DOI: 10.1039/C3GC41302K
Green Chemistry
Table 7 Comparison of the catalytic activity of the nanozeolite CP with some reported catalysts for the synthesis of 6a
Temp
(°C)
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
90
Reflux
Reflux
Reflux
r.t.
Time
(min)
15
30
Yield
(%)
Entry
Ref
Catalyst
55
60
65
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
LiBr, H2O, 0.02 gr
95
94
88
94
94
98
97
97
94
90
98
37
31d
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
-
Tetrabutylammoniumfluoride (TBAF), H2O, 10 mol%
Nickel nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2.6H2O), H2O, 10 mol%
Triethylbenzylammonium chloride (TEBA), H2O, 100 mol%
1,4-Diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO), H2O, 10 mol%
poly(4-vinylpyridine)/MCM-48 (P4VP/MCM-48), H2O, 0.12 gr
Na2SeO4, EtOH/H2O, 0.1 gr
20
420
120
120
60
120
60
5
(NH4)2HPO4, H2O, 0.013 gr or 10 mol%
Lipase, EtOH/H2O, 0.03 gr
r.t.
r.t.
Reflux
N-Methylimidazole, H2O, 20 mol%
Nanozeolite CP, H2O, 0.01 gr
10
11
90
15
70
10 4. Conclusions
6. M. Brunavs, C.P. Dell, P.T. Gallagher, W.M. Owton and C.W.
Smith, Eur. Pat. Appl. EP 557075 A1 19930825, 1993.
7. S.J. Mohr, M.A. Chirigos, F.S. Fuhrman and J.W. Pryor, Cancer
Res. 1975, 35, 3750-3754.
8. K. Gorlitzer, A. Dehre and E. Engler, Arch. Pharm. Weinheim Ger.
1983, 316, 264-270.
We have introduced a one pot and applicable procedure for
preparation of novel and highly efficient method for the
synthesis of 2-amino-4H-chromene derivatives in the presence
of the nanozeolite clinoptilolite as a green heterogeneous
15 reusable natural catalyst in aqueous media. Herein, we
employed this valuable and reusable catalyst for the synthesis
of biological and pharmaceutical compounds, 2-amino-4H-
chromene derivatives and demonstrated its preference to other
catalysts. This method has the advantages of high yield, simple
20 methodology, green reaction conditions and easy work-up in
which the chromatographic separation is not necessary to get
the pure compounds. Moreover, from the both industrial and
economical point of view, low cost as well as promoting the
chemical transformations with appreciable conversion of the
25 substrates are the main goals, which we achieved by using this
nanocatalyst. So, the proposed methodology to use the
nanozeolite clinoptilolite with attractive capabilities was
accomplished.
75
9. a) L. Alvey, S. Prado, V. Huteau, B. Saint-Joanis, S. Michel,
M.
Koch, S.T. Cole, F. Tillequin and Y.L. Janin, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2008, 16, 8264–8272; b) T. Symeonidis, M. Chamilos, D.J.
Hadjipavlou-Litina, M. Kallitsakis and K.E. Litinas, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1139-1142.
80
10. F. Eiden and F. Denk, Arch. Pharm. Weinheim Ger. 1991, 324
353–354.
,
85 11. E.A.A. Hafez, M.H. Elnagdi, A.G.A. Elagamey and F.M.A.A. El-
Taweel, Heterocycles 1987, 26, 903-907.
12. G.P. Ellis, In the Chemistry of Heterocyclic of Compounds.
Chromenes, Harmones and Chromones; Weissberger, A., Taylor,
E. C., Eds.; John Wiley: New York, NY, 1977; Chapter II, pp 11-
90
13.
13. R. Ballini, G. Bosica, L.M. Conforti, R. Maggi, A. Mazzacani,
Righi and G. Sartori, Tetrahedron 2001, 57, 1395-1398.
P.
14. M. Al-Matar, K.D. Khalil, H. Meier, H. Kolshorn and M.H
.
Elnagdi, Arkivoc 2008, xvi, 288-301.
95 15. R. Ballini, F. Bigi, M.L. Conforti, D.D. Santis, R. Maggi, G. Oppici
Acknowledgments
and G. Sartori, Catal. Today 2000, 60, 305-309.
16. Z. Zhou, F. Yang, L. Wu and A. Zhang, Chem. Sci. Trans. 2012, 1,
30 This research was supported by the Islamic Azad University,
Ayatollah Amoli Branch, Iran.
57-60.
17. M. Kidwai, S. Saxena, M.K. Rahman Khan and S.S. Thukral,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15, 4295-4298.
18. M.R. Naimi-jamal, S. Mashkouri and A. Sharifi, Mol. Divers. 2010,
14, 473-477.
19. D. Kumar, V.B. Reddy, G.B. Mishra, R.K. Rann, M.N. Nadagouda
and R.S. Varma, Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 3093-3097.
100
References
1. a) R. Sersale, Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1985, 24, 503-512; b) J.E.
Naber, K.P. De Jong, W.H.J. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1994, 84C,
35
2197-2220.
105 20. M.M. Heravi, K. Bakhtiari, V. Zadsirjan and F.F. Bamoharram,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 4262-4265.
2. D.W. Breck, “Zeolite Molecular Sieve Structure”, Chemistry and
Use, Wiley Interscience, New York, 1974.
3. M.W. Ackley, S.U. Rege and H. Saxena, Micropor. Mesopor. Mat.
2003, 61, 25-42.
21. M.P. Surpur, S. Kshirsagar and S. Samant, Tetrahedron Lett. 2009,
50, 719-722.
22. B.S. Kumar, N. Shrinvasulu, R.H. Udupi, B. Rajitha, Y.T. Reddy,
P.N. Reddy and P.S. Kumar, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 2006, 43, 1691-
1693.
23. M.M. Heravi, B. Baghernejad and H.A. Oskooie, J. Chin. Chem.
Soc. 2008, 55, 659-662.
24. J.F. Zhou, S.J. Tu, Y. Gao and M. Ji, Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 21,
40 4. D. Kallo, J. Papp and J. Valyon Zeolites 1982, 2, 13-16.
110
5. a) A.M. El-Agrody, M.H. El-Hakium, M.S. Abd El-Latif, A.H
.
Fekry, E.S.M. El-Sayed and K.A. El-Gareab, Acta. Pharm. 2000,
50, 111–120; b) M.C. Yimdjo, A.G. Azebaze, A.E. Nkengfack, M.
Meyer, B. Bodo and Z.T. Fomum, Phytochem. 2004, 65, 2789–
2795; c) Z.Q. Xu, K. Pupek, W.J. Suling, L. Enache and M.T.
Flavin, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 4610-4626; d) V. Jeso and
K.C. Nicolaou, Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 1161–1163.
45
50
115
120
742-745.
25. K. Rad-Moghadam and L. Yoseftabar-Miri, Tetrahedron 2011, 67,
5693-5699.
26. Y. Peng and G. Song, Catal. Commun. 2007, 8, 111-114.
27. M.J. Khurana, B. Nand and P. Saluja, Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 5637-
5641.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 | 13