to modulate the emission. First, we decided to use the
2-methyl substituent (2Meq), which is known to blue shift the
emission for ca. 0.2 eV compared to the parent Alq3 through
a combination of electronic and geometrical effects.2 The 2Meq
ligand, however, is too sterically demanding to form a tris-
complex. Therefore, the 2-methylquinolinolate complexes of
Al(III) are complexes comprising two 2Meq ligands and one
ancillary ligand. We used a phenolate as an ancillary ligand
and used the reaction of aluminum(III) phenoxide15 with two
2-methyl-8-hydroxyquinoline ligands and its C5-substituted
derivatives16 to prepare the complexes described in Figure 2.
The C5 substituents are divided into two groups: electron-
poor substituents were chosen to maximize the blue shift in
Figure 3. Top: Emission of 1a-f in CH2Cl2 solutions illuminated with
black light (365 nm). Bottom: Emission spectra of complexes 1a-f.
the emission, while the two electron-rich substituents were
included for the purpose of investigating the additivity of
the substituent effects. The 2-methyl induces a blue shift,
while the 5-phenyl and, namely, the 5-(4-dimethylaminophe-
nyl) induce a red shift.12,13
The substituent-mediated emission color tuning in com-
plexes 1a-f can be observed by a naked eye. Upon excitation
of CH2Cl2 solutions with black light (365 nm), complexes
1a-f show bright photoluminescence (PL) that shifts from
blue to green and red, depending on the electronic nature of
the aryl substituent (Figure 3).
Table 1 summarizes the properties of complexes 1a-f
determined from UV-visible and fluorescence measure-
ments. The data for the parent complex 2Meq2AlOPh
(substituent ) H) are also included for comparison.
The emission maxima of complexes 1a-f span over 120
nm between 455 and 575 nm, while showing strong emission
in the blue region of the visible light spectrum. In general,
we found that the C5 substituents provide a stronger
emission-tuning effect compared to 2-methyl. It appears that
the substituents on the phenoxide and pyridine rings induce
an additive effect on the emission wavelength. The combina-
(6) Kido, J.; Iizumi, Y. Chem. Lett. 1997, 963-964.
(7) Tokito, S.; Noda, K.; Tanaka, H.; Taga, Y.; Tsutsui, T. Synth. Met.
2000, 111-112, 393-396.
(8) Matsumura, M.; Akai, T. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 35, 5357-5360.
(9) Burrows, P. E.; Shen, Z.; Bulovic, V.; McCarty, D. M.; Forrest, S.
R.; Cronin, J. A.; Thompson, M. E. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 79, 7991-
8006.
(10) Hopkins, T. A.; Meerholz, K.; Shaheen, S.; Anderson, M. L.; Schmidt,
A.; Kippelen, B.; Padias, A. B.; Hall, H. K., Jr.; Peyghambarian, N.;
Armstrong, N. R. Chem. Mater. 1996, 8, 344-351.
(11) Montes, V. A.; Pohl, R.; Shinar, J.; Anzenbacher, P., Jr. Chem.sEur.
J. 2006, 17, 4523-4535.
(12) (a) Pohl, R.; Montes, V. A.; Shinar, J.; Anzenbacher, P., Jr. J. Org.
Chem. 2004, 69, 1723-1725. (b) Pohl, R.; Anzenbacher, P., Jr. Org.
Lett. 2003, 5, 2769-2772.
(15) This procedure is an adaptation of the method described in: Bryan,
P. S.; Lovecchio, F. V.; Van Slyke, S. A. U.S. Patent 5,141,671, 1992.
This method uses aluminum(III) isopropoxide.
(16) The synthesis of the C5-substituted 2-methyl-8-hydroxyquinoline
ligands used to synthesize 1a-f is reported in the Supporting
Information.
(13) Montes, V. A.; Pohl, R.; Li, G.; Shinar, J.; Anzenbacher, P., Jr. AdV.
Mater. 2004, 16, 2001-2003.
(14) Sun, Y.; Giebink, N. C.; Kanno, H.; Ma, B.; Thompson, M. E.; Forrest,
S. R. Nature 2006, 440, 908-912.
Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 45, No. 24, 2006 9611