substituted sec-ethoxyalkynyl acetate to give R,â-unsaturated
esters in excellent yield under very mild conditions with high
catalytic turnover and virtually complete E-selectivity that
is superior not only to the Wittig reaction but also to the
HWE reaction from the standpoint of atom economy and
stereoselectivity.1,2
We first examined the reaction of 5 with 1.5 equiv of H2O
in the presence of 5 mol % of Hg(OTf)2 in acetonitrile at
room temperature (Scheme 2). The reaction was completed
Table 1. Hg(OTf)2-Catalyzed Hydration of 5
yield (%)a
Hg(OTf)2
H2O
time
entry
solvent
(mol %) (equiv) (min)
6
7
8
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
CH3CN
C6H5CH3
Et2O
5
5
5
5
5
10
1
1
1
1
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1,5
1.5
1.5
1
5
1b
-
1
1
30 62
1440 51 19
150 34 44
2
5
1
21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5
CH3NO2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
40 72
30 76
10 75
20 88
20 94
15 76
20 86
20 25c
20 84
7
3
5
4
6
8
8
-
3
3
-
-
-
-
1
-
-
-
-
-
Scheme 2
1
1d
0.1
0.1d
300 85 11
300 20c
-
1
a NMR yield using 1,1,1-trichloroethane as an internal standard. b Reac-
tion in the presence of n-Bu4NOTf (1 equiv). c More than 70% of 5 was
recovered. d Reaction by using TfOH as catalyst.
vinylmercury product 8 (entry 5). Although an increase of
catalyst loading to 10 mol % did not increase the yield of 6,
1 mol % of catalyst resulted in an 88% yield within 20 min
(entries 6 and 7). The best result was obtained with the
reaction using 1 mol % of Hg(OTf)2 and 1 equiv of H2O for
20 min at room temperature in dichloromethane, affording
6 in 94% yield along with 6% of acetoxy ester 7 (entry 8).
The reaction was sensitive to the quantity of H2O: more
than 5 equiv of H2O significantly decreased the yield of 6
(entry 9). Addition of a phase transfer catalyst such as n-Bu4-
NOTf did not improve either reaction rate or yield of 6 (entry
10). Reaction under anhydrous condition also provided 6 in
25% yield along with 71% of starting material after 20 min
(entry 11). The reaction was shown to be also possible by
using TfOH, which gave rise to 6 in 84% yield with com-
plete E-selectivity along with 3% of 7 (entry 12);8 however,
the efficiency of Hg(OTf)2 over TfOH was evident when
the reaction was carried out by using 0.1 mol % of catalyst.
Hg(OTf)2 afforded 6 in 85% yield after 5 h (entry 13) along
with 11% of 7, whereas 0.1 mol % of TfOH gave 6 in 20%
yield along with 76% of starting material after 5 h (entry
14).9
within 30 min, and an R,â-unsaturated ester 6 was obtained
in 63% yield (NMR yield 62% by using 1,1,1-trichloroethane
as an internal standard)6b after column chromatography on
silica gel along with acetoxy ester 7 (2%), dimeric vinyl-
mercuric product 8 (5%), and Ritter-type byproduct 9 (21%)7
(Table 1, entry 1). The geometry of the double bond of 6
was probed to be E, and no trace of Z-isomer was detected.
While the generation of 9 was prevented by carrying out
the reaction in toluene, the reaction was very slow, giving
rise to 6 in 51% yield after 24 h (entry 2). The best solvent
was shown to be dichloromethane, which afforded 6 in 76%
yield along with 3% of 7 and negligible amounts of
(3) (a) Meyer, K. H.; Schuster, K. Chem. Ber. 1922, 55, 819-821. (b)
Rupe, H.; Kambli, E. HelV. Chim. Acta 1926, 9, 672. (c) Swaminathan, S.;
Narayanan, K. V. Chem. ReV. 1971, 71, 429-438. (d) Chabardes, P.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 6253-6256. (e) Narasaka, K.; Kusama, H.;
Hayashi, Y. Chem. Lett. 1991, 1413-1416. (f) Narasaka, K.; Kusama, H.;
Hayashi, Y. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 2059-2068. (g) Mercier, C.; Chabardes,
P. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994, 66, 1509-1518. (h) Suzuki, T.; Tokunaga, M.;
Wakatsuki, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 7531-7533. (i) Cadierno, V.;
Diez, J.; Garcia-Garrido, S. E.; Gimeno, J. Chem. Commun. 2004, 2716-
2717. (j) Yu, M.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, L. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 2147-2150.
(4) Imagawa, H.; Asai, Y.; Takano, H.; Hamagaki, H.; Nishizawa, M.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 447-450.
The proposed mechanism of this Hg(OTf)2-catalyzed
hydration is as shown in Scheme 3. The reaction is initiated
(5) (a) Nishizawa, M.; Skwarczynski, M.; Imagawa, H.; Sugihara, T.
Chem. Lett. 2002, 12-13. (b) Nishizawa, M.; Yadav, V. K.; Skwarczynski,
M.; Takao, H.; Imagawa, H.; Sugihara, T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1609-1611.
(c) Nishizawa, M.; Takao, H.; Yadav, V. K.; Imagawa, H.; Sugihara, T.
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4563-4565. (d) Imagawa, H.; Kurisaki, T.; Nishizawa,
M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3679-3681. (e) Imagawa, H.; Iyenaga, T.; Nishizawa,
M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 451-453. (f) Imagawa, H.; Iyenaga, T.; Nishizawa,
M. Synlett 2005, 703-705. (g) Imagawa, H.; Kinoshita, A.; Fukuyama, T.;
Yamamoto, H.; Nishizawa, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 4729-4731.
(h) Yamamoto, H.; Nishiyama, M.; Imagawa, H.; Nishizawa, M. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 2006, 47, 8369-8373. (i) Kurisaki, T.; Naniwa, T.; Yamamoto,
H.; Imagawa, H.; Nishizawa, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1871-1874.
(j) Yamamoto, H.; Sasaki, I.; Imagawa, H.; Nishizawa, M. Org. Lett. 2007,
9, 1399-1402. (k) Yamamoto, H.; Pandey, G.; Asai, Y.; Nakano, M.;
Kinoshita, A.; Namba, K.; Imagawa, H.; Nishizawa, M. Org. Lett. 2007, 9,
4029-4032.
(8) Li, Z.; Zhang, J.; Brouwer, C.; Yang, C. G.; Reich, N. W.; He, C.
Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4175-4178.
(9) Typical procedure: To a solution of 5 (100 mg, 0.45 mmol) in
dichloromethane (4.5 mL) were sequentially added H2O (8.0 µL, 0.45 mmol)
and Hg(OTf)2 (0.1 M solution in acetonitrile, 45 µL, 0.0045 mmol) at room
temperature, and the mixture was stirred for 20 min at the same temperature.
After addition of NaHCO3 solution, organic material was extracted with
dichloromethane. Dried and concentrated extract was purified by flash
column chromatography on silica gel using hexane-ethyl acetate (15:1) as
an eluent to give 6 (74.7 mg, 92%, NMR yield 94%) as a colorless oil:
FTIR (neat) 2928, 2853, 1725, 1650, 1448, 1368, 1274, 1173, 1046, 983
cm-1; 1H NMR (200 MHz, CDCl3) δ 6.92 (dd, J ) 15.4, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.76
(dd, J ) 15.4, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 4.18 (q, J ) 7.2 Hz, 1H), 2.13 (m, 1H), 1.60-
1.85 (m, 6H), 1.29 (t, J ) 7.2 Hz, 1H), 1.01-1.45 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (50
MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.1, 154.2, 118.9, 60.1, 40.4, 31.7, 25.9, 25.7, 14.2;
(6) (a) Engel, D. A.; Dudley, G. B. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 4027-4029. (b)
Lopez, S. S.; Engel, D. A.; Dudley, G. B. Synlett 2007, 949-953.
(7) Ritter, J. J.; Kalish, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 4045-4048.
+
HRMS m/z calcd for C11H19O2 [M + H]+ 183.1386, found 183.1384.
5578
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 26, 2007