Y.-H. Yan et al.
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 41 (2021) 127956
Scheme 3. Synthesis of compounds 9a–9j.ǂ ǂReaction conditions: (a) Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 KOAc, 1,4-dioxane, B2Pin2, 90 ◦C, 8 h; (b) (i) 1) NaIO4, THF/H2O, rt, 20 min; (ii)
HCl (aq.), 2 h; (c) THF, 8a–8c, 60 ◦C, 24 h.
Biochemical evaluation and SAR analyses
(i.e., compound 9a) at C-3 position, we observed a significant increase in
inhibitory activity (Table 1), particularly for KPC-2 (IC50 = 0.18 µM),
TEM-1 (IC50 = 0.73 µM), and NDM-1 (IC50 = 8.44 µM). Correspondingly,
9b (with methylaminophenyl) and 9c (with piperidinylphenyl) showed
comparable inhibitory activity to OXA-48, VIM-1 and Sfh-I, but slightly
lower activity to KPC-2, TEM-1, AmpC and NDM-1. These results sug-
gested that dimethylaminophenyl is a preferred fragment to extensively
accommodate with the active sites of all the tested enzymes. Thus,
several analogs (9d, 9f, 9g, 9h, 9i, and 9j) with C-3 dimethylamino-
phenyl were further synthesized and evaluated. Compared with 9a, 9d
with fluorine at C-4 position showed reduced activity against all the
tested enzymes except for Sfh-I, which is similar as that of the pair 7a/7h
(Table 1), suggesting that the fluorine substituent at C-4 position is not
favorable for the inhibition to the tested β-lactamases (except for Sfh-I).
Compound 9f with the chlorine substituent at C-5 position showed
better or comparable inhibitory potency compared with 9a. Especially,
9f had an IC50 value of 86 nM to the clinically important KPC-2.
Compared to 9a, 9g (a fluorine substituent at C-5) and 9h (a methoxy
substituent at C-5) exhibited slightly decreased inhibitory activity
against tested enzymes, with an exception of KPC-2. Compared with the
moderate inhibition of 9a and 9b on VIM-1, the weak inhibition of 9d–9j
on VIM-1 indicated that the substitution on the phenyl group of the
benzoxaborol core is unfavorable for binding with VIM-1. The intro-
duction of a chlorine atom at C-6 position (i.e., compound 9i) was
harmful for the inhibition of tested class A SBLs and B1 MBL but bene-
ficial to inhibit class C SBL and B2 MBL. As a marketed beta-lactamase
inhibitor, avibactam exhibited nanomolar to submicromolar inhibition
potency against tested SBLs and B2 Sfh-I, but showed weak inhibitory
activity against tested B1 MBLs. Compared to avibactam, the benzox-
aborole compounds had less potent inhibition to tested SBLs. Never-
theless, some compounds showed good inhibition towards both tested
SBLs and MBLs, e.g. 3b and 9f, indicating their potentiation for further
optimization as broad-spectrum MBL/SBL inhibitors.
To investigate the inhibitory activity of the synthesized 3-substituted
benzoxaborole derivatives to β-lactamases, we selected a panel of
representative MBLs and SBLs, including serine enzymes class A KPC-2
and penicillinase TEM-1, class C AmpC, class D Oxacillinase-48 (OXA-
48), and metalloenzymes class B1 New Delhi MBL-1 (NDM-1), B1 Ver-
ona integron-encoded MBL-1 (VIM-1) and class B2 Serratia fonticola
MBL (Sfh-I). The protein production/purification are well-documented
in our previous work20,23–25; all enzyme inhibition assays were carried
out using the reported fluorescent substrate FC-5.26 All the results are
summarized in Tables 1 and 2.
Compound 3a with phenyl substituent at C-3 position showed broad-
spectrum inhibition to all the tested β-lactamases at micromolar level.
(Table 1). Compound 3b, possessing a thiophene group substituent at C-
3 position, exhibited comparable or slightly better inhibitory potency
against SBLs and MBLs compared with 3a (Table 1).
Compounds 7a–7i, which bear 5-indole substituents at C-3 position,
were then evaluated against these SBLs and MBLs. Compound 7a dis-
played potent inhibition against KPC-2, AmpC, NDM-1, VIM-1 and Sfh-I
with IC50 values of low micromolar level, while it had much lower in-
hibition to TEM-1 and OXA-48. Similar tendency were observed for
compounds 7b–7e (with fluoro-, chloro-, or methyl group at the indole
substituent, please see Table 1); notably, 7b, 7c, and 7e manifested IC50
of 0.36 µM, 0.20 µM, and 0.22 µM to KPC-2, respectively. Comound 7b
showed less potent inhibition than 7b, 7c and 7e towards tested SBLs,
probably indicated the size and electronegativity of the substituent may
influent interaction with residues in the active site. Compounds 7f and
7g, with a large benzyl group at of 3-indole, had low inhibition against
tested SBL enzymes, probably due to its steric hindrance with the active
sites of these enzymes. Interestingly, 7g had substantial inhibitory ac-
tivity on the tested MBLs but 7f did not. This may be due to the steric
clash between the C-5 substitution on the indole ring of 7f and the
residues on the L10 loop of the MBL active site, while N-1 substituted
indole ring of 7g may enhance the interactions with the L3 loop. For
compounds 7h and 7i, which had fluorine at C-4 and C-6 position
respectively, we observed that 7h showed stronger inhibitory activity
than 7i against KPC-2, AmpC and tested MBLs.
In order to investigate how 9f binds with KPC-2 and NDM-1, we
carried out docking simulations to predict the possible binding mode of
9f with KPC-2 and NDM-1. Since the flexibility of Trp105 at L3 loop of
KPC-2 was observed in our previous crystallographic analyses,20 we
selected the two crystal structures (PDB codes 6J8Q and 6JN3) as the
docking templates. The best predicted binding mode is shown in Fig. 2A.
By replacement of the aromatic ring with the dimethylaminophenyl
3