4048
W. A. Carroll et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 4044–4048
9. Wang, X.; Arcuino, G.; Takano, T.; Lin, J.; Peng, W. G.;
Wan, P.; Li, P.; Xu, Q.; Liu, Q. S.; Goldman, S. A.;
Nedergaard, M. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 821.
10. Raghavendra, V.; DeLeo, J. A. Adv. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004,
31, 951.
2-methylbenzylamine (1.4 mL, 1.1equiv) were heated in
toluene (3 mL) for 2 days in a sealed tube at 100 ꢁC. The
reaction mixture was directly purified by silica gel flash
chromatography eluting with 3% MeOH/EtOAC to pro-
vide 1.64 g (49%) of compound 12 as a tan solid.
23. Reverse phase HPLC conditions: waters symmetry C8
column (40 mm · 100 mm, 7 lm particle size) using a
gradient of 10–100% acetonitrile: 0.1% aqueous TFA over
12 min (15 min run time) at a flow rate of 70 mL/min.
Silica gel flash column chromatography conditions for
compound 12: 3% MeOH/EtOAc.
24. The 1,5-pyrazole regioisomer 11 was the main product in
the reaction although the 1,3-regioisomer was also formed
as a minor product (6%). The structural assignment was
confirmed by NMR studies showing NOE between the
benzylic protons and the ortho-proton of the 2,3-dichlor-
ophenyl group for 11 whereas this NOE was absent for the
minor 1,3-regioisomer. The regiochemistry for the triazole
6 was assigned by analogy to Lin, Y.-i.; Lang, S. A.;
Lovell, M. F.; Perkinson, N. A. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44,
4160.
11. Milligan, E. D.; Maier, S. F.; Watkins, L. R. Sem. Pain
Med. 2003, 1, 171.
12. Labasi, J. M.; Petrushova, N.; Donovan, C.; McCurdy, S.;
Lira, P.; Payette, M. M.; Brissette, W.; Wicks, J. R.;
Audoly, L.; Gabel, C. A. J. Immunol. 2002, 168, 6436.
13. Chessell, I. P.; Hatcher, J. P.; Bountra, C.; Michel, A. D.;
Hughes, J. P.; Green, P.; Egerton, J.; Murfin, M.;
Richardson, J.; Peck, W. L.; Grahames, C. B. A.; Casula,
M. A.; Yiangou, Y.; Birch, R.; Anand, P.; Buell, G. N.
Pain 2005, 114, 386.
14. Baraldi, P. G.; Romagnoli, R.; Tabrizi, M. A.; Falzoni, S.;
DiVirgilio, F. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 681.
15. Ravi, R. G.; Kertesy, S. B.; Dubyak, G. R.; Jacobsen, K.
A. Drug Dev. Res. 2001, 54, 75.
16. Chen, W.; Ravi, R. G.; Kertesy, S. B.; Dubyak, G. R.;
Jacobsen, K. A. Bioconjugate Chem. 2002, 13, 1100.
17. Baraldi, P. G.; del Carmen Nunez, M.; Morelli, A.;
Falzoni, S.; DiVirgilio, F.; Romagnoli, R. J. Med. Chem.
2003, 46, 1318.
18. Baxter, A.; Bent, J.; Bowers, K.; Braddock, M.; Brough,
S.; Fagura, M.; Lawson, M.; McInally, T.; Mortimore,
M.; Robertson, M.; Weaver, R.; Webborn, P. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 4047.
25. Diez-Barra, E.; Hoz, A. de la; Sanchez-Migallon, A.;
Tejeda, J. Synth. Commun. 1993, 23, 1783.
26. Compound 10 was purified using the HPLC conditions
described above in footnote 23. The analogous Suzuki
reaction using 5-bromo-1-(2-methyl-benzyl)-1H-imidazole
rather than 5-bromo-1-benzyl-1H-imidazole provided the
product in improved yield (25%) using silica gel chroma-
tography (70:29:1 EtOAc:Hex:Et3N) to purify the
product.
27. Attempts to form the HCl salt of N-indanyl analogs like
32 resulted in some decomposition, presumably due to an
E1-type process. By contrast, compound 12 was stable to
such treatment and the HCl salt was crystallized from
Et2O/EtOH.
19. Alcaraz, L.; Baxter, A.; Bent, J.; Bowers, K.; Braddock,
M.; Cladingboel, D.; Donald, D.; Fagura, M.; Furber, M.;
Laurent, C.; Lawson, M.; Mortimore, M.; McCormick,
M.; Roberts, N.; Robertson, M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2003, 13, 4043.
20. Gargett, C. E.; Wiley, J. S. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1997, 120,
1483.
21. (a) Nelson, D. W.; Gregg, R. J.; Kort, M. E.; Perez-
Medrano, A.; Voight, E. A.; Wang, Y.; Grayson, G.;
Namovic, M. T.; Donnelly-Roberts, D. L.; Niforatos, W.;
Honore, P.; Jarvis, M. F.; Faltynek, C. R.; Carroll, W. A.
J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3659; (b) Honore, P.; Donnelly-
Roberts, D.; Namovic, M. T.; Hsieh, G.; Zhu, C. Z.;
Mikusa, J. P.; Hernandez, G.; Zhong, C.; Gauvin, D. M.;
Chandran, P.; Harris, R.; Perez Medrano, A.; Carroll, W.;
Marsh, K.; Sullivan, J. P.; Faltynek, C. R.; Jarvis, M. F.
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2006, 319, 1376.
28. Kim, S. H.; Chung, J. M. Pain 1992, 50, 355.
29. Compound 12 was administered at a dose of 5 lmol/kg for
the pharmacokinetics study. The following additional
pharmacokinetic parameters were measured for com-
pound 12. Oral bioavailability = 15%; clearance
(iv) = 3.1 L/h/kg; Vb = 1.9 L/kg; Tmax (ip) = 0.33 h; Cmax
(ip) = 0.21 lg/mL.
30. Compound 12 was profiled across a range of ion channels
and receptors at Cerep and was found to interact
significantly only with the peripheral benzodiazepine site
(86% @ 10 lM). Compound 12 was also inactive at P2X1,
P2X2, P2X2/3, P2X4, P2Y1, and P2Y2 receptors at 10 lM.
22. A typical experimental procedure goes as follows: 2-(2,3-
dichloro-phenyl)-[1,3,4]oxadiazole (2.28 g, 10.6 mmol) and