JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2009 335
NH2
NH2
N
Silica-supported
conditions
N
N
CN
CN
Ar
+
Ar
Ar
Ar
+
N
H
1
4
5
3
single
none
Scheme 6
Silica-supported
90oC 0.5-1h
NH2
NH2
N
COOH
+
N
H
4
1
6
Scheme 7
Surprisingly we found that the o-phenylenediamine reacted
with arylmethylene-malononitriles (Scheme 6) using the
grinding technique to give excellent yields of a single desired
product with a 1:1 mol ratio of reactions. With two equivalents
of arylmethylene-malononitriles, an extra reductive product
was formed.28 It was interesting that most of the 2-substituted
benzimidazoles were obtained in slightly higher yields
(e.g. 4a, 4h, 4k and 4l Table 3). This is presumably due to
the better stability of aryl-methylenemalononitriles compared
to some aldehydes. This reaction had excellent selectivity
and no product 5 was detected. Benzoic acid was also used to
investigate the scope of this method, but no desired product
was obtained either by the grinding or microwave-assisted
technique (Scheme 7).
In summary, we have reported alternative and highly efficient
methods for the synthesis of benzimidazoles under solvent-
and catalyst-free conditions. The desired benzimidazoles were
obtained in good to excellent yields. The notable advantages
of this procedure include the substrates being loaded onto
silica gel without any other catalyst (using atmospheric air as
the oxidant). No toxic reagent(s) were involved, and there was
a simple work-up procedure. The method is environmentally
friendly, and possesses high generality. The study of the
potential bioactivities of these benzimidazole derivatives are
in progress in our laboratory.
Table 3 The synthesis of benzimidazole using arylmethylene-
malononitrilesa,b
Entry
Ar =
Time/h
Yield/%
Product
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Ph
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
92
95
90
87
94
91
90
88
88
86
4a
4b
4e
4f
4g
4h
4i
4j
4k
4l
4-ClC6H4
2-Cl-,6-FC6H3
3-NO2C6H4
4-CNC6H4
4-OHC6H4
4-CH3C6H4
3-CH3OC6H4
3,4-(CH3) 2C6H3
2-Thiophene
aReaction conditions: 1 (1.0 mmol), 3 (1.0 mmol), the reactions
were carried out under intermittent grinding at 90°C for 0.5 h.
bThe reaction was monitored by TLC.
directly purified by column chromatography with EtOAc–petroleum
ether (1:5) to afford compounds 4a–m.
2-Phenylbenzimidazole (4a): Colourless solid; m.p. 295–296°C
1
(Lit.23 295°C). H NMR d: 7.21 (d, 2H, J = 4.8 Hz), 7.48–7.58 (m,
4H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 8.18 (d, 2H, J = 8.0 Hz), 12.91 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
d: 122.1, 126.4, 128.4, 128.9, 129.2, 129.8, 130.1, 151.2. MS (ESI):
m/z = 195 (M+ + 1).
2-(4-Chlorophenyl)benzimidazole (4b): White solid; m.p. 292–
294°C (Lit.22 292–294°C). 1H NMR d: 7.22 (d, 2H, J = 6.2 Hz),
7.63–7.70 (m, 4H), 8.19 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz), 12.99 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
d: 111.4, 118.9, 121.9, 122.5, 128.1, 129.0, 134.5, 150.1. MS (ESI):
m/z = 231 ([M+ + 2], 33), 229 ([M+ + 1], 100).
Experimental
2-(4-Fluorophenyl)benzimidazole (4c): White solid; m.p. 250–
252°C (Lit.22 250–251°C). 1H NMR d: 7.21 (dd, 2H, J1 = 7.2,
J2 = 9.2 Hz), 7.39–7.43 (m, 2H), 7.54 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.67 (d,
1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 8.21–8.25 (m, 2H), 12.92 (s, 1H). 13C NMR d: 111.3,
115.9, 116.1, 118.8, 121.7, 122.5, 126.8, 128.7, 128.8, 135.0, 143.8,
150.4, 163.1 (d, J = 246.5 Hz). MS (EI): m/z (%) = 212 (M+, 100).
2-(3-Bromophenyl)benzimidazole (4d): White solid; m.p. 250–
251°C. 1H NMR d: 7.20–7.27 (m, 2H), 7.51–7.56 (m, 2H), 7.69 (t, 1H,
J = 6.4 Hz), 8.19 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.38 (s, 1H), 13.05 (s, 1H). 13C NMR
d: 111.4, 119.0, 121.9, 122.2, 122.9, 125.3, 128.8, 131.1, 132.4, 134.9,
143.6, 149.6. MS (EI): m/z (%) = 274 ([M+ + 2], 90), 272 (M+,100).
2-(2-Chloro-6-fluorophenyl)benzimidazole (4e): Pale yellow
The NMR spectra were measured with a Bruker Advance III 500
or Varian Mercury Plus-400 instrument using TMS as an internal
standard and DMSO as the solvent. Mass spectra were measured
with a Finnigan Trace DSQ spectrometer, HRMS analysis was
measured on an Agilent 6210. Melting points (m.p.) were recorded
on digital melting point apparatus WRS-1B and uncorrected. Flash
column chromatography was carried out on 200–300 mesh silica gel.
Microwave assisted reactions were carried out in an APEX reactor.
General experimental procedure for the synthesis of 4a–m:
(arylaldehydes as the reagents)
o-Phenylenediamine (1.0 mmol) and benzaldehyde 2a (1.1 mmol)
were ground in a mortar with 0.4 g silica gel (200–300 mesh) each
to give a homogeneous mixture. The two mixtures were combined
and ground intermittently at 90°C or reacted under microwave-
irradiation for an appropriate time given in Table 2 in the presence
of air. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the
reaction and cooling to room temperature, the residue was directly
purified by column chromatography with EtOAc–petroleum ether
(1:5) to afford compounds 4a and 5a.
1
solid; m.p. 217–219°C. H NMR d: 7.22–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.46 (t, 1H,
J = 8.4 Hz), 7.54–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.62–7.68 (m, 1H), 7.72 (d, 1H,
J = 8.0 Hz), 12.90 (s, 1H). 13C NMR d: 111.5, 114.7, 114.9, 119.2,
119.7, 119.9, 121.6, 122.8, 125.8 (d, J = 2.3 Hz), 132.5 (d, J = 9.1 Hz),
134.2 (d, J = 5.3 Hz), 143.4 (d, J = 24.2 Hz), 160.7 (d, J = 248.7 Hz).
MS (EI): m/z (%) = 248 ([M+ + 2], 33), 246 (M+, 100). HRMS (ESI):
Calcd for (C13H8ClFN2 + H) 247.0438. Found 247.0433.
2-(3-Nitrophenyl)benzimidazole (4f): Yellow solid; m.p. 203–
1
205°C (Lit.30 202–203°C). H NMR d: 7.26 (s, 2H), 7.60 (s, 1H),
General experimental procedure for the synthesis of 4a–m:
(arylmethylene–malononitriles as the reagents)
7.72 (s, 1H), 7.87 (t, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 8.34 (d, 1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.62
(d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 9.02 (s, 1H), 13.30 (s, 1H). 13C NMR d: 111.7,
119.2, 120.8, 122.1, 123.2, 124.2, 130.6, 131.7, 132.5, 148.3, 149.0.
MS (ESI): m/z = 240 (M+ + 1).
2-(4-Cyanophenyl)benzimidazole (4g): White solid; m.p. 262–
263°C (Lit.30 262°C). 1H NMR d: 7.26 (s, 2H), 7.65 (s, 2H), 8.04 (d,
2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 8.35 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 13.20 (s, 1H). 13C NMR d:
o-Phenylenediamine (1.0 mmol) and aryl-methylenemalononitriles
3a (1.0 mmol) were ground in a mortar with 0.4 g silica gel (200–
300 mesh) each to give a homogeneous mixture. The two mixtures
were combined and ground intermittently for 0.5 h at 90°C in the
presence of air. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion
of the reaction and cooling to room temperature, the residue was