In this work, we were motivated by the hypothesis that
bent anthradithiophenes (BADTs), structurally analogous to
dibenz[a,h]anthracene, a structural isomer of pentacene, may
also be of interest for organic electronics applications.
BADTs are virtually unexplored8 and there is no reported
route to the parent unsubstituted compound. Swager and co-
workers have developed aryl-functionalized derivatives using
a chemical cyclization strategy; however, this is limited in
scope.9
parent BADT is planar and shows a small extent of cofacial
overlap between adjacent molecules (Figure 2). An inter-
Here we report a new route to luminescent BADTs using
an oxidative photocyclization-based synthetic strategy. This
route also enables access to dialkyl-functionalized BADTs,
with the alkyl groups modifying both the solubility and
structural organization of the rigid BADT framework.
The synthetic route to 1,4-di(2-thienyl)-2,5-divinylbenzene
4a and its alkylated derivatives 4b-d is outlined in Scheme
1. Compounds 3a-d were prepared via a Pd(0)-catalyzed
Figure 2. (a) Thermal ellipsoid plot of 5a. (b) View down the
short molecular axis of 5a; the stacking axis is vertical. (c) View
down the long molecular axis of 5a; the stacking axis is vertical.
(d) View down the stacking axis of two cofacial molecules of 5a.
Scheme 1
planar distance of 3.46 Å indicates the presence of π-π
interactions along the intermolecular stacking axis. For
comparison, dibenz[a,h]anthracene crystallizes into a her-
ringbone arrangement (P21 or Pcab) with no intermolecular
cofacial interactions.10 Thus, the incorporation of thienyl
groups appears to enhance π-stacking in the crystal lattice.
The XRD pattern of a thin film of 5a prepared by vacuum
evaporation (Figure 3a) exhibits two strong reflections
corresponding to the (1,0,-1) and (2,0,-2) planes assigned
from the diffraction pattern calculated from the single-crystal
XRD data. The thin film is highly crystalline, with reflections
indicating that the molecules in the thin film are oriented
with their long molecular axes nearly perpendicular to the
substrate surface, a phenomenon seen in oligothiophenes as
well as in LADTs.3,11
Single crystals of 5d were grown from cold chloroform
and the structure was determined by XRD (Figure 4a).
Functionalizing the thienyl R-positions with dodecyl chains
imparts a larger degree of cofacial slipping along both the
short and long molecular axes (Figure 4b). The interplanar
stacking distance of 3.49 Å is indicative of π-π interactions
along the stacking axis.
In the solid state, the molecules are organized into a
lamellar packing arrangement with the rigid central motif
separated by dodecyl chains (Figure 4c). The XRD pattern
of a thin film of 5d prepared by vacuum evaporation exhibits
six strong reflections that correspond to the (0,0,1) through
(0,0,6) planes. The molecules are oriented with the long
molecular axes inclined approximately 45° with respect to
Stille cross-coupling reaction between 2 and the appropriate
2-(tributylstannyl)thiophene. Wittig olefination of the di-
aldehyde species with methyltriphenylphosphonium bromide
offered compounds 4a-d in good yield. The BADTs 5a-d
were prepared by irradiating dilute benzene solutions of
4a-d with UV light. Unlike the parent LADT and its
alkylated derivatives, compounds 5a-d are formed as single
isomers and are readily soluble in common organic solvents
at room temperature, thus enabling purification by column
chromatography.
Crystals of 5a suitable for single-crystal X-ray diffraction
(XRD) studies were grown from cold dichloromethane. The
(6) (a) Payne, M. M.; Odom, S. A.; Parkin, S. R.; Anthony, J. E. Org.
Lett. 2004, 6, 3325. (b) Payne, M. M.; Parkin, S. R.; Anthony, J. E.; Kuo,
C.-C.; Jackson, T. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4986.
(7) Dickey, K. C.; Anthony, J. E.; Loo, Y.-L. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18,
1721.
(8) A different isomer than described here has been prepared; see: Shen,
H.-C.; Tang, J.-M.; Chang, H.-K.; Yang, C.-W.; Liu, R.-S. J. Org. Chem.
2005, 70, 10113.
(10) (a) Iball, J.; Morgan, C. H.; Zacharias, D. E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 2 1975, 1271. (b) Iball, J. Nature 1936, 137, 361. (c) Krishnan, K.
S.; Banerjee, S. Z. Kristallogr. 1935, 91, 173. (d) Robertson, J. M.; White,
J. G. J. Chem. Soc. 1947, 1001. (e) Robertson, J. M.; White, J. G. J. Chem.
Soc. 1956, 925.
(11) (a) Lovinger, A. J.; Davis, D. D.; Ruel, R.; Torsi, L.; Dodabalapur,
A.; Katz, H. E. J. Mater. Res. 1995, 10, 2958. (b) Servet, B.; Horowitz, G.;
Ries, S.; Lagorsse, O.; Alnot, P.; Yassar, A.; Deloffre, F.; Srivastava, P.;
Hajlaoui, R.; Lang, P.; Garnier, F. Chem. Mater. 1994, 6, 1809.
(9) (a) Tovar, J. D.; Swager, T. M. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 653,
215. (b) Goldfinger, M. B.; Crawford, K. B.; Swager, T. M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 4578.
3572
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 18, 2007