4-Aryl-2-quinolones through a Pseudo-Domino Heck/Buchwald–Hartwig Reaction
COMMUNICATIONS
commercially available and were used as purchased, without References
further purification. Reaction products were purified on ax-
ially compressed columns, packed with SiO2 25–40 mm (Ma-
cherey–Nagel), connected to a Jasco RI-031 Plus solvent de-
livery system and to a Jasco PU-2087 Plus refractive index
detector, and eluting with n-hexane/ethyl acetate mixtures.
1H NMR (400 MHz), 13C NMR (100.6 MHz) and 19F NMR
(376.5 MHz) spectra were recorded with a Bruker Avance
400 spectrometer. IR spectra were recorded with a Jasco
FT/IR-430 spectrometer. Mass spectra were recorded with a
Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010S.
[1] N. A. Cortese, C. B. Ziegler Jr., B. J. Hrnjez, R. F.
Heck, J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2952.
[2] A. Arcadi, E. Bernocchi, S. Cacchi, F. Marinelli, Tetra-
hedron 1991, 47, 1525.
[3] A. Arcadi, S. Cacchi, G. Fabrizi, F. Marinelli, P. Pace,
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 6983.
[4] S. Cacchi, P. G. Ciattini, E. Morera, P. Pace, Synlett
1996, 545.
[5] A. Arcadi, S. Cacchi, G. Fabrizi, F. Marinelli, P. Pace,
Synlett 1996, 568.
[6] G. Battistuzzi, S. Cacchi, I. De Salve, G. Fabrizi, L. M.
Synthesis of 3-(o-Bromophenyl)acrylamide (1)
Parisi, Adv. Synth. Catal. 2005, 347, 308.
To a stirred solution of acrylamide (74.5 mg, 1.05 mmol), 1-
bromo-2-iodobenzene (128 mL, 1 mmol) and Et3N (418 mL,
3 mmol) in CH3CN (1 mL), Hermann catalyst (9.36 mg,
0.01 mmol) was added. The reaction mixture was stirred for
12 h at 1008C. After cooling, the reaction mixture was dilut-
ed with ethyl acetate and washed with water. The organic
layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under re-
duced pressure. The residue was purified by chromatogra-
phy (silica gel, 35 g; 40/60 v/v n-hexane/ethyl acetate) to
give 1; yield: 180 mg; mp 171–1738C; IR (KBr): n=3340,
[7] For some reviews, see: a) J. F. Hartwig, Synlett 1997,
329; b) D. Baranano, G. Mann, J. F. Hartwig, Curr. Org.
Chem. 1997, 1, 287; c) J. F. Hartwig, Acc. Chem. Res.
1998, 31, 852; d) J. P. Wolfe, S. Wagaw, J.-F. Marcoux,
S. L. Buchwald, Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 805; e) J. F.
Hartwig, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 1998, 37, 2046; f) J. F.
Hartwig, Pure Appl. Chem. 1999, 71, 1417; g) B. H.
Yang, S. L. Buchwald, J. Organomet. Chem. 1999, 576,
125; h) D. Prim, J. M. Campagne, D. Joseph, B. Andrio-
letti, Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 2041; i) B. Shlummer, U.
Sholz Adv. Synth. Catal. 2004, 346, 1599.
3153, 1671 cmÀ1 1H NMR (DMSO-d6): d=7.70–7.63 (m,
;
4H), 7.44 (m, 1H), 7.32 (m, 1H), 7.24 (bs, 1H), 6.63 (d, J=
15.64 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d=166.6, 137.7,
135.0, 133.7, 131.6, 128.8, 128.2, 126.0, 124.7; MS: m/z (rela-
[8] A. S. Guram, R. A. Rennels, S. L. Buchwald, Angew.
Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1348.
[9] J. Louie, J. F. Hartwig, Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 3609.
[10] For a general review on domino processes, see: L. F.
Tietze, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115.
tive intensity)=226.90 (4.25%), 225.95
(0.78%), 224.90 (M+,
N
4.29%),146.10 (100.00%), 102.10 (34.45%), 44 (41.00%).
[11] J. J. Li, G. W. Gribble, Palladium in Heterocyclic
Typical Procedure for the Preparation of 4-Aryl-2-
quinolones (4)
Chemistry, Pergamon, New York, 2000.
[12] D. V. Kadnikov, R. C. Larock, J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
6772.
[13] M. Mori, K. Chiba, N. Ohta, Y. Ban, Heterocycles 1979,
13, 329.
To a mixture of 1 (0.113 g, 0.50 mmol), p-iodoanisole
(0.093 mL, 0.75 mmol), n-BuN4OAc (0.452 g, 1.5 mmol) and
n-BuN4Br
(0.483 g, 1.5 mmol),
Pd
A
(0.006 g,
[14] C. W. Holzapfel, C. Dwyer, Heterocycles 1998, 48, 215.
[15] G. A. Freeman, C. W. Andrews III, A. L. Hopkins,
G. S. Lowell, L. T. Schaller, J. R. Cowan, S. S. Gonzales,
G. W. Koszalka, R. J. Hazen, L. R. Boone, G. Rob,
R. G. Ferris, K. L. Creech, G. B. Roberts, S. A. Short,
K. Weaver, J. David, D. J. Reynolds, J. Milton, J. Ren,
D. I. Stuart, D. K. Stammers, J. H. Chan, J. Med. Chem.
2004, 47, 5923.
0.025 mmol) was added. The mixture was stirred for 48 h at
1208C. After cooling, the reaction mixture was diluted with
ethyl acetate and washed with water. The organic layer was
dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated under reduced pres-
sure. The residue was purified by chromatography (silica
gel, 35 g; 25/75 v/v n-hexane/ethyl acetate) to give 4a; yield:
0.092 g (73%); mp 196–1988C; IR (KBr): n=3131,
1
1672 cmÀ1; H NMR (DMSO-d6): d=11.82 (bs, 1H), 7.51 (t,
[16] M. Goulet, E. E. Allen, R. J. DeVita, J. Jiang, T. F.
Walsh, J. R. Young, M. J. Wyvratt, Jr., R. B. Toupence,
F. Ujjainwalla, World Patent WO 9744339, 1997; Chem.
Abstr. 1997, 128, 48236.
[17] J. J. Kulagowski, M. Rowley, P. D. Leeson, I. M. Mawer,
European Patent EP 481676, 1992; Chem. Abstr. 1992,
117, 131086.
J=8 Hz, 1H), 7.44–7.36 (m, 4H), 7.13–7.07 (m, 3H), 6.35 (s,
1H), 3.82 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (DMSO-d6): d=161.3, 159.6,
151.1, 139.3, 130.4, 130.1, 128.8, 126.2, 121.7, 120.9, 118.5,
115.8, 114.1, 55.2; MS: m/z (relative intensity)=251 (M+,
100%), 252 (40%), 236 (30%) 208 (50%).
[18] D. Dhanak, A. C. Kaura, A. Shaw, World Patent WO
2001085172, 2001; Chem. Abstr. 2001, 135, 371990.
[19] A. Afonso, J. Weinstein, M. J. Gentles, World Patent
WO 9204326, 1992; Chem. Abstr. 1992, 117, 26358.
[20] a) P. Norman, Curr. Opin. Invest. Drugs 2002, 3, 313;
b) M. Venet, D. End, P. Angibaud Curr. Top. Med.
Chem. 2003, 3, 1095; c) E. van Cutsem, H. van de
Velde, P. Karasek, H. Oettle, W. L. Vervenne, A. Szaw-
lowski, P. Schoffski, S. Post, C. Verslype, H. Neumann,
H. Safran, Y. Humblet, J. P. Ruixo, Y. Ma, D. von Hoff,
J. Clin. Oncol. 2004, 22, 1430.
Acknowledgements
Work carried out in the framework of the National Project
“Stereoselezione in Sintesi Organica. Metodologie ed Appli-
cazioni” supported by Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universi-
tà e della Ricerca (MIUR). The authors are also greatly in-
debted to the University “La Sapienza” and FIRB 2003 for
financial support of this research.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 297 – 302
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
301