much more negative potentials than 1 [For 3, E1/2 (DMF) )
-1.11 V vs Ag/AgCl/KCl (sat)] (Scheme 1).7
to afford a benzylic anion, rather than from the 2-position
of the ring. Such exocyclic deprotonations have literature
precedent.9 However, selective base-induced proton exchange
in the 2-position of pyridinium salts has been shown under
some conditions.10 To make the proposed electron donor as
electron-rich as possible, dimethylamino analogue 10 was
selected for synthesis. This molecule has the advantage of
four nitrogen atoms, each of which adds electron density to
the π-system.
Scheme 1. Strong Donors 1 and 3, Their Formation, and Their
Reactivity
Diiodide 7b was easily prepared from reaction of the easily
available and economical 4-dimethylaminopyridine11 with
1,3-diiodopropane. The crucial questions were (i) whether
7b could be selectively deprotonated to afford a carbene 8
and (ii) whether such a carbene would undergo nucleophilic
attack on the adjacent pyridinium ring, ultimately leading
to 10. (In this regard, our attempts to prepare 13 by
deprotonation of bisimidazolium salt 12 had failed,12,13
whereas deprotonation of 2 to form 3 had proceeded in
high yield.5 Clearly, in that case, the presence of two
trimethylene bridges had been necessary to create the reactive
alkene.)
To test our case, 7b was now treated with NaH in liquid
ammonia. Evaporation of the ammonia, followed by extrac-
tion with diethyl ether and solvent removal,5 afforded air-
sensitive bispyridinylidene 10 (83%) as a purple solid. 13C
Although 3 is an excellent electron donor, development
of more powerful bisimidazolylidene electron donors related
to 3 would be nontrivial. To avoid isomeric mixtures of
imidazole-derived donors, and thereby develop donors that
can be precisely characterized, symmetrical 4,5-disubstituted
imidazoles would be needed as synthetic precursors. How-
ever, the available range of such imidazoles is limited, and
so the attractions of developing the bisimidazolylidene
nucleus recede.
Accordingly, we set out to find alternatives to imidazoles
as the basis of S.E.D. reagents that would be capable of
reducing aryl halides and other difficult substrates; this paper
announces our success in developing a new structural motif
for that purpose through the same convenient deprotonation
route routinely used for the preparation of bisimida-
zolylidenes and used above in the preparation of donor 3
from 2.5
1
NMR and H NMR spectra supported its structural assign-
ment with the central alkene carbons resonating at δ 116
ppm. It was further characterized by reaction with iodine to
afford the diiodide 11. Here, the NCH2 protons show
nonequivalence, and their diastereotopic nature must reflect
the nonplanarity of the positively charged ring systems as
the two rings twist to avoid interaction. This is analogous to
the dication derived from 14 but entirely different to the
essentially planar dication 5 derived from 3.5
Electrochemical characterization of 10 showed a single
reversible two-electron peak at E1/2 (DMF) ) -1.13 V vs
Ag/AgCl/KCl (sat), and hence this molecule is as strong a
donor as compound 3. However, whereas cyclic voltammetry
of compound 3 showed two electron-transfer steps at almost
identical potentials (a shoulder appears on the peak in both
oxidative and reductive mode, implying that the loss of its
second electron is only slightly more difficult than its first),
compound 10 showed a clean, single two-electron peak,
indicating that the loss of the second electron occurs at
essentially the same potential as the first, under the conditions
of the experiment (see Figure 1).14
Our primary focus was on pyridine-based structures. In
principle, bispyridinylidene 68 might be formed through
deprotonation of a bridged bispyridinium salt 7a. However,
the 2-position of pyridinium salts will be less acidic than
the 2-position of imidazolium salts, and it was very possible
that deprotonation would occur from the trimethylene bridge,
(6) Literature measurements of the redox potentials of the bromide
salt analogous to 3, E1/2 (MeCN)7a ) -1.18 V and -1.37 V (ir) vs.
S.C.E., where “ir” represents an irreversible step; E1/2 (DMF)7a
)
-1.20 V vs. S.C.E.; and E1/2 (MeCN)7b ) -1.12 V and -1.28 V (ir) vs
S.C.E.].
(9) (a) King, L. C.; Brownell, W. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 2507-
2508. (b) Katritzky, A. R.; Chermprapai, A.; Patel, R. C.; Tarraga-Tomas,
A. J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 492-497. (c) Kro¨hnke, F. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 1963, 2, 225-238.
(10) (a) Obaid, A. Y.; Soliman, M. S. Spectrochim. Acta 1990, 46A,
1779-1791. (b) Kawazoe, Y.; Ohnishi, M.; Yoshioka, Y. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1964, 12, 1384-1386.
(11) Spivey, A. C.; Arseniyadis, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
5436-5441.
(12) Thomson, D. W. Ph.D. thesis, Universirty of Strathclyde, 2005.
(13) The delicate balance between tetrazaalkenes and imidazolylidene
precursors is seen in ref 7c. (See also Hahn, F. E.; Wittenbecher, L.; Le
Van, D.; Fro¨hlich, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 541-544).
(14) For a discussion of 2-electron transfer, see: Evans, D. H.; Hu, K.
J. Chem. Soc., Fraraday Trans. 1996, 92, 3983-3990.
(7) (a) Ames, J. R.; Houghtaling, M. A.; Terrian, D. L.; Mitchell,
T. A. Can. J. Chem. 1997, 75, 28-36. (b) Thummel, R. P.; Goulle,
V.; Chen, B. J. Org. Chem. 1989, 54, 3057-3061. (c) Taton, T. A.; Chen,
P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1011-1013. (d) Hu¨nig, S.;
Sheutzov, D.; Schlaf, H. Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1972, 765, 126-
132.
(8) Alternative routes to bis-2-pyridinylidenes are known through reduc-
tion of pyridine-borane complexes and of 2,2-bipy salts: (a) Koester, R.;
Bellut, H.; Ziegler, E. Angew. Chem. 1967, 79, 241-242. (b) Kuck, M. A.;
Urry, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88, 426-431. (c) Maeda, K.; Matsuyama,
Y.; Isozaki, K.; Yamada, S.; Mori, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1996,
121-126. (d) Hu¨nig, S.; Gross, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9, 2599-
2604.
1228
Org. Lett., Vol. 10, No. 6, 2008