C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 2
and often stabilized by electron donation of a M-L σ-bond into
the CO π* orbital,11 5 is a stable compound in spite of the apparent
high-valent character of the metal center and absence of Ta-alkyl
σfπ* backdonation (Calkyl-Ta-Ccarbonyl ) 84.9(2)°).11c Reaction
of 3 with PhSSPh at room temperature immediately gives the
cationic dithiolate alkyl complex 6. Liberation of the pendant arene
1
moiety from the metal center in 6 is seen from the shift of its H
NMR signals back into the aromatic region (δ 7.3-6.9 ppm). This
oxidative addition reaction shows that, despite the considerable
Ta(V)/dienediyl (B) character of 3, it can readily display reactivity
corresponding to a Ta(III) compound.
Thus, in cationic ansa-Cp-arene complexes of tantalum, the
coordination of the pendant arene allows resonance stabilization
of low-valent species, resulting in ambivalent character. It causes
considerable differences in chemistry relative to the isoelectronic
neutral tantalocene analogues. The cationic ansa-Cp-arene tantalum
complexes can display both migratory insertion and oxidative
addition reactions. Use of these intramolecular interactions thus
could provide a fruitful strategy to give early transition metals a
more “noble” character.
(o-ArH: δ 4.55/4.23; p-ArH: 2.22 ppm), consistent with formation
1
of an η6-adduct and partial disruption of the aromaticity. The H
NMR spectrum of 3 at -30 °C also shows features characteristic
for a â-agostic alkyl group. The R-CH2 protons are diastereotopic
(δ 0.61 and -0.54 ppm), and the â-CH2 resonances are broad and
shifted significantly upfield (δ -1.9 and -5.9 ppm). The â-agostic
Ta-nPr structure of 3 stands in marked contrast to the isoelectronic
neutral group 5 metal (ansa-)metallocene analogues, which have
olefin-hydride ground states.6a,7 Two-Dimensional EXSY NMR
spectroscopy at 70 °C (at which temperature the diastereotopic R-
and â-CH2 groups are coalesced) shows exchange between all
Acknowledgment. Financial support was provided by NRSC-
Catalysis.
Supporting Information Available: Text giving full experimental
and characterization data, and crystallographic data for compounds 2,
3, 4-THF, and 5. This material is available free of charge via the
1
propyl H resonances, suggesting the dynamics occur through a
thermally accessible olefin-hydride intermediate.7
References
The reaction of 3 with H2 in bromobenzene results in immediate
formation of the corresponding cationic hydride 4 (Scheme 2). As
is the case for 3, the NMR spectra of 4 indicate a C1 symmetric
structure (possibly indicating solvation by bromobenzene)8 and an
(1) (a) Van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M. Homogeneous Catalysis: Understanding
the Art; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherland, 2004;
pp 36-41. (b) De Meijere, A., Diederich, F., Eds. Metal-Catalyzed Cross-
Coupling Reactions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2004; pp 1-40.
(2) (a) Deckers, P. J. W.; Hessen, B.; Teuben, J. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 2516. (b) Deckers, P. J. W.; Hessen, B.; Teuben, J. H.
Organometallics 2002, 21, 5122.
1
η6-coordinated arene. The Ta-H H NMR resonance at δ -4.65
ppm corresponds to 1H intensity, revealing a contrast to neutral
metallocene analogues, which form trihydrides (Cp2MH3).9 Upon
addition of 1 bar of propene to a solution of 4, quantitative
regeneration of 3 is observed within 1 h. In agreement with this, 4
can catalyze the hydrogenation of 1-hexene at ambient temperature
(15 t.o. in 16 h). Although 4 is stable for at least 24 h in cold (-25
°C) bromobenzene solution, attempted isolation by removal of the
volatiles led to decomposition. Addition of THF to solutions of 4
gave the THF adduct 4-THF, which was isolated in crystalline form.
Its 1H NMR spectrum shows a singlet at -3.98 ppm, and in the IR
spectrum, a broad band at 1760 cm-1 is observed, both consistent
with the presence of a Ta-H moiety. An X-ray structure (Figure
1) confirmed the overall geometry of the complex.
Treatment of 3 with 1 bar of CO at room temperature results
in the formation of the CO adduct 5 (Scheme 2). The ν(CO) IR
band at 2033 cm-1 lies at considerably higher frequency than in
Cp2TaR(CO) (R ) H, alkyl; 1880-1895 cm-1).10 The reduced
ability of the metal center in 5 for π-backdonation to CO reflects
the acceptor properties of the η6-arene and is in agreement with
substantial Ta(V) character. The X-ray structure of 5 (Figure 1)
shows again that the arene moiety is slightly folded by 11.4(4)°.
The CO bond is only modestly elongated at 1.107(8) versus
1.148(7) Å in Cp2TaR(CO) (R ) CH2SiH(tBu)2).10b Whereas CO
adducts of d0 early transition metal centers are in general weak
(3) (a) Blok, A. N. J.; Budzelaar, P. H. M.; Gal, A. W. Organometallics 2003,
22, 2564. (b) De Bruin, T. J. M.; Magna, L.; Raybaud, P.; Toulhoat, H.
Organometallics 2003, 22, 3404. (c) Tobisch, S.; Ziegler, T. Organome-
tallics 2003, 22, 5392.
(4) (a) Bruck, M. A.; Copenhaver, A. S.; Wigley, D. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1987, 109, 6525. (b) Arney, D. J.; Wexler, P. A.; Wigley, D. E.
Organometallics 1990, 9, 1282.
(5) The presence of MeMgCl as the only NMR active component in the white
residue suggests that trans-alkylation is a key step in this transformation.
(6) (a) Chirik, P. J.; Zubris, D. L.; Ackerman, L. J.; Henling, L. M.; Day, M.
W.; Bercaw, J. E. Organometallics 2003, 22, 172. (b) Fryzuk, M. D.;
Johnson, S. A.; Rettig, S. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 1602. (c)
Abbenhuis, H. C. L.; Feiken, N.; Haarman, H. F.; Grove, D. M.; Horn,
E.; Kooijman, H.; Spek, A. L.; Van Koten, G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1991, 30, 996.
(7) (a) Burger, B. J.; Santarsiero, B. D.; Trimmer, M. S.; Bercaw, J. E. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 3134. (b) Green, M. L. H.; Sella, A.; Wong,
L. L. Organometallics 1992, 11, 2650. (c) Shin, J. H.; Parkin, G. Chem.
Commun. 1999, 887. (d) Ackerman, L. J.; Green, M. L. H.; Green, J. C.;
Bercaw, J. E. Organometallics 2003, 22, 188.
(8) (a) Wu, F.; Dash, A. K.; Jordan, R. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
15360. (b) Bouwkamp, M. W.; Budzelaar, P. H. M.; Gercama, J.; Del
Hierro Morales, I.; De Wolf, J.; Meetsma, A.; Troyanov, S. I.; Teuben, J.
H.; Hessen, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 14310.
(9) Antinolo, A.; Carrillo-Hermosilla, F.; Fajardo, M.; Fernandez-Baeza, J.;
Garcia-Yuste, S.; Otero, A. Coord. Chem. ReV. 1999, 193-195, 43.
(10) (a) Klazinga, A. H.; Teuben, J. H. J. Organomet. Chem. 1979, 165, 31.
(b) Berry, D.; Koloski, T.; Carroll, P. Organometallics 1990, 9, 2952.
(11) (a) Marsella, J.; Curtis, C.; Bercaw, J.; Caulton, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1980, 102, 7244. (b) Guo, Z.; Swenson, D.; Guram, A.; Jordan, R.
Organometallics 1994, 13, 766. (c) Burckhardt, U.; Tilley, T. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 6328.
JA073956J
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 33, 2007 10101