Z. Nie et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 4191–4195
Table 4. Cell activity of selected pyrazolo-triazines
4195
X
X
X
O
a
N
b
NH
N
CN
N
H
N
N
N
NH
NH2
S
N
H
HN
O
N
N
SH
HO
N
N
O
X = CN, Me, Et, Br
HN
N
N
H
10
11
X
X
R
16
N
N
c
d
N
N
N
N
16
R
hCK2
HCT116
PC3
S
N
S
Cl
N
HO
Ki (nM) IC50 (lM) IC50 (lM)
a
b
c
d
e
4-N-Methylpiperazine 0.21
1.06
2.5
2.2
NI
39
1.4
12
13
O
3-NMe2
4-NEt2
3-COOH
0.55
0.5
ND
ND
ND
ND
X
X
NH
N
N
0.095
e,f
g
N
N
N
N
3-CONH(CH2)2NMe2 0.19
S
N
H
N
N
HN
HN
R
O
R
N
3
f
0.70
1.4
0.78
14
15
O
g
h
i
3-CONEt2
3-OEt
3-OCHF2
0.37
0.19
0.19
0.76
1.48
2.1
0.61
1.2
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions: (a) (CO2Et)NCS, EtOAc, reflux;
(b) NH4OH, MeOH; (c) BnBr, i-Pr2NEt, NMP; (d) N,N-dimethylan-
iline, POCl3, reflux; (e) RNH2, NMP, rt; (f) mCPBA, CH2Cl2; (g) N-(3-
amino-phenyl)-acetamide, NMP, 160 °C.
1.7
NI, no inhibition; ND, not determined.
Structure activity relationships of compounds (15)
clearly indicated that a small cyclopropyl group at the
C4 position (15a) was at least as active as the phenyl
group (9a). However, small substitutions at the C8 posi-
tion, such as methyl (15d), ethyl (15e) or bromo (15f), re-
sulted in significant decreases in inhibitory potency,
probably because of their size and/or electronic proper-
ties (Table 3).
References and notes
1. Ahmad, K. A.; Wang, G.; Slaton, J.; Unger, G.; Ahmed, K.
Anti-Cancer Drugs 2005, 16, 1037.
2. Saha, S.; Bardelli, A.; Buckhaults, P.; Velculescu, V. E.; Rago,
C.; St Croix, B.; Romans, K. E.; Choti, M. A.; Lengauer, C.;
Kinzler, K. W.; Vogelstein, B. Science 2001, 294, 1343.
3. (a) Seldin, D. C.; Leder, P. Science 1995, 267, 894; (b)
Kelliher, M. A.; Seldin, D. C.; Leder, P. EMBO J. 1996, 15,
5160; (c) Landesman-Bollag, E.; Channavajhala, P. L.;
Cardiff, R. D.; Seldin, D. C. Oncogene 1998, 16, 2965; (d)
Channavajhala, P.; Seldin, D. C. Oncogene 2002, 21, 5280.
4. Mottet, D.; Ruys, S. P.; Demazy, C.; Raes, M.; Michiels, C.
Int. J. Cancer 2005, 117, 764.
5. Lebrin, F.; Chambaz, E. M.; Bianchini, L. Oncogene 2001,
20, 2010.
6. (a) Yamane, K.; Kinsella, T. J. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 4362;
(b) Di Maira, G.; Salvi, M.; Arrigoni, G.; Marin, O.; Sarno,
S.; Brustolon, F.; Pinna, L. A.; Ruzzene, M. Cell Death
Differ. 2005, 12, 668.
As shown in Table 3, in an MTT cell-based assay, com-
pound 9e showed sub-lM inhibition against the
HCT116 cancer cell line. Therefore, a series of com-
pounds 16 with a variety of substitutions on the C4-aro-
matic ring were synthesized (Table 4). All of the
compounds are very potent inhibitors of human CK2
with Ki < 1 nM (many of them are more potent than
9e). Compounds 16a, 16f, and 16g strongly inhibit cell
growth when tested against HCT116 and PC3 cancer
cell lines. It should be noted that, there is still a big dis-
crepancy between their enzymatic potency and cell
growth inhibition, probably due to their low aqueous
solubility and poor cell membrane permeability. Further
optimization of this series of compounds is ongoing to
address these problems.
7. Slaton, J. W.; Unger, G. M.; Sloper, D. T.; Davis, A. T.;
Ahmed, K. Mol. Cancer Res. 2004, 2, 712.
8. (a) Sarno, S.; Ruzzene, M.; Frascella, P.; Pagano, M. A.;
Meggio, F.; Zambon, A.; Mazzorana, M.; Di Maira, G.;
Lucchini, V.; Pinna, L. A. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2005, 276,
69; (b) Cozza, G.; Bonvini, P.; Zorzi, E.; Poletto, G.;
Pagano, M. A.; Sarno, S.; Donella-Deana, A.; Zagotto, G.;
Rosolen, A.; Pinna, L. A.; Meggio, F.; Moro, S. J. Med.
Chem. 2006, 49, 2363; (c) Battistutta, R.; Mazzorana, M.;
Sarno, S.; Kazimierczuk, Z.; Zanotti, G.; Pinna, L. A.
Chem. Biol. 2005, 12, 1211; (d) Sarno, S.; Salvi, M.;
Battistutta, R.; Zanotti, G.; Pinna, L. A. Biochim. Biophys.
Acta 2005, 1754, 263; (e) Zien, P.; Duncan, J. S.; Skierski,
J.; Bretner, M.; Litchfield, D. W.; Shugar, D. Biochim.
Biophys. Acta 2005, 1754, 271.
In summary, we have described the design and synthesis
of pyrazolo[1,5-a][1,3,5]triazines as novel CK2 inhibi-
tors. Using X-ray crystal structures of cCK2, protein
structure-based design enables us to identify the most
potent CK2 inhibitors with Ki < 1 nM. These com-
pounds also show strong inhibition against cancer cell
growth. Future work will be focused on the improve-
ment of their biophysical properties to yield drug-like
pre-clinical candidates for in-vivo animal studies.
9. Lubbers, T.; Angehrn, P.; Gmunder, H.; Herzig, S.;
Kulhanek, J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2000, 10, 821.