Epoxonium Ion Cyclization Reactions
A R T I C L E S
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Diepoxide Cyclization Substrates 5-8a
n
a Reagents and conditions: (a) 2,2,6,6-Tetramethylpiperidine, BuLi, Et2AlCl, benzene, 0 °C, 92%. (b) (EtO)3CCH3, propionic acid, 145 °C, 94%. (c)
DIBAL-H, CH2Cl2, -78 °C, 92%. (d) Ph2CH2, nBuLi, THF, 0 °C, 80% (n ) 1), 80% (n ) 2). (e) NaH, DMF, 0 °C, then MeI. (f) Bu4NF, THF, 97% (n )
1), 98% (n ) 2), two steps. (g) Ph3P+CH2OMeCl-, NaHMDS, THF, -78 °C, then Hg(OAc)2, THF, H2O, KI, 91%. (h) Shi catalyst, KHSO5, (MeO)2CH2,
CH3CN, H2O, 0 °C, 88% (5), 91% (6), 64% (7). (i) Boc2O, N-methylimidazole, PhMe, 0 °C, 93% (5), 86% (6), 78% (7), 82% (8, two steps). (j) (+)-
t
Diisopropyl tartrate, BuOOH, Ti(OiPr)4, CH2Cl2, -25 °C, 96% (n ) 1), 97% (n ) 2).
Scheme 4. Convergent Synthesis of Epoxide 9a
n
a Reagents and conditions: (a) DIBAL-H, CH2Cl2, -78 °C. (b) Ph2CH2, BuLi, THF, 0 °C, 82% (two steps). (c) 1-Phenyl-1H-tetrazole-5-thiol, Ph3P,
DIAD, THF, 97%. (d) NaH, DMF, 0 °C, then MeI, 85%. (e) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 95%. (f) KHMDS, DME, -78 °C, then 15, 63%. (g) Bu4NF,
THF, 95%. (h) Shi catalyst, KHSO5, (MeO)2CH2, CH3CN, H2O, -5 °C, 94%. (i) Boc2O, N-methylimidazole, PhMe, 83%.
ated aldehydes 10 and 11 by identical pathways that proceeded
through aldehydes 12 and 13. Alkenylation, reduction, epoxi-
dation, and carbonate formation13 provided the desired sub-
strates. The syntheses of trisubstituted epoxides 3 and 4
commenced by opening epoxide 1414 under Yamamoto’s
conditions15 and forming aldehyde 15 through a Claisen
rearrangement/reduction sequence. This aldehyde was either
taken directly to 3 or was homologated through methoxymeth-
ylenation and mercury-mediated enol ether hydrolysis.16 The
resulting homologated aldehyde was converted to 4 in an
identical manner to the conversion of 15 to 3.
The synthesis of diepoxide substrates 5-8 (Scheme 3)
parallels the synthesis of 3 and 4, with the exception that
asymmetric epoxidation reactions were employed to ensure high
diastereocontrol. Known epoxide 1617 was converted to aldehyde
17, which could either be transformed to 5 and 6 or homologated
and converted to 7 and 8. Substrates 5 and 7, with (2R, 3R, 6R,
7R) stereochemical orientations, were formed from a double
Shi epoxidation of dienes 18 and 19,18 while substrates 6 and
8, with (2S, 3S, 6R, 7R) stereochemical orientations, were
prepared through sequential Sharpless19 and Shi epoxidations.
Substrate 9 was prepared (Scheme 4) through a convergent
sequence that employed a Julia-Kocienski olefination20 between
sulfone 20 (five steps from valerolactone) and aldehyde 15. The
resulting alkene was converted to the desired product through
the sequence that was used for the preparation of 5 and 7.
Cyclization Reactions. The results of the oxidative cycliza-
tion reactions of monoepoxides 1-4 are shown in Table 1.
Essential components in these photochemical reactions (medium-
pressure mercury lamp, Pyrex filtration) were N-methylquino-
linium hexafluorophosphate (NMQPF6) as a catalytic oxidant,21
O2 (from air) as the terminal oxidant,22 and toluene as a
cosensitizer. Disubstituted epoxide 1 provided exo-product 21
as a mixture of anomers, as expected based on analogy to
previous studies.9 Cyclization of the homologated substrate 2
yielded a mixture of exo-product 22 and endo-product 23, with
the exo-pathway being slightly favored. The formation of 23
was quite interesting, since the difference between the reactions
of 1 and 2 is simply that the initial cyclization of 1 forms a
bicyclo[3.1.0] epoxonium ion and the cyclization of 2 proceeds
through a bicyclo[4.1.0] epoxonium ion. Endo-cyclizations into
bicyclo[4.1.0] epoxonium ions have also been observed by
McDonald and co-workers23 from Lewis acid mediated pro-
cesses in which epoxonium ions are formed by adding to
nonstabilized carbenium ions and are opened by epoxide
nucleophiles. Trisubstituted epoxide 3 also produced a complex
product mixture upon oxidation, with both exo- and endo-
cyclization products being formed. The stabilizing effect of the
methyl group on the cationic intermediate modestly impacted
the regioselectivity of the cyclization reaction but was insuf-
ficient to override the preference for the exo-pathway. Also of
note, the endo-cyclizations proceeded from both inversion and
retention of the epoxonium ion to form a mixture of trans- and
(13) Basel, Y.; Hassner, A. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 6368.
(14) Maruoka, K.; Murase, N.; Bureau, R.; Ooi, T.; Yamamoto, H. Tetrahedron
1994, 50, 3663.
(15) Yasuda, A.; Tanaka, S.; Oshima, K.; Yamamoto, H.; Nozaki, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 6513.
(16) Ansell, M. F.; Caton, M. P. L.; Stuttle, K. A. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans 1 1984, 1069.
(17) Hamilton, J. G. C.; Hooper, A. M.; Ibbotson, H. C.; Kurosawa, S.; Mori,
K.; Muto, S.; Pickett, J. A. Chem. Commun. 1999, 2335.
(18) Wang, Z.-X.; Tu, Y.; Frohn, M.; Zhang, J.-R.; Shi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 11224.
(19) Gao, Y.; Klunder, J. M.; Hanson, R. M.; Masamune, H.; Ko, S. Y.;
Sharpless, K. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 5765.
(20) Blakemore, P. R.; Cole, W. J.; Kocienski, P. J.; Morley, A. Synlett 1998,
26.
(21) Kumar, V. S.; Floreancig, P. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2842.
(22) Kumar, V. S.; Aubele, D. L.; Floreancig, P. E. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4123.
(23) Valentine, J. C.; McDonald, F. E.; Neiwert, W. A.; Hardcastle, K. I. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4586.
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 25, 2007 7917