Cheah et al.
LiBEt3H (1 M in THF, Aldrich) and p-toluenesulfonic acid, HOTs
(Merck), were obtained from commercial sources and used without
further purification. High-purity argon and nitrogen were obtained
from BOC Gases. Solvents were dried using standard procedures16
and distilled under an atmosphere of dinitrogen immediately prior
to use. Solutions used for electrochemical analysis were prepared
under a dinitrogen atmosphere either using standard Schlenk
techniques or with the aid of a Vacuum Atmospheres glove box.
The tetra-n-butlyammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) used
for electrochemical measurements was synthesized and purified
using standard procedures.17
system and to calibrate the computational approaches directed
toward the elucidation of the enzymatic reaction path.
The enzymatic mechanism of [FeFe] hydrogenase has been
investigated using density functional theory (DFT), and two
different descriptions have emerged.7 Either dihydrogen
activation occurs at the “vacant” apical site of the iron atom
most distant from the 4Fe4S cube of the H cluster,8,9 in which
case the rate of reaction might be accelerated by a bridging
dithiomethylamine cofactor,10 or the reaction occurs opposite
the bridging ligand between the two iron atoms of the 2Fe3S
subsite.7,11 Although the facile formation of hydride-bridged
compounds by protonation of electron-rich dithiolate-bridged
diiron compounds is well documented,2,12 recent studies by
Rauchfuss and co-workers of [Fe2(µ, µ-SCH2CH2S)H(CO)2-
(PMe3)4]+ show clearly that the form with a bridging hydride
is much more inert to protonation and hydrogen elimination
than is the isomer with a terminal hydride.13 Whereas the
mechanistic detail of this reaction has not been resolved, the
high kinetic activity of hydrogenase enzymes would, at first
sight, appear to be inconsistent with formation of a kinetically
inert hydride-bridged intermediate.
Electrochemistry and Spectroelectrochemistry (SEC). Cyclic
voltammetry experiments were controlled using an Autolab PG-
STAT30 potentiostat with GPES software and were carried out in
a one-compartment glass cell using a 1-mm vitreous carbon working
electrode, double-jacketed silver wire pseudo-reference electrode,
and platinum wire counter electrode. The potential of the reference
electrode was determined using the ferrocenium/ferrocene (Fc+/
Fc) couple, and all potentials are quoted relative to the SCE
reference electrode. Against this reference, the Fc+/Fc couple occurs
at +0.56 V in THF.18 Electrochemical simulations were carried
out using the program Digisim (version 3.03, Bioanalytical
Systems).19
The current work explores the influence of the 2Fe2X core
geometry on electrocatalytic proton reduction. The strategy
employed draws on the difference in reduction chemistry
for thiolato- and phosphido-bridged compounds where, for
the latter, there is a tendency to give a product with a planar
2Fe2P core geometry.14 For the reduced 2Fe2P species, the
core geometry can be constrained by incorporation of a
linking group between the phosphorus atoms. The first part
of the article is concerned with characterization of the
reduction products of the propylene-linked compound. The
influence of this structural constraint on the chemistry is then
examined with reference to electrocatalytic proton reduction.
Differences between the rates of dihydrogen evolution from
the doubly reduced and protonated phosphido- and thiolato-
bridged diiron compounds is then used to evaluate the
influence of the core geometry on the catalytic reaction and
to cast light on the reaction path. These results are then
considered in the context of the proposed reaction path for
the enzyme.
Spectroelectrochemical experiments were performed using a
previously described20 purpose-built cell. All experiments were
conducted using a 3-mm-diameter vitreous carbon working elec-
trode, a silver pseudo-reference electrode, and a platinum foil
counter electrode. A PAR model 362 potentiostat was used to
control the potential, and a Powerlab 4/20 interface with Chart
V4.12 software (ADInstruments) was used to monitor the potential
and current response during SEC experiments.
Continuous-flow electrosynthesis experiments were conducted
using a cell described in the literature21 that incorporates reticulated
vitreous carbon as the working and counter electrodes and a jacketed
silver wire as a pseudo-reference electrode. Standard liquid chro-
matography fittings in conjunction with narrow-bore (0.2-mm-i.d.)
Teflon tubing was used to transfer solutions from the syringe pump
to the electrosynthesis cell and then to the sample cells. The extent
of electrosynthesis was monitored by IR spectroscopy.
EXAFS Sample Preparation and Analysis. Fe K-edge (7111.2
eV) X-ray absorption measurements were conducted using the
bending magnet source of beamline 20B at the KEK Photon Factory
Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan. A channel-cut Si(111) monochromator
with energy resolution (∆E/E) of ca. 2.4 × 10-4 provided the source
of monochromatic radiation, where higher-order harmonics at the
selected wavelength were rejected by detuning the monochromator
Experimental Details
General Procedures. Samples of Fe2(µ, µ-PPh(CH2)3PPh)(CO)6,
3P were prepared using literature methods15 and confirmed to be
pure by spectroscopic and electrochemical analyses. Samples of
1
by a factor of /2. Solutions were measured in fluorescence mode
using a 36-element Ge detector (Canberra). Data analysis was
conducted using the XFIT suite of programs,22 which incorporates
FEFF version 6.01.23 Details of the procedures followed for the
(7) Zampella, G.; Greco, C.; Fantucci, P.; De Gioia, L. Inorg. Chem. 2006,
45, 4109-4118.
(8) Cao, Z.; Hall, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3734-3742. Liu,
Z.-P.; Hu, P. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 8177-8180.
(9) Liu, Z.-P.; Hu, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5175-5182.
(10) Fan, H.-J.; Hall, M. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3828-3829.
(11) Zhou, T.; Mo, Y.; Liu, A.; Zhou, Z.; Tsai, K. R. Inorg. Chem. 2004,
43, 923-930. Bruschi, M.; Fantucci, P.; De Gioia, L. Inorg. Chem.
2002, 41, 1421-149.
(16) Errington, R. J. Guide to Practical Inorganic and Organo-Metallic
Chemistry; Blackie Academic & Professional: London, 1997.
(17) Sawyer, D. T.; Sobkowiak, A.; Roberts, J. J. L. Electrochemistry for
Chemists, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1995.
(18) Connelly, N. G.; Geiger, W. E. Chem. ReV. 1996, 96, 877-910.
(19) Rudolph, M.; Reddy, D. P.; Feldberg, S. W. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66,
589A-600A.
(12) Arabi, M. S.; Mathieu, R.; Poilblanc, R. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979,
177, 199-209.
(20) Borg, S. J.; Best, S. P. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2002, 535, 57-64.
(21) Bondin, M. I.; Foran, G.; Best, S. P. Aust. J. Chem. 2001, 54, 705-
709.
(13) van der Vlugt, J. I.; Rauchfuss, T. B.; Whaley, C. M.; Wilson, S. R.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16012-16013.
(14) Ginsburg, R. E.; Rothrock, R. K.; Finke, R. G.; Collman, J. P.; Dahl,
L. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 6550-6562.
(22) Ellis, P. J. Xfit for Windows 95; Australian Synchrotron Research
Program: Sydney, Australia, 1996. Ellis, P. J.; Freeman, H. C. J.
Synchrotron Radiat. 1995, 2, 190-195.
(23) Zabinsky, S. I.; Rehr, J. J.; Ankudinov, A.; Albers, R. C.; Eller, M. J.
Phys. ReV. B: Condens. Matter Phys. 1995, 52, 2995-3009.
(15) Collman, J. P.; Rothrock, R. K.; Finke, R. G.; Moore, E. J.; Rose-
Munch, F. Inorg. Chem. 1982, 21, 146-156. Flood, T. C.; DiSanti,
F. J.; Campbell, K. D. Inorg. Chem. 1978, 17, 1643-1646.
1742 Inorganic Chemistry, Vol. 46, No. 5, 2007