A highly stereoselective synthesis of (-)-(ent)-julifloridine from the cyclization of an alanine-derived chloroamine with an acetylenic sulfone

Article abstract of DOI:10.1021/jo0703101

(Chemical Equation Presented) The cyclization of γ-chloroamine 11, derived from L-alanine, and acetylenie sulfone 12 afforded the dehydropiperidine 19 via conjugate addition followed by intramolecular alkylation of the corresponding sulfone-stabilized ani

Full text of DOI:10.1021/jo0703101

A Highly Stereoselective Synthesis of (-)-(ent)-Julifloridine from the
Cyclization of an Alanine-Derived Chloroamine with an Acetylenic
Sulfone
Huimin Zhai, Masood Parvez, and Thomas G. Back*
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, T2N 1N4
tgback@ucalgary.ca
ReceiVed February 14, 2007
The cyclization of γ-chloroamine 11, derived from L-alanine, and acetylenic sulfone 12 afforded the
dehydropiperidine 19 via conjugate addition followed by intramolecular alkylation of the corresponding
sulfone-stabilized anion. An unexpected acid-catalyzed desulfonylation of 19 occurred in one step via
desilylation and tautomerization of the enamine moiety to the corresponding aldehyde, followed by
elimination of p-toluenesulfinic acid. The highly stereoselective reduction of the resulting unsaturated
aldehyde 25 with sodium cyanoborohydride produced piperidine 23 with a diastereomeric ratio of >98:
2. (-)-(ent)-Julifloridine (8) was obtained by Swern oxidation of 23, followed by Wittig olefination and
hydrogenation/debenzylation.
Introduction
either the 2,6-cis or 2,6-trans substitution pattern have been
discovered, in addition to ones with 3R- and 3â-configurations.
Members of this class are reported to display a wide range of
bioactivities,3 including inhibitory activity toward acetylcholine
esterase,3a as well as cytotoxic,3b antibacterial,3c-f antimycotic3c,e
and DNA-binding activity.3g Juliflorine (2) and julifloricine (3),
the main alkaloids of Prosopis juliflora, as well as the less
abundant alkaloid (+)-julifloridine (4), were first isolated by
Ahmad et al.4 The absolute stereochemistry of 4 was deduced
to be 2R,3R,6R,5 based on a comparison of its 13C NMR
2,6-Disubstituted piperidinols (1) occur widespread in nature,
particularly among the alkaloids of various species of the plant
genera Cassia and Prosopis.1,2 Numerous compounds possessing
* Address correspondence to T.G. Back, Tel.: (403) 220-6256, Fax: (403)
289-9488.
(1) For selected reviews of piperidine alkaloids, see: (a) Strunz, G. M.;
Findlay, J. A. In The Alkaloids; Brossi, A., Ed.; Academic Press: New
York, 1985; Vol. 26, pp 89-183. (b) Fodor, G. B.; Colasanti, B. In
Alkaloids: Chemical and Biological PerspectiVes; Pelletier, S. W., Ed.;
Wiley: New York, 1985; Vol. 3, pp 1-90. (c) Angle, S. R.; Breitenbucher,
J. G. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem. 1995, 16, 453-502. (d) Schneider, M. J.
Alkaloids: Chem. Biol. Perspect. 1996, 10, 155-299. (e) Andersen, R. J.;
Van Soest, R. W. M.; Kong, F. Alkaloids: Chem. Biol. Perspect. 1996, 10,
301-355. (f) Ojima, I.; Iula, D. M. Alkaloids: Chem. Biol. Perspect. 1999,
13, 371-412. (g) Plunkett, O.; Sainsbury, M. In Rodd’s Chemistry of Carbon
Compounds, 2nd ed.; Sainsbury, M., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1998; Part
F/Part G (partial)), pp 365-421. (h) Rodriguez, J. Stud. Nat. Prod. Chem.
2000, 24 (Part E), 573-681.
(2) For selected reviews of the synthesis of piperidines, see: (a) Buffat,
M. G. P. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 1701-1729. (b) Felpin, F.-X.; Lebreton,
J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 3693-3712. (c) Weintraub, P. M.; Sabol, J.
S.; Kane, J. M.; Borcherding, D. R. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2953-2989.
(d) Laschat, S.; Dickner, T. Synthesis 2000, 13, 1781-1813. (e) Baliah,
V.; Jeyaraman, R.; Chandrasekaran, L. Chem. ReV. 1983, 83, 379-423.
(3) (a) Choudhary, M. I.; Nawaz, S. A.; Zaheer-ul-Haq; Azim, M. K.;
Ghayur, M. N.; Lodhi, M. A.; Jalil, S.; Khalid, A.; Ahmed, A.; Rode, B.
M.; Atta-ur-Rahman; Gilani, A.-H.; Ahmad, V. U. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 2005, 332, 1171-1179. (b) Bolzani, V. S.; Gunatilaka, A. A. L.;
Kingston, D. G. I. Tetrahedron 1995, 51, 5929-5934. (c) Sansores-Peraza,
P.; Rosado-allado, M.; Brito-Loeza, W.; Mena-Rejo´n, G. J.; Quijano, L.
Fitoterapia 2000, 71, 690-692. (d) Aqeel, A.; Khursheed, A. K.; Viqarud-
din, A. Arzneimittel Forsch. 1991, 41, 151-154. (e) Aqeel, A.; Khursheed,
A. K.; Viqaruddin, A.; Sabiha, Q. Arzneimittel Forsch. 1989, 39, 652-
655. (f) Ahmad, A.; Khan, K. A.; Ahmad, V. U.; Qazi, S. Planta Med.
1986, 4, 285-288. (g) Luis, A. S.; Karin, J. S.; Schmeda-Hirschmann, G.;
Griffith, G. A.; Holt, D. J.; Jenkins, P. R. Planta Med. 1999, 65, 161-162.
(4) Ahmad, V. U.; Basha, A.; Haque, W. Z. Naturforsch., B: Anorg.
Chem., Org. Chem. 1978, 33B, 347-348.
10.1021/jo0703101 CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/17/2007
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 3853-3858
3853

Zhai et al.
SCHEME 1
spectrum with that of iso-6-cassine (5), but it was not possible
to distinguish between structures 3a and 3b for julifloricine.
Two alkaloids named juliprosopine6a and juliprosine6b were later
isolated from Prosopis juliflora by Hesse and co-workers.
Juliprosopine proved to be identical to juliflorine (2),3f while
2, juliprosine (6), 3′-oxojuliprosine (7), and several congeners
showed growth inhibitory activity against both monocotyledon-
ous and dicotyledonous plants.7 The first syntheses of 2 and 6
were reported recently by Snider and Neubert,8 who also
assigned the indicated stereochemistry to the indolizidine moiety
of 2.
SCHEME 2
antipode of the naturally occurring alkaloid 4, from L-alanine.
Since D-alanine is also readily available, our approach should
serve equally for the preparation of the (+)-enantiomer 4.
Results and Discussion
The general approach to 8 is shown retrosynthetically in
Scheme 1. Thus, we envisaged the formation of the product
from aldehyde 9 by means of a Wittig reaction followed by
hydrogenation/hydrogenolysis. The latter compound was ex-
pected from the stereoselective reduction of the enamine double
bond, reductive desulfonylation, and oxidation of the primary
alcohol of dehydropiperidine 10. Cyclization of γ-chloroamine
11, in turn obtained from L-alanine (13), with acetylenic sulfone
12 via conjugate addition, intramolecular alkylation, and desi-
lylation would afford the key intermediate 10.
Although relatively little studied, the alkaloid (+)-julifloridine
(4) has nevertheless been the subject of several synthetic
approaches. Thus, Paterne and Brown reported a racemic
synthesis in 1983,9 followed by enantioselective syntheses by
Naito et al.10 and more recently by Lemire and Charette.11 We
now report the first synthesis of (-)-(ent)-julifloridine (8), the
(5) Ahmad, V. U.; Qazi, S. Z. Naturforsch. B: Anorg. Chem., Org. Chem.
1983, 38B, 660.
(6) (a) Ott-Longoni, R.; Viswanathan, N.; Hesse, M. HelV. Chim. Acta
1980, 63, 2119-2129. (b) Da¨twyler, P.; Ott-Longoni, R.; Scho¨pp, E.; Hesse,
M. HelV. Chim. Acta 1981, 64, 1959-1963.
(7) (a) Nakano, H.; Nakajima, E.; Fujii, Y.; Shigemori, H.; Hasegawa,
K. Plant Growth Regul. 2004, 44, 207-210. (b) Nakano, H.; Nakajima,
E.; Hiradate, S.; Fujii, Y.; Yamada, K.; Shigemori, H.; Hasegawa, K.
Phytochemistry 2004, 65, 587-591.
(8) Snider, B. B.; Neubert, B. J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2715-2718.
(9) Paterne, M.; Brown, E. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Ser. 2 1983, 296, 433-
434.
(10) Kiguchi, T.; Shirakawa, M.; Honda, R.; Ninomiya, I.; Naito, T.
Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 15589-15606.
(11) Lemire, A.; Charette, A. B. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 2747-2750.
The required γ-chloroamine 11 was obtained from allylic
alcohol 14, which is readily available from (L)-alanine by the
method of Ibuka et al.12 This was followed by O-benzylation,
oxidative cleavage, reduction with lithium aluminum hydride,
and chlorination to afford 11, as shown in Scheme 2. Acetylenic
sulfone 12 was obtained as described previously.13
(12) Ibuka, T.; Habashita, H.; Otaka, A.; Fujii, N.; Oguchi, Y.; Uyehara,
T.; Yamamoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 4370-4382.
(13) Back, T. G.; Nava-Salgado, V. O.; Payne, J. E. J. Org. Chem. 2001,
66, 4361-4368.
3854 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 10, 2007

Synthesis of (-)-(ent)-Julifloridine
SCHEME 3
SCHEME 4
The cyclization of acetylenic sulfones with chloroamines or
amino esters by tandem conjugate addition and either intramo-
lecular alkylation or acylation, respectively, has provided routes
to a variety of alkaloids, including (-)-pumiliotoxin C,14
indolizidines (-)-167B, (-)-209D, (-)-209B, and (-)-207A,15
(-)-lasubine II,16 (()-myrtine,16 and quinolone alkaloids from
the medicinal shrub Ruta chalepensis.17 In the present instance,
the cyclization of 11 with 12 was readily effected by performing
the conjugate addition in methanol, followed by brief treatment
with 2 equiv of LDA at -78 °C in THF (Scheme 3).18 The
structure of enamine 10, obtained by desilylation of 19, was
confirmed by X-ray crystallography (see Supporting Informa-
tion) in order to ensure that epimerization had not occurred in
preceding steps.
Attempts to reduce the enamine double bond of silyl ether
19 with either sodium triacetoxyborohydride or sodium cy-
anoborohydride in the presence of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)
proceeded in high yield, but with a 2,6-trans to 2,6-cis ratio of
only ca. 10:1. We therefore investigated the similar reduction
of the free alcohol 10 to see if the stereoselectivity could be
improved. Indeed, treatment of 10 with sodium cyanoborohy-
dride in the presence of TFA afforded 84% of 20 as a single,
easily separated diastereomer, as well as 4% of an unseparable
1:1 mixture of diastereomers 21 and 22. The 2,6-trans config-
uration of the major product was confirmed by its ultimate
conversion to (-)-julifloridine (8) (Vide infra). Thus, this
procedure afforded the 2,6-trans isomers 20 and 21, differing
with respect to their configuration at the sulfone-substituted
carbon, in a combined yield of 86% with a 2,6-trans:cis ratio
of 43:1. The similar reduction of 10 with sodium triacetoxy-
borohydride afforded a comparable yield of the combined
diastereomers, but with the lower 2,6-trans to 2,6-cis ratio of
19:1. Reductive desulfonylation of the major isomer 20 with
sodium amalgam19 produced 23. As expected, the similar
reduction of the unseparated mixture of 21 and 22 furnished
equal amounts of 23 and another diastereomer, which we
conclude is the corresponding 2,6-cis isomer 24. These processes
are shown in Scheme 4.20
A remarkable protocol for the conversion of the enamine silyl
ether 19 to piperidinol 23 in two steps was discovered
fortuitously during the routine NMR analysis of the free alcohol
10. It was observed that 10 was transformed into the R,â-
unsaturated aldehyde 25 in high yield when allowed to stand
in CDCl3 solution for several hours, presumably as the result
of catalysis by traces of HCl present in the solvent. We postulate
that the presence of an acid catalyst results in equilibration of
the enamine 10 with its enol tautomer via the corresponding
iminium ion. Further tautomerization to the keto form, followed
by the facile elimination of p-toluenesulfinic acid, affords the
conjugated aldehyde 25 (Scheme 5).
Since the cleavage of TBDMS ethers can be carried out in
the presence of strong acids,21 we treated 19 in chloroform-
methanol containing concentrated hydrochloric acid. Desilylation
to 10, followed by tautomerization and elimination of the sulfinic
acid, as shown in Scheme 5, afforded the aldehyde 25 directly.
Moreover, the reduction of 25 with sodium cyanoborohydride
in the presence of hydrochloric acid produced the 2,6-trans-
piperidinol 23 as essentially a single diastereomer (d.r. >98:2),
(14) Back, T. G.; Nakajima, K. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6566-6571.
(15) Back, T. G.; Nakajima, K. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 4543-4552.
(16) Back, T. G.; Hamilton, M. D.; Lim, V. J. J.; Parvez, M. J. Org.
Chem. 2005, 70, 967-972.
(20) The stereoselectivity of hydride reductions or other nucleophilic
additions to cyclic iminium ions, which can be generated from the
corresponding enamines in the presence of acid catalysts, has been
extensively studied and can often be rationalized by consideration of steric
and stereoelectronic effects. For a review, see (a) Stevens, R. V. Acc. Chem.
Res. 1984, 17, 289-296. The role of A(1,2) strain is particularly important
in determining the stereoselectivity of reduction of iminium species derived
from N,2-substituted piperidines; see (b) Toyooka, N.; Yoshida, Y.; Yotsui,
Y.; Momose, T. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4914-4919. Similar arguments
presumably apply here.
(17) Back, T. G.; Parvez, M.; Wulff, J. E. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 2223-
2233.
(18) The reaction was quenched with neutral alumina after only 4 min
at -78 °C. Significant reductions in yield were observed with longer reaction
times or when the mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature prior
to workup.
(19) (a) For a review of desulfonylation methods, see: Na´jera, C.; Yus,
M. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 10547-10658. (b) Trost, B. M.; Arndt, H. C.;
Strege, P. E.; Verhoeven, T. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 3477-3478.
(21) Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. in ProtectiVe Groups in Organic
Synthesis, 3rd ed.; Wiley: New York, 1999; pp 133-141.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 10, 2007 3855

Zhai et al.
SCHEME 5
nately, the N-benzyl group proved resistant to hydrogenolysis
under these conditions and was therefore removed with sodium
in liquid ammonia. The product 8 was obtained in a high state
of purity, as evidenced by its NMR spectra (see the Supporting
Information) and a comparison of its optical rotation with that
of the known (+)-enantiomer23 (see the Experimental Section).
In summary, the (-)-antipode 8 of naturally occurring (+)-
julifloridine (4) was obtained for the first time from 11 and 12
in eight steps and an overall yield of 19%, via a sulfone-
mediated cyclization, using readily available and easily handled
reagents. The discovery of the acid-catalyzed conversion of the
piperidinol silyl ether 19 to the desulfonylated aldehyde 25 in
one step is noteworthy, as is the very high diastereoselectivity
in the subsequent reduction of 25 to 23. It is also evident that
the enantiomer of γ-chloroamine 11 would be equally accessible
from readily available D-alanine, thereby permitting the synthesis
of (+)-julifloridine by the same route. Finally, this approach
should serve for the synthesis of either enantiomer of the many
other 2,6-trans-disubstituted 3-piperidinols that have been
reported to date from various sources.
SCHEME 6
Experimental Section
General Experimental. Unless otherwise noted, NMR spectra
were recorded in CDCl3 solution and mass spectra were obtained
by electron impact. Chromatography refers to flash chromatography
on silica gel (230-400 mesh). Organic solutions were dried using
anhydrous MgSO4.
Enamine Sulfone 18. γ-Chloroamine 11 (2.38 g, 7.83 mmol;
see Supporting Information) was added to a solution of acetylenic
sulfone 1213 (2.80 g, 8.63 mmol) in 50 mL of dry methanol. The
solution was stirred at room temperature for 20 h and then
concentrated in Vacuo to give a yellow oil. The residue was
chromatographed using 20% ethyl acetate-hexane to give 3.87 g
(79%) of enamine 18, obtained as fine white crystals: mp 106-
SCHEME 7
107.5 °C (from ethyl acetate-hexanes); [R]22 ) +149 (c 0.34,
D
1
CHCl3); IR (KBr) 1557, 1284, 1255, 1130, 1086 cm-1; H NMR
(300 MHz) δ 7.46-7.31 (m, 7 H), 7.22-7.17 (m, 3 H), 7.11-
7.03 (m, 4 H), 5.37 (d, J ) 13.3 Hz, 1 H), 4.85 (s, 1 H), 4.68 (d,
J ) 11.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.61-4.50 (m, 1 H), 4.47 (d, J ) 12.8 Hz, 1
H), 4.40 (d, J ) 11.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.32 (d, J ) 16.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.93
(d, J ) 16.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.85-3.76 (m, 1 H), 3.58-3.50 (m, 2 H),
2.36 (s, 3 H), 1.24 (d, J ) 7.2 Hz, 3 H), 0.85 (s, 9 H), 0.07 (s, 3
H), 0.03 (s, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 158.1, 142.9, 141.7, 137.0,
136.2, 129.0, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 126.8, 126.1, 125.9, 99.3,
79.1, 72.1, 55.8, 55.1, 47.4, 43.1, 25.6, 21.3, 17.9, 15.4, -5.6, -5.7);
MS (m/z, %) 627 (M+, 5), 458 (63), 149 (65), 91 (100); HRMS
calcd for C26H3735ClNO2Si (M+ - CH2Ts): 458.2282. Found:
458.2304. Anal. Calcd for C34H46ClNO4SSi: C, 64.99; H, 7.38;
N, 2.23. Found: C, 65.06; H, 7.30; N, 2.06.
(5S,6S)-N-Benzyl-5-benzyloxy-2-(tert-butyldimethylsilyloxym-
ethyl)-6-methyl-3-(p-toluenesulfonyl)-2,3-dehydropiperidine (19).
Sulfone 18 (3.14 g, 5.00 mmol) was dissolved in 20 mL of dry
THF and cooled to -78 °C under argon. A solution of LDA (10.0
mmol) in 30 mL of dry THF was added via syringe over 5 min.
The resulting orange solution was stirred at -78 °C for 4 min and
was then filtered through neutral alumina. The alumina was washed
with THF and the clear filtrate was concentrated in Vacuo.
Compound 19 was obtained as a colorless oil (2.69 g, 91%) that
as indicated in Scheme 6.20 Thus, desilylation, enamine reduc-
tion, and desulfonylation were achieved in two steps with
excellent diastereoselectivity and in high yield under the above
conditions. Moreover, this procedure avoids the use of sodium
amalgam and the required manipulation and disposal of mercury.
Unfortunately, selective reduction of the carbon-carbon double
bond in the presence of the aldehyde was not possible.
The completion of the synthesis of (-)-julifloridine (8) is
shown in Scheme 7. The alcohol 23 was oxidized to aldehyde
9, followed by installation of the side chain by means of the
Wittig reagent 26.22 The resulting alkene 27 (E:Z ) 1:9) was
hydrogenated and O-debenzylated simultaneously. Unfortu-
was used in subsequent steps without further purification: [R]22
D
(23) Our specific rotation for (-)-8 was [R]22D ) -8.2 (c 0.34, MeOH).
This was in close agreement to that reported by Lemire and Charette (ref.
11) for (+)-julifloridine (4), [R]20 ) +7.3 (c 0.23, MeOH), but different
D
from that reported by Naito et al. (ref 10), [R]25D ) +18 (c 0.84, MeOH).
It should be noted that Lemire and Charette prepared the Mosher ester
derivative of their synthetic (+)-julifloridine and were thus able to confirm
that their synthetic product had an ee of 98.6% by 19F NMR analysis.
(22) Lermer, L.; Neeland, E. G.; Ounsworth, J. P.; Sims, R. J.; Tischler,
S. A.; Weiler, L. Can. J. Chem. 1992, 70, 1427-1444.
3856 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 10, 2007

Synthesis of (-)-(ent)-Julifloridine
) +128 (c 0.90, CHCl3); IR (film) 1568, 1296, 1141 cm-1; H
NMR (300 MHz) δ 7.80 (d, J ) 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.38-7.21 (m, 8
H), 7.20-7.09 (m, 4 H), 5.45 (d, J ) 12.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.99 (d, J )
16.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.59 (d, J ) 12.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.39 (d, J ) 11.8 Hz,
1 H), 4.34 (d, J ) 11.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.22 (d, J ) 16.4 Hz, 1 H),
3.58-3.48 (m, 1 H), 3.38-3.27 (m, 1 H), 2.86 (dd, J ) 15.9, 6.2
Hz, 1 H), 2.43 (s, 3 H), 2.16 (dd, J ) 16.2, 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 0.92 (d,
J ) 6.6 Hz, 3 H), 0.92 (s, 9 H), 0.14 (s, 3 H), 0.13 (s, 3 H); 13C
NMR (75 MHz) δ 150.7, 142.5, 141.1, 138.1, 138.0, 129.5, 128.9,
128.5, 127.8, 127.69, 127.67, 127.2, 126.6, 99.6, 72.6, 70.7, 56.3,
53.6, 53.0, 27.0, 26.0, 21.6, 18.3, 11.2, -5.1, -5.3; MS (m/z, %)
591 (M+, 2), 534 (7), 149 (81), 91 (100); HRMS calcd for C30H36-
NO4SSi (M+ - C4H9): 534.2134. Found: 534.2147.
4.51 (d, J ) 12.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.42 (d, J ) 12.0 Hz, 1 H), 3.88 (d, J
) 14.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.78 (d, J ) 14.2 Hz, 1 H), 3.61 (dd, J ) 11.0
Hz, 4.4 Hz, 1 H), 3.55-3.47 (m, 2 H), 3.23 (dq, J ) 3.4, 6.7 Hz,
1 H), 2.86-2.80 (m, 1 H), 2.21 (br, s, 1 H), 1.86-1.70 (m, 3 H),
1.59-1.43 (m, 1 H), 1.12 (d, J ) 6.8 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100
MHz) δ 140.2, 138.8, 128.5, 128.28, 128.26, 127.4, 127.3, 127.0,
76.3, 70.3, 61.7, 54.6, 52.8, 52.1, 24.2, 23.0, 8.6; MS (m/z, %) 294
(100), 234 (57), 91 (100); HRMS calcd for C20H24NO (M+ - CH2-
OH): 294.1858. Found: 294.1838.
1
The mixture of 21 and 22 was treated similarly to afford an
unseparated 1:1 mixture of two desulfonylated compounds. One
was identical to 23 (NMR), and the other was assumed to be 24 by
the process of elimination.
(5S,6S)-N-Benzyl-5-benzyloxy-2-hydroxymethyl-6-methyl-3-
(p-toluenesulfonyl)-2,3-dehydropiperidine (10). Compound 19
(632 mg, 1.07 mmol) was dissolved in 4 mL of THF, cooled to 0
°C, and treated with 1.0 M TBAF in THF (1.5 mL, 1.5 mmol).
The solution was stirred at room temperature for 2 h and washed
with brine, dried, and concentrated in Vacuo. The residue was
chromatographed using 35% ethyl acetate-hexane as eluent to give
464 mg (91%) of the free alcohol 10 as a white solid: mp 97-98
°C (from ethyl acetate-hexanes); [R]22D ) +177 (c 0.44, acetone);
IR (KBr) 3500, 1597, 1289, 1118 cm-1; 1H NMR (acetone-d6, 300
MHz) δ 7.77 (d, J ) 8.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.45-7.10 (m, 12 H), 5.01 (d,
J ) 12.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.94 (d, J ) 16.4 Hz, 1 H), 4.44 (d, J ) 16.4
Hz, 1 H), 4.52-4.34 (m, 3 H), 4.06 (br s, 1 H), 3.62-3.46 (m, 2
H), 2.75 (dd, J ) 16.2, 6.2 Hz, 1 H), 2.41 (s, 3 H), 2.22 (dd, J )
16.2, 10.6 Hz, 1 H), 0.91 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (75
MHz) δ 152.8, 143.4, 142.8, 139.4, 130.4, 129.6, 129.2, 128.5,
128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 127.2, 101.3, 73.5, 71.2, 56.8, 54.5, 53.4, 27.8,
21.5, 11.4; ESI MS 478 (M + H)+, 500 (M + Na)+. Anal. Calcd
for C28H31NO4S: C, 70.41; H, 6.54; N, 2.93. Found: C, 70.71; H,
6.12; N, 2.73. The X-ray crystallographic data for structure 10 is
provided in the Supporting Information.
(5S,6S)-N-Benzyl-5-benzyloxy-6-methyl-2,3-dehydropiperidine-
2-carbaldehyde (25). Silyl ether 19 (591 mg, 1.00 mmol) was
dissolved in 8 mL of chloroform-methanol (5:2) and treated with
1.0 mL of concentrated HCl under argon. The solution was stirred
at room temperature for 1 d and washed with saturated aqueous
KHCO3 solution. The aqueous layer was extracted with chloroform,
the combined organic layers were dried and concentrated, and the
residue was purified by chromatography (18% ethyl acetate-
hexanes) to give 263 mg (82%) of aldehyde 25 as a pale yellow
oil: [R]22D ) -70.2 (c 1.20, CHCl3); IR (film) 2733, 1685, 1458,
1361, 1092 cm-1; 1H NMR (300 MHz) δ 9.24 (s, 1 H), 7.41-7.20
(m, 10 H), 5.69 (dd, J ) 5.1, 3.1 Hz, 1 H), 4.49 (d, J ) 12.3 Hz,
1 H), 4.41 (d, J ) 11.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.40 (d, J ) 14.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.31
(d, J ) 14.9 Hz, 1 H), 3.46 (ddd, J ) 10.3, 5.9, 4.3 Hz, 1 H),
3.33-3.23 (m, 1 H), 2.53 (dt, J ) 5.8, 12.6 Hz, 1 H), 2.27 (m, 1
H), 0.89 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (75 MHz) δ 190.3, 143.5,
139.2, 138.2, 128.33, 128.30, 128.26, 127.6, 127.5, 127.1, 125.4,
71.4, 70.5, 54.2, 52.4, 27.0, 11.0; MS (m/z, %) 321 (M+, 28), 230
(28), 215 (30), 186 (26), 110 (70), 91 (100); HRMS calcd for
C21H23NO2: 321.1729. Found: 321.1715.
Stereoselective Reduction of Aldehyde 25. Concentrated HCl
(1.0 mL) was added dropwise to a suspension of aldehyde 25 (263
mg, 0.82 mmol) and sodium cyanoborohydride (601 mg, 9.54
mmol) in 15 mL of dichloromethane at -10 °C, and the mixture
was stirred at 0 °C for 10 h, then at room temperature for 2 h. The
mixture was washed with 10 mL of aqueous 20% KOH solution,
dried, and concentrated in Vacuo to provide a light yellow oil, which
was purified by chromatography (elution with 55% ethyl acetate-
hexanes) to afford 200 mg (75%) of 23 as a colorless oil. The
product was identical to that prepared by the desulfonylation of 20
(Vide supra) and contained at least 98% of the indicated diastere-
omer (NMR analysis).
12-[(2R,5S,6S)-N-Benzyl-5-benzyloxy-6-methylpiperidin-2-yl]-
dodec-11-en-1-ol (27). To a solution of oxalyl chloride (114 mg,
0.898 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (4 mL) at -78 °C was added
a solution of DMSO (140 mg, 1.79 mmol) in dichloromethane (2
mL). After 10 min, a solution of alcohol 23 (202 mg, 0.621 mmol)
in dichloromethane (2 mL) was added. The mixture was allowed
to stir for 45 min at -65 °C, triethylamine (182 mg, 1.80 mmol)
was added, and it was warmed to room temperature. After 1 h, the
reaction was quenched with 10% aqueous NaHCO3 solution and
extracted with dichloromethane. The organic layers were combined,
dried, and evaporated in Vacuo to afford 200 mg (100%) of aldehyde
9 as a yellow oil, which was used immediately without further
purification.
(2S,5S,6S)-N-Benzyl-5-benzyloxy-2-hydroxymethyl-6-methyl-
3-(p-toluenesulfonyl)piperidine (20). Trifluoroacetic acid (0.80
mL, 10 mmol) was added dropwise to a suspension of alcohol 10
(464 mg, 0.973 mmol) and sodium cyanoborohydride (668 mg, 10.6
mmol) in 15 mL of dichloromethane at 0 °C, and the mixture was
stirred at 0 °C for 1 h and then at room temperature for another 1
h. It was washed with aqueous KOH solution, dried, and concen-
trated in Vacuo to provide a light yellow oil, which was purified
by chromatography (45% ethyl acetate-hexanes) to afford 20 mg
(4%) of an inseparable 1:1 mixture of the less polar byproducts 21
and 22 as a clear oil (Vide infra). Further elution with 55% ethyl
acetate-hexanes afforded 391 mg (84%) of 2,6-trans-piperidine
20 as a colorless oil: [R]22 ) -62.1 (c 1.24, CHCl3); IR (film)
D
3411, 1597, 1316, 1145 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz) δ 7.75 (d, J )
8.1 Hz, 2 H), 7.39-7.31 (m, 5 H), 7.30-7.16 (m, 5 H), 7.04-7.00
(m, 2 H), 4.53 (d, J ) 11.9 Hz, 1 H), 4.34 (d, J ) 11.9 Hz, 1 H),
4.17 (d, J ) 14.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.84-3.71 (m, 3 H), 3.58 (s, 1 H),
3.43 (d, J ) 14.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.18-3.07 (m, 2 H), 2.98-2.79 (br, s,
1 H), 2.49 (s, 3 H), 2.40 (d, J ) 13.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.02 (dt, J ) 2.5,
13.7 Hz, 1 H), 1.32 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100 MHz) δ
144.8, 139.5, 138.0, 134.9, 130.0, 128.7, 128.38, 128.36, 128.2,
127.6, 127.3, 127.1, 76.0, 71.5, 55.5, 54.5, 53.6, 51.8, 50.2, 23.6,
-
21.6, 16.2; MS (m/z, %) 448 (M+ CH2OH, 76), 187 (30), 91
(100); HRMS calcd for C27H30NO3S (M+ - CH2OH): 448.1946.
Found: 448.1982.
Ylide 2622 (1.23 mmol) in 8 mL of THF was cooled to -78 °C
and aldehyde 9 (200 mg, 0.618 mmol) in THF (5 mL) was added.
The mixture was stirred at -78 °C for 2 h and then for an additional
2 h at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with water
(10 mL), and the solution was extracted with dichloromethane. The
combined organic layers were dried and concentrated, and the
residue was purified by chromatography (elution with 30% ethyl
acetate-hexanes) to give 204 mg (69% from 23) of olefin 27 (cis:
trans ) 9:1) as colorless oil: IR (film) 3363, 1453, 1372, 1075
cm-1; 1H NMR (300 MHz) major cis isomer: δ 7.37-7.14 (m, 10
H), 7.66-7.50 (m, 1 H), 5.43 (dt, J ) 10.8, 7.2 Hz, 1 H), 5.23
(2S,3S,6R)-N-Benzyl-3-benzyloxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)-2-meth-
ylpiperidine (23). Sulfone 20 (314 mg, 0.655 mmol) was suspended
in 15 mL of dry THF, and finely ground 5% sodium amalgam (4.44
g, 9.65 mmol of Na) was added. The mixture was refluxed under
nitrogen for 22 h and filtered through a Celite pad, followed by
washing with THF. The filtrate was concentrated in Vacuo to
provide a yellow oil, which was purified by chromatography (elution
with 55% ethyl acetate-hexanes) to afford 179 mg (84%) of 23 as
a colorless oil: [R]22 ) -16.0 (c 0.21, CHCl3); IR (film) 3424,
D
1
1091, 1071 cm-1; H NMR (400 MHz) δ 7.38-7.18 (m, 10 H),
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 72, No. 10, 2007 3857

Zhai et al.
(crude t, J ) ca. 10 Hz, 1 H), 4.41 (d, J ) 11.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.36 (d,
J ) 11.8 Hz, 1 H), 4.00 (d, J ) 13.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.65 (t, J ) 6.7 Hz,
2 H), 3.56-3.43 (m, 1 H), 3.38 (d, J ) 14.3 Hz, 1 H), 3.28-3.15
(m, 1 H), 2.16-2.02 (m, 2 H), 1.86-1.70 (m, 1 H), 1.69-1.48
(m, 3 H), 1.47-1.16 (m, 16 H), 0.99 (d, J ) 6.7 Hz, 3 H); minor
trans isomer: δ 0.96 (d, J ) 7.2 Hz); 13C NMR (75 MHz, major
cis isomer) δ 140.5, 138.8, 133.6, 131.3, 128.3, 128.2, 128.1, 127.5,
127.3, 126.5, 77.6, 69.9, 63.1, 53.8, 51.02, 50.96, 32.8, 31.6, 29.6,
29.53, 29.48, 29.43, 29.38, 29.24, 27.7, 25.7, 24.7, 3.0; MS (m/z,
%) 477 (M+, 4), 134 (69), 91 (100); HRMS calcd for C32H47NO2:
477.3607. Found: 477.3579.
(-)-(ent)-Julifloridine (8). To a stirred solution of olefin 27 (112
mg, 0.234 mmol) in 14 mL of ethyl acetate was added palladium
hydroxide (50 mg, 20% on C), and the resulting suspension was
stirred under a hydrogen atmosphere at 45 °C and 400 psi for 10
h. The mixture was filtered through Celite, and the filtrate was
evaporated to give a colorless oil (92 mg), which was used directly
in the next step.
The above oil was dissolved in 5 mL of THF and 15 mL of
liquid ammonia at -78 °C. Freshly cut sodium (368 mg, 16.0
mmol) was added while stirring, to afford a dark purple solution.
Stirring was continued for 30 min at -78 °C and then under reflux
(ca.-30 °C) for 3 h. Solid ammonium chloride was added until the
color disappeared, and the mixture was warmed to room temper-
ature. Stirring was continued until the evaporation of ammonia was
complete, and then 10 mL of water was added. The product was
isolated by the procedure of Lemire and Charette11 to afford 43.3
mg (62%) of (-)-(ent)-julifloridine (8) as a white solid: mp: 81-
83.5 °C, lit.4 82-83 °C, lit.10 85-87.5 °C, lit.11 82-83 °C; [R]22
D
) -8.2 (c 0.34, MeOH), lit.10 for (+)-julifloridine 4: [R]25
)
D
+18 (c 0.84, MeOH), lit.11 for (4): [R]20D ) +7.3 (c 0.23, MeOH);
IR (film) 3384, 3271, 1456, 1364, 1096 cm-1; 1H NMR (400 MHz)
δ 3.70-3.65 (m, 1 H), 3.64 (t, J ) 6.7 Hz, 2 H), 3.13 (dq, J ) 2.9,
6.5 Hz, 1 H), 2.82 (quintet, J ) 5.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.20-1.90 (br, s, 3
H), 1.94-1.84 (m, 1 H), 1.76-1.60 (m, 2 H), 1.58-1.44 (m, 3 H),
1.40-1.20 (m, 20 H), 1.11 (d, J ) 6.6 Hz, 3 H); 13C NMR (100
MHz; CH, CH2, CH3 signals assigned by DEPT) δ 68.8 (CH), 63.1
(CH2), 50.4 (CH), 49.6 (CH), 32.8 (2 × CH2), 29.7 (CH2), 29.6
(CH2), 29.5 (5 × CH2), 29.4 (CH2), 27.5 (CH2), 26.6 (CH2), 25.7
(CH2), 15.9 (CH3); MS (m/z, %) 300 (M+ + 1, 29), 114 (100);
HRMS calcd for C18H37NO2: 299.2824. Found: 299.2847.
Acknowledgment. We thank the Natural Sciences and
Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and Merck
Frosst (Canada) Ltd. for financial support.
Supporting Information Available: The procedure for the
1
preparation of 11, H and 13C NMR spectra of new compounds,
and X-ray crystallographic data for 10. This material is available
free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.
JO0703101
3858 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 10, 2007