T. Suzuki et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 6483–6487
6485
1) LiEt3BH, THF, -100 o
30 min, 98% (>10:1)
C
(MeO)2P(O)Me
(3.0 equiv)
O
O
(MeO)2CHCHO (2.0 equiv)
Ba(OH)2-8H2O (1.0 equiv)
OMe
E
TIPSO
TIPSO
6
P(O)(OMe)2
OMe
THF, rt, 30 min, 95%
n
-BuLi (2.5 equiv)
2) HCO2H (0.4 %)
hexane, rt, 2 d, 67%
THF, -78 oC, 2 h, 91%
OTBS
OTBS
12
13
1) Ac2O, Py, DMAP
CH2Cl2, rt, 2 h, 83%
2) NaBH4, MeOH
OAc
OH
H
H
OAc
CO2Me
MeO2CCH2COC2H5
(5.0 equiv)
Cs2CO3 (4.8 equiv)
H
H
H
H
TIPSO
TIPSO
TIPSO
CHO
oC, 30 min, 82%
I
0
H
H
H
O
OTBS
OTBS
OTBS
CH3CN/THF (2/1)
reflux, 64%
3) PPh3, I2, imidazole
CH3CN / Et2O (2 / 1)
rt, 11 h, 90%
H
H
H
14
15
16
OAc
OAc
OAc
CO2Me
O
CO2Me
CO2Me
H
H
H
(PhSeO)2O (2.0 equiv)
SO3-py (2.1 equiv)
H
H
H
H
H
TIPSO
TIPSO
TIPSO
H
H
H
+
O
O
TEA (5.3 equiv)
THF, rt, 2 d
OTBS
OTBS
OTBS
H
H
H
H
H
17
18a 50%
18b 9%
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 18b.
fully provided the desired alcohol (98%) with high dia-
stereoselectivity (>10:1), which was well explained by
the Felkin model.
The plausible transition state models are proposed in
Figure 2, which could explain the diastereoselectivity
of the IMHDA reaction of 17. Considering the A1,3
-
strain existing in 17, we believe that the three transition
state models, TS-1, TS-2, and TS-3, are important. TS-1
could be more stable than TS-2 because the steric strain
shown in Figure 2. Transition states derived from 17E
would be limited to TS-3 because two A1,3-strains arose
from the trisubstituted alkenes. The transition state
models proposed in Figure 2 suggested that the product
18a would be derived from 17Z via TS-1, and 18b from
both 17Z and 17E via TS-2 and TS-3, respectively. Con-
sequently, the desired product 18b could be produced
from 17E.
Hydrolysis of the acetal in the product with 0.4%
HCO2H in hexane generated the corresponding alde-
hyde, which underwent the IMDA reaction spontane-
ously to provide the desired product 14 as the single
diastereomer (67%). The stereochemistry of 14 was con-
firmed as that shown in Scheme 3 by the chemical corre-
lation with the compound derived from 11a.11
To construct the enone system incorporated in com-
pound 2, Knoevanagel condensation of 14 with methyl
3-oxopentanoate was first attempted, but no desired
product was obtained under any conditions. Hence, 14
was converted to iodide 15 via acetylation (83%),
NaBH4 reduction (82%), and iodination (90%) to exam-
ine the reaction with methyl 3-oxopentanoate. The
alkylation reaction of methyl 3-oxopentanoate with
the iodide 15 in DMF/THF (2/1) using K2CO3 formed
16 (24%) along with the O-alkylated product (35%),
but finally, use of Cs2CO3 in CH3CN/THF provided
16 (64%) and reduced the O-alkylated product (22%).
The E/Z ratio of the enone intermediate 17 in situ gen-
erated from 16 was unable to be determined because 17
was too reactive to isolate. Consequently, to collect the
information about the E/Z ratio of 17, compound 19,
lacking the alkene to be reacted, was prepared and sub-
jected to the same dehydrogenation conditions (Scheme
4). As a result, the E/Z ratio of enone 20 was found to
be 1/2.4.15 This ratio does not exactly correspond to
the ratio of 18a and 18b but suggests the diastereoselec-
tivity of the IMHDA reaction of 17 could be related to
its E/Z ratio. In addition, if the equilibrium between 17E
and 17Z exists under the conditions in Scheme 3 and the
IMHDA from 17Z is faster, preferential formation of
18a could be explained rationally.
b-Keto ester 16 in hand, introduction of the double
bond into 16 for the IMHDA reaction was examined.
Among the conditions surveyed, we found that use of
benzeneselenenic acid anhydride3 gave the best result,
causing dehydrogenation, followed by the IMHDA
reaction to provide 18a (50%) and 18b (9%).
In summary, construction of the ABCD ring system of
FR182877 via two intramolecular cycloadditions was
developed. The IMDA reaction of the a,b-unsaturated
aldehyde generated in situ from 13 provided the desired
product 14 as the single isomer and the subsequent IM-
HDA reaction was found to provide the CD ring sys-
tem. The diastereoselectivity of the IMHDA reaction
should be improved for further synthetic studies, but
the analysis of the transition states of 16 suggested that
the use of E-alkene for the IMHDA could improve the
diastereoselectivity. Consequently, next we examined
the IMHDA reaction of the substrate possessing the
The major product 18a was converted to the crystalline
derivative, and its structure was successfully determined
by the X-ray crystallographic analysis,11,13 indicating
that the structure of 18a was the undesired isomer, as
shown in Scheme 3. The minor product 18b gave no
crystalline derivative and the NOE experiments on 18b
did not determine the structure; however, the NOESY
spectrum of the derivative prepared from 18b success-
fully determined the structure of 18b as the desired
isomer.11