A R T I C L E S
Scheme 1
Fang and Bendiak
configuration of monosaccharides to be confidently assigned
when they are derived in the gas phase through successive
isolation/dissociation events from a larger oligosaccharide
molecule. If monosaccharides could be identified with certainty
based on some unique physical property in the gas phase, then
mass spectrometry could be employed with confidence on par
with NMR spectroscopy, at least for establishing the nature of
the stereochemistry of monomers derived from larger structures.
While the stereochemistry of individual monosaccharides can
be determined after hydrolysis/solvolysis through chromato-
graphic means (such as GC-MS),13,14 this does not permit the
order of individual monosaccharides having different stereo-
chemistries to be assigned within a larger molecule (i.e., which
specific monosaccharides are linked to which). The same
argument fundamentally applies to classical “permethylation
analysis”,15-17 where neither the anomeric configuration nor the
order of monosaccharides can be determined following hy-
drolysis or reductive cleavage of an oligosaccharide to its
monomeric constituents.
To establish such an order requires (1) a controlled disas-
sembly of a larger molecule in the gas phase yielding substruc-
tures from different regions of the molecule that are isolable
by MS methods and (2) a means to differentiate substructures
so that the stereochemistry of individual monosaccharides as
gas-phase species can be determined without ambiguity. As part
of the stereochemistry of a monosaccharide is inherent in the
asymmetry at its anomeric carbon, establishing the anomeric
configuration of each sugar is part and parcel of its structural
proof.
Fortunately, ion traps and Fourier transform ion cyclotron
resonance (FTICR) instruments enable multiple isolation/
dissociation steps to be performed18-21 so that issue 1, above,
can be reasonably effectively addressed. At some point,
however, differentiation of these substructures is required in a
way that can confidently establish the stereochemistry and
location of monosaccharides within a larger molecule. The best
ions to divulge this information have not been conspicuous as
yet.
We sought to determine whether disaccharides, the smallest
isolable substructures derived from oligosaccharides that still
contain a glycosidic linkage between two monosaccharides,
would dissociate to yield product ions from which detailed
stereochemical information might be obtained about either of
its monosaccharides in the gas phase. As disaccharides them-
selves represent a large number of isomeric molecules, dif-
ferentiating their structures in the gas phase has not been
generally possible. Studies in the positive22-25 and negative26-32
ion modes have primarily focused on determination of linkage
position in disaccharides; similar information about linkage sites
is possible with pyranosyl-1-enes derived from permethylated
oligosaccharides33,34 or from peracetylated disaccharides.35,36
Fewer studies have been carried out to address the identifica-
tion of anomeric configuration in disaccharides.31,37-40 In the
studies cited, emphasis was placed on mass spectral differentia-
tion between two disaccharides having identical sugars and
linkage positions, varying only in the anomeric configuration
of the nonreducing sugar. Identifying the stereochemistry of one
or the other sugars solely by dissociation of a disaccharide in
the gas phase, without knowing the monosaccharide composition
in adVance, is a rather more challenging endeavor. It not only
implies (1) that key product ions derived from disaccharides
must dissociate in a way unique to their stereochemistry but
also implies (2) that the origins of individual disaccharide
fragments derived by cleavage on either side of the glycosidic
linkage be known and (3) that product ions are not isobaric
mixtures themselves, containing fragments of sugars originating
from either side of the glycosidic linkage.
Bearing these issues in mind, we recently reported that the
m/z 221 anion derived from glucose-containing disaccharides
in the negative ion mode was in fact a glucosyl-glycolaldehyde
anion (Scheme 1) based on its comparison to synthetic R- and
â-glucopyranosyl- and R- and â-glucofuranosyl-glycolalde-
hydes.41 Both the anomeric configuration and ring forms of the
m/z 221anions could be clearly assigned by their MS dissociation
patterns. It was also demonstrated that the intact monosaccharide
(22) Zhou, Z.; Ogden, S.; Leary, J. A. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 5444-5446.
(23) Hofmeister, G. E.; Zhou, Z.; Leary, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113,
5964-5970.
(24) Dongre´, A. R.; Wysocki, V. H. Org. Mass Spectrom. 1994, 29, 700-702.
(25) Asam, M. R.; Glish, G. L. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1997, 8, 987-995.
(26) Ballistreri, A.; Montaudo, G.; Garozzo, D.; Giuffrida, M.; Impallomeni,
G. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 1989, 3, 302-304.
(27) Garozzo, D.; Giuffrida, M.; Impallomeni, G.; Ballistreri, A.; Montaudo,
G. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 279-286.
(28) Dallinga, J. W.; Heerma, W. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1991, 20, 215-231.
(29) Carroll, J. A.; Ngoka, L.; Beggs, C. G.; Lebrilla, C. B. Anal. Chem. 1993,
65, 1582-1587.
(30) Garozzo, D.; Impallomeni, G.; Spina, E.; Green, B. N.; Hutton, T.
Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 221, 253-257.
(31) Mulroney, B.; Traeger, J. C.; Stone, B. A. J. Mass Spectrom. 1995, 30,
1277-1283.
(32) Mulroney, B.; Peel, J. B.; Traeger, J. C. J. Mass Spectrom. 1999, 34, 856-
871.
(33) Ashline, D.; Singh, S.; Hanneman, A.; Reinhold, V. Anal. Chem. 2005,
77, 6250-6252.
(34) Zhang, H.; Singh, S.; Reinhold, V. N Anal. Chem. 2005, 77, 6363-6270.
(35) Domon, B.; Mu¨ller, D. R.; Richter, W. J. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion
Processes 1990, 100, 301-311.
(13) Seymour, F. Methods Carbohydr. Chem. 1993, 9, 59-85.
(14) Bendiak, B.; Fang, T. T. Carbohydr. Res. 2000, 327, 463-481.
(15) Lindberg, B.; Lo¨nngren, J. Methods Enzymol. 1978, 50, 3-33.
(16) Hakomori, S. J. Biochem. 1964, 55, 205-208.
(17) Gray, G. R. Methods Enzymol. 1990, 193, 573-586.
(18) Paul, W.; Reinhard, H. P.; von Zahn, U. Z. Phys. 1958, 152, 143-182.
(19) Hao, C.; March, R. E. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2001, 212, 337-357.
(20) Marshall, A. G. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2000, 200, 331-356.
(21) Blaum, K. Phys. Rep. 2006, 425, 1-78.
(36) Peltier, J. M.; MacLean, D. B.; Szarek, W. A. Rapid Commun. Mass
Spectrom. 1991, 5, 446-449.
(37) Smith, G.; Leary, J. A. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1996, 7, 953-957.
(38) Jiang, Y. J.; Cole, R. B. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 16, 60-70.
(39) Mendonca, S.; Cole, R. B.; Zhu, J.; Cai, Y.; French, A. D.; Johnson, G. P.;
Laine, R. A. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2005, 14, 63-78.
(40) Polfer, N. C.; Valle, J. J.; Moore, D. T.; Oomens, J.; Eyler, J. R.; Bendiak,
B. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 670-679.
(41) Fang, T. T.; Zirrolli, J.; Bendiak, B. Carbohydr. Res. 2007, 342, 217-235.
9
9722 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 31, 2007