A R T I C L E S
Woithe et al.
At the outset of our work, the preferred substrate of OxyB
was unknown, although attempts to detect turnover using the
free heptapeptides 17 (derived from 2, Figure 2) had proven
unsuccessful.9 In more recent gene knock-out experiments, a
bpsC mutant of the balhimycin producer A. balhimycina (i.e., a
mutated condensing domain in module-7 of NRPS subunit-3
(BpsC)) was found to produce the monocyclic hexapeptide 18,5
showing that the first cross-link could be introduced in ViVo at
the hexapeptide stage. Hence, attention turned to assays with
hexa- and heptapeptides loaded as thioesters on PCP domains
from the NRPS. For reasons of their easier synthesis, however,
we chose to focus first on peptide analogues containing tyrosine
at positions-2 and -6, i.e., hexapeptide-PCP conjugates 3 and
4, and heptapeptide-PCP conjugates 13 and 14.
The free linear peptides required for this work comprised the
model hexapeptides 9 and 10, and heptapeptides 11 and 12
(Figures 3 and 4) that could each be assayed as the correspond-
ing peptide-PCP thioesters 3, 4, 13, and 14. The N-terminus
of 3 and 9 contains (R)-N-methylleucine. N-Methylation actually
occurs at a later stage in glycopeptide biosynthesis, after peptide
assembly and cross-linking.23 Our first experiments were
performed with these N-methylated peptides, since it was
expected that a secondary amine might be more stable in the
presence of the C-terminal thioester group,24 yet the peptides
might nevertheless be acceptable substrates for OxyB. These
assumptions were shown to be valid in the course of this work.
Subsequently, a method for the preparation of the non-N-
methylated peptides (4 and 14) was established, employing a
temporary Boc-N-protecting group (peptides 10 and 12), which
could be removed with TFA after activation of the C-terminus
as a S-phenyl thioester (Figure 5). Conversion into the PCP-
derivatives was then achieved using the SCoA derivatives
and the phosphopantetheinyl transferase Sfp from Bacillus
subtilis.15,24
Interestingly, the CD spectrum of the apo-PCP-7S showed
minima at 208 and 222 nm, with a shape suggesting that the
protein was folded with significant helical content, consistent
with the expected four-helix bundle fold (Figure S8, Supporting
Information).26 The CD spectrum of apo-PCP-6S, however,
showed a much more intense minimum at 202 nm, suggesting
either that a significant proportion of the protein may be
unfolded, or that the global fold includes a much larger
proportion of disordered regions.27,28 Certainly, the CD signa-
tures suggest a significant difference between the structures of
apo-PCP-6S and apo-PCP-7S, which is of interest here in the
light of binding studies with the peptide-loaded PCPs and OxyB
(see later).
Bacterial class-I P450s typically require the presence of a
ferredoxin-like [Fe-S]-protein and a flavin-containing ferre-
doxin reductase for substrate turnover, which receive reducing
equivalents from NADPH. The class-II P450s, on the other hand,
usually receive electrons from NADPH through a flavin-
containing reductase.29-31 Within the published glycopeptide
biosynthetic gene clusters no ferredoxin or ferredoxin reductase
has been identified,3,32-36 with the exception of a single
ferredoxin in the complestatin cluster.32 So the natural redox
partners for the biosynthetic cross-linking enzymes are mostly
unknown. In assays with the peptide 9 loaded on PCP-7S (3),
the sp-ferredoxin/eco-FlvR pair was used as electron-transfer
proteins.
The conversion of hexapeptide-PCP-6S (3) into monocyclic
product (5), isolated as the peptide hydrazide 7, was reported
earlier.10 We could show here for the first time that the same
hexapeptide loaded on PCP-7S is converted at a significantly
faster rate into the monocyclic product 5. This observation is
interesting, on the one hand, because in UV-vis binding assays
we could also show that the interaction of hexapeptide-PCP-
6S (3) with OxyB is substantially weaker than that of hexapep-
tide-PCP-7S (3) with OxyB (Figure 7). The binding data
suggest a dissociation constant of hexapeptide-PCP-7S (3) with
OxyB of about 17 µM. On the other hand, we have also seen
that PCP-6S and PCP-7S have different CD signatures (Figure
S8), with that of PCP-7S resembling the spectrum expected of
a four-helix bundle PCP or acyl carrier protein (ACP),26 and
that of PCP-6S resembling more closely those of ACP domains
The PCP domains used here were derived from the vanco-
mycin NRPS modules-6 and -7. So far no structural information
is available on the vancomycin NRPS. Nevertheless, the 3D
structure of a typical NRPS PCP domain, e.g., TycC3 from the
tyrocidine NRPS (PDB files 2GDW/2GDX/2GDY), comprises
a compact four-helix bundle,25 with the phosphopantetheinylated
active site Ser residue located in a loop connecting helix-1 and
helix-2. The minimal four-helix bundle includes about 32
residues on the N-terminal side and 38 residues on the
C-terminal side of the active site Ser (denoted here 32-Ser-38).
We, therefore, first attempted to produce recombinant N-terminal
His6-tagged apo-PCP domains encompassing residues 30-Ser-
40, as well as 37-Ser-40, from module-6 of the vancomycin
NRPS (Figure 2). However, both were insoluble when produced
in the cytoplasm of E. coli. On the other hand, a 30-Ser-52
construct (PCP-6S) could be produced in a soluble form and
was easily purified as described earlier.10 In addition, the PCP
domain from NRPS module-7 (37-Ser-39, called PCP-7S) could
be produced in the same way as a soluble N-terminal His6-
tagged fusion protein.
(26) Mofid, M. R.; Finking, R.; Marahiel, M. A. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277,
17023-17031.
(27) Flaman, A. S.; Chen, J. M.; Van Iderstine, S. C.; Byers, D. M. J. Biol.
Chem. 2001, 276, 35934-35939.
(28) Schulz, H. J. Biol. Chem. 1975, 250, 2299-2304.
(29) Ortiz de Montellano, P. R. Cytochrome P450. Structure, mechanism, and
Biochemistry, 3rd ed.; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York,
2005.
(30) Pylypenko, O.; Schlichting, I. Annu. ReV. Biochem. 2004, 73, 991-1018.
(31) Paine, M. J. I.; Scrutton, N. S.; Munro, A. W.; Gutierrez, A.; Roberts, G.
C. K.; Wolf, C. R. Electron transfer partners of cytochrome P450. In
Cytoschrome P450 Structure, Mechanism, and Biochemistry; de Montellano,
P. R. O., Ed.; Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York, 2005; pp
115-148.
(32) Chiu, H. T.; Hubbard, B. K.; Shah, A. N.; Eide, J.; Fredenburg, R. A.;
Walsh, C. T.; Khosla, C. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2001, 98, 8548-
8553.
(33) Li, T. L.; Huang, F. L.; Haydock, S. F.; Mironenko, T.; Leadlay, P. F.;
Spencer, J. B. Chem. Biol. 2004, 11, 107-119.
(23) O’Brien, D. P.; Kirkpatrick, P. N.; O’Brien, S. W.; Staroske, T.; Richardson,
T. I.; Evans, D. A.; Hopkinson, A.; Spencer, J. B.; Williams, D. H. Chem.
Commun. 2000, 103-104.
(34) Pootoolal, J.; Thomas, M. G.; Marshall, C. G.; Neu, J. M.; Hubbard, B.
K.; Walsh, C. T.; Wright, G. D. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99,
8962-8967.
(24) Vitali, F.; Zerbe, K.; Robinson, J. A. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2718-
2719.
(35) Sosio, M.; Kloosterman, H.; Bianchi, A.; deVreugd, P.; Dijkhuizen, L.;
Donadio, S. Microbiol. 2004, 150, 95-102.
(36) Sosio, M.; Stinchi, S.; Beltrametti, F.; Lazzarini, A.; Donadio, S. Chem.
Biol. 2003, 10, 541-549.
(25) Koglin, A.; Mofid, M. R.; Lohr, F.; Schafer, B.; Rogov, V. V.; Blum, M.-
M.; Mittag, T.; Marahiel, M. A.; Bernhard, F.; Dotsch, V. Science 2006,
312, 273-276.
9
6892 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 21, 2007