6894
J. Li et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 6891–6894
10. Ogata, H.; Hibi, T. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2003, 14, 1107.
11. Moller, D. R. J. Intern. Med. 2003, 253, 31.
12. Sack, M. Pharmacol. Ther. 2002, 94, 123.
13. Barnes, P. J. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2002, 42, 81.
14. Handraskar, B.; Mitchell, D. H. Hepatograstroenteroogy
1998, 45, 1807.
15. Rosler, N.; Wichart, I.; Jollinger, K. A. Acta Neurol.
Scand. 2001, 103, 126.
16. Jahromi, M. M.; Millward, B. A.; Demaine, A. G. J.
Interferon Cytokine Res. 2000, 20, 885.
activities than the compounds having alkyl moiety at 12-
C (e.g., 9a, 9b, 9c) in both TNF-a and IL-6 expression,
suggesting that the electron-withdrawing group at 12-C
might be good for potent activity of 12-hydroxy-14-
dehydroandrographolide. However, the underlying
mechanisms by which andrographolide and its deriva-
tives inhibited LPS-induced TNF-a and IL-6 expression
remain unknown and are the focus of our current
research.
17. Lin, H. Q.; Ling, K.; Guo, J. S.; Zheng, T. W.; Bao, X. G.
Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2006, 29, 220.
18. Sheeja, K.; Kuttan, G. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2006, 5, 244.
19. Sheeja, K.; Guruvayoorappan, C.; Kuttan, G. Int. Immu-
nopharmacol. 2007, 7, 211.
20. Han, G.; Liu, L.; Xu, Q. T.; Du, G. J.; Xie, S. Q. Chinese
Patent CN1785177A, 2006.
21. Srinivas, N.; Sriram, R.; Venkateswarlu, A. U.S. Patent
US6576662B2, 2003.
In conclusion, a series of andrographolide derivatives
have been synthesized and their inhibitory effects on
LPS-induced TNF-a and IL-6 expression in mouse mac-
rophages have been evaluated. The data analysis indi-
cated no clear SAR for these compounds, but the
compounds with the structure of 12-hydroxyl-14-dehy-
droandrographolide showed better inhibitory activity
than the compounds having the structure of isoandrog-
rapholide, suggesting the structure of 12-hydroxy-14-
dehydroandrographolide might be a good generation
for further optimization.
22. Analytical data for 3e: mp: 185–186 °C; IR (KBr, cmÀ1):
3554, 3105, 2938, 1755, 1708, 1470, 1295, 1124; 1H
NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz) d: 7.97 (d, 2H, Ph), 7.65–7.45
(t, 3H, Ph), 7.27 (s, 1H, 14-H), 4.83 (s, 2H, 15-H), 4.70–
4.66 (m, 3H, 12-H, 3-H, 19-H), 4.44 (d, 1H, 19-H), 3.40
(br, 1H, 3-OH), 1.29 (s, 3H, 17-CH3), 1.13 (s, 3H, 18-
CH3), 1.04 (s, 3H, 20-CH3); EIMS: 477.2 [M+Na]+.
Analytical data for 9e: mp: 119–122 °C; IR (KBr, cmÀ1):
3409, 3111, 2950, 2873, 1729, 1625, 1545, 1344, 1279, 897;
1H NMR(CDCl3, 300 MHz) d: 9.25–9.14 (m, 4H, Ph),
7.50 (s, 1H, 14-H), 6.00 (t, 1H, J = 6.3 Hz, 12-H), 4.98 (s,
1H, 17-H), 4.91 (s, 2H, 15-H), 4.86 (s, 1H, 17-H), 4.18 (t,
1H, J = 7.2 Hz, 3-H), 3.43 (t, 1H, J = 9.9 Hz, 19-H), 3.30
(t, 1H, J = 9.9 Hz, 19-H), 1.23 (s, 3H, 18-CH3), 0.68 (s,
3H, 20-CH3); EIMS: 500.2 [M+H]+. Analytical data for
9f: mp: 176–178 °C; IR (KBr, cmÀ1): 3472, 2938, 2866,
1744, 1700, 1636, 1445, 1200, 1037, 828; 1H NMR(CDCl3,
300 MHz) d: 7.85 (d, 2H, J = 7.2 Hz, Ph), 7.41 (m, 3H, Ph,
14-H), 5.92 (t, 1H, J = 5.7 Hz, 12-H), 4.93 (s, 1H, 17-H),
4.84 (s, 3H, 15-H, 17-H), 4.18 (d, 1H, J = 11.4 Hz, 3-H),
3.49 (t, 1H, J = 7.5 Hz, 19-H), 3.31 (d, 1H, J = 10.8 Hz,
19-H), 2.38 (s, 3H, Ph–CH3), 1.23 (s, 3H, 18-CH3), 0.65 (s,
3H, 20-CH3); EIMS: 491.2 [M+Na]+.
References and notes
1. Gorter, K. Recl. Trav. Chim. 1911, 30, 151.
2. Zhao, S. X.. In Big Dictionary of Traditional Chinese
Medicine; Jiangsu Press: Nanjing, 1992; Vol. 2, pp 1580.
3. Gupta, S.; Choudhry, M. A.; Yadava, J. N. S.; Srivastava,
V.; Tandon, J. S. Int. J. Crude Drug Res. 1990, 28, 273.
4. Deng, W. L. Drugs Future 1990, 15, 809.
5. Misra, P.; Pal, N. L.; Guru, P. Y.; Katiyar, J. C.; Srivastava,
V.; Tandon, J. S. Int. J. Pharmacogn. 1992, 30, 263.
6. Najib, N. A. R. N.; Furuta, T.; Kojima, S.; Takane, K.;
Ali, M. M. J. Ethnopharmocol. 1999, 64, 249.
7. Puri, A.; Saxena, A.; Saxena, R. P.; Saxena, K. C.;
Srivastava, V.; Tandon, J. S. . J. Nat. Prod. 1993, 56, 995.
8. Choudhury, B. R.; Haque, S. J.; Poddar, M. K. Planta
Med. 1987, 53, 135.
9. Zhao, H. Y.; Fang, W. Y. Chin. Med. J. 1991, 104, 770.