starting colorless closed-forms either by heating or by
irradiation with a visible light (Scheme 1).4 Unfortunately,
simple derivatives of pyran such as benzopyrans exhibit
photochromism only at low temperatures (263-173 K);5
reversion of the open forms to the closed forms is too fast
in benzopyrans to preclude detection of the quinonoid
intermediates at the room temperature. In order to modify
the kinetic behavior of the photogenerated quinonoid inter-
mediates and to develop photochromic materials with
improved properties, various design strategies have been
explored.6
dered as to how the mesomeric effects transmitted by the
aryl substituents in 5-, 6-, and 7-arylbenzopyrans would
influence the photochromic behavior. Indeed, we were
inspired to investigate such effects based on the fact that a
library of diversely substituted molecules can be readily
accessed via Pd(0)-mediated Suzuki-coupling protocol.10
Herein, we demonstrate that substitution of the parent
benzopyran nucleus with aryl rings (see 5-7, Figure 1) leads
to dramatic modification of the photochromism via extended
π-conjugation.
The arylchromenes 5-7 were conveniently synthesized
starting from arylphenols, which were, in turn, prepared in
a facile manner by Suzuki coupling, see SI. Treatment of
the arylphenols with 1,1-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-ol in the
presence of PPTS (pyridinium p-toluenesulfonate) as a
catalyst in 1,2-dichloroethane afforded the aryl-substituted
chromenes 5-7 in respectable yields.
In the course of our recent studies on helical pyrans7 that
are photochromic, our attention was drawn toward indeno-
fused benzopyrans 1-3 (Figure 1), whose photogenerated
The X-ray crystal structure analyses carried out for
5-MetNap, 6-Nap, 6-DpaPh, and 7-MetNap show that the
angle between the planes of the aryl and the chromene rings
is maximum (ca. 42°) for 5-MetNap, while it varies from 6
to 32° for 6- and 7-aryl analogues (Figure 2). The theoretical
Figure 1. Structures of literature-reported indeno-fused chromenes
and presently examined arylchromenes.
quinonoid intermediates were reported to exhibit remarkable
variations in their absorption properties due to extended
π-conjugation.8 Given that the two phenyl rings in biphenyls
and the phenyl/naphthyl rings in R- and â-phenylnaphtha-
lenes9 are not entirely orthogonal, and that there exists only
a diminished conjugation between the two rings, we won-
Figure 2. X-ray determined molecular structures of arylchromenes.
Notice that the angle (θ/deg) between the planes of the benzene
part of the chromene ring and the aryl ring is larger for 5-aryl-
chromenes. The values in parentheses refer to the angles calculated
for AM1-minimized structures.
(2) (a) Photochromism: Molecules and Systems; Durr, H., Bouas-Laurent,
H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1990. (b) Organic Photochromic and
Thermochromic Compounds; Crano, J. C., Guglielmetti, R. J., Eds.; Plenum
Press: New York, 1999; Vols. 1 and 2.
AM1-calculated angles for the same molecules are relatively
higher, cf. Figure 2. As mentioned earlier, it is known that
the two phenyl rings in biphenyl are coplanar in the solid
state, while they are neither orthogonal nor coplanar in the
solution state.11 Therefore, although the angles between the
aryl rings as determined from X-ray studies as well as AM1
calculations are not necessarily applicable in the solution
state, they are otherwise a useful guide to gauge qualitatively
the inhibition of resonance in a closely related series. Based
on the angle between the planes, the steric inhibition of
(3) Crano, J. C.; Flood, T.; Knowles, D.; Kumar, A.; Gemert, B. V. Pure
Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 1395.
(4) Becker, R. S.; Michl, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 5931.
(5) Lenoble, C.; Becker, R. S. J. Photochem. 1986, 33, 187.
(6) (a) Pozzo, J.-L.; Lokshin, V.; Samat, A.; Guglielmetti, R.; Dubest,
R.; Aubard, J. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem. 1998, 114, 185. (b)
Olivera, M. M.; Salvador, M. A.; Coelho, P. J.; Carvalho, L. M. Tetrahedron
2005, 61, 1681 and references therein. (c) Coelho, P. J.; Carvalho, L. M.;
Abrantes, S.; Oliveira, M. M.; Olievera-Campos, A. M. F.; Samat, A.;
Guglielmetti, R. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 9505.
(7) Moorthy, J. N.; Venkatakrishnan, P.; Sengupta, S.; Baidya, M. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 4891.
(8) (a) Coelho, P. J.; Carvalho, L. M.; Rodrigues, S.; Olievera-Campos,
A. M. F.; Dubest, R.; Aubard, J.; Samat, A.; Guglielmetti, R. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 925 and references therein. (b) Martins, C. I.; Coelho, P. J.;
Carvalho, L. M.; Oliveira-Campos, A. M. F.; Samat, A.; Guglielmetti, R.
HelV. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 570.
(10) Miyaura, N. Top. Curr. Chem. 2002, 219, 11.
(11) Eliel, E. L.; Wilen, S. H.; Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of Organic
Compounds; John Wiley: New York, 1994; p 1146.
(9) Huang, H.; Drueckhammer, D. G. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2995.
920
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 5, 2007