Angewandte
Chemie
ꢀ
Figure 2c, thus indicating that the films also have their
columns aligned parallel to the substrate. Aggregation in
solution that causes the formation of columns, which can then
be deposited by spin-casting, is likely to be responsible for the
good electrical properties of 1c.
Crystals of the parent HBC 1a were grown to investigate
the underlying molecular structure of the HBCs.[44] The
crystals were grown from 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene and shown
to include two disordered solvent molecules oriented over the
coronene core. The molecular structure of this HBC moiety is
shown in Figure 4a–d. The three intersecting pentacene
whereas the Cb Cc bond is relatively long. A strong contri-
bution from the radialene resonance would explain these
unusual bond lengths.
In summary, this study puts forth a new design strategy for
molecule-based electronic materials in which a nonplanar
rigid core is used. We prepared a new class of hexabenzocor-
onene that is readily substituted to form columnar liquid-
crystalline phases, and these columnar materials have good
electrical properties in thin-film transistors. Structures with
nonplanar aromatic units, such as 1, may be able to achieve
much higher mobilities than those available to flat hydro-
carbons because the p surfaces of contorted molecules can
approach each other and arrange themselves in very different
ways. Moreover, these molecules make interesting starting
materials for the synthesis of other topologically interesting
hydrocarbons by oxidative closure of the proximal carbon
atoms to form five-membered rings.
Received: June 20, 2005
Published online: September 20, 2005
Keywords: liquid crystals · molecular electronics ·
.
nanostructures · self-assembly
Figure 4. Crystal structure of 1a grown from 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene.
Hydrogen atoms have been removed for clarity. a) Face-on view with
[1] C. D. Dimitrakopoulos, P. R. L. Malenfant, Adv. Mater. 2002, 14,
99.
[2] M. Bendikov, F. Wudl, D. F. Perepichka, Chem. Rev. 2004, 104,
4891.
ꢀ
marked pivot points (magenta circles). The Ca Cb bond is relatively
ꢀ
shortand the C
Cc bond is relatively long. Side views are given in (b)
b
and (c). d) Side view of one of the acene segments extracted from the
crystal structure. The other atoms of the HBC are hidden from view.
[3] F. Garnier, Chem. Phys. 1998, 227, 253.
[4] G. Horowitz, J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 2021.
[5] H. E. Katz, Z. Bao, S. L. Gilat, Acc. Chem. Res. 2001, 34, 359.
[6] D. J. Gundlach, Y. Y. Lin, T. N. Jackson, D. G. Schlom, Appl.
Phys. Lett. 1997, 71, 3853.
[7] C. Reese, M. Roberts, M.-m. Ling, Z. Bao, Mater. Today 2004, 7,
20.
[8] M. M. Payne, S. R. Parkin, J. E. Anthony, C.-C. Kuo, T. N.
Jackson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4986.
[9] C. D. Sheraw, T. N. Jackson, D. L. Eaton, J. E. Anthony, Adv.
Mater. 2003, 15, 2009.
subunits contort into a zigzag conformation. This bending of
the acene core is visualized most clearly in Figure 4d, in which
portions of the structure have been suppressed to show only
one pentacene subunit of the HBC. Essentially all of the
bending is concentrated in pairs of carbon atoms that act as
pivot points (these are highlighted with magenta circles in
Figure 4a). A comparison of some of the bond lengths in this
HBC with those from the pentacene crystal structure[45] is
given in Table 1. One of the most interesting features is that
[10] H. Meng, M. Bendikov, G. Mitchell, R. Helgeson, F. Wudl, Z.
Bao, T. Siegrist, C. Kloc, C.-H. Chen, Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 1090.
[11] Q. Miao, M. Lefenfeld, T.-Q. Nguyen, T. Siegrist, C. Kloc, C.
Nuckolls, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 407.
ꢀ
the Ca Cb bond is short in the HBC relative to the pentacene,
[12] S. Chandrasekhar, Handb. Liq. Cryst. 1998, 2B, 749.
[13] S. Chandrasekhar, S. K. Prasad, Contemp. Phys. 1999, 40, 237.
[14] D. Guillon, Struct. Bonding (Berlin) 1999, 95, 41.
[15] V. S. Iyer, M. Wehmeier, J. D. Brand, M. A. Keegstra, K. Müllen,
Angew. Chem. 1997, 109, 1676; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.
1997, 36, 1604.
[16] W. Pisula, A. Menon, M. Stepputat, I. Lieberwirth, U. Kolb, A.
Tracz, H. Sirringhaus, T. Pakula, K. Müllen, Adv. Mater. 2005, 17,
684.
[17] A. M. van de Craats, N. Stutzmann, O. Bunk, M. M. Nielsen, M.
Watson, K. Müllen, H. D. Chanzy, H. Sirringhaus, R. H. Friend,
Adv. Mater. 2003, 15, 495.
[18] A. M. van de Craats, M. P. de Haas, J. M. Warman, Synth. Met.
1997, 86, 2125.
ꢀ
Table 1: Comparison of C C bond lengths between 1a and pentacene.
ꢀ
C C bond length [ꢀ]
1a[a]
Pentacene[b]
ꢀ
Ca Ca’
ꢀ
Ca Ca
–
1.44
1.46
1.42
1.38
1.45
1.43
1.35
1.43
1.43
1.40
1.45
1.42
1.42
1.38
1.42
ꢀ
Ca Cb
ꢀ
Cb Cc
ꢀ
Cc Cc
ꢀ
Cc Cd
ꢀ
Cd Ce
ꢀ
Ce Ce
[a] The atom labeling scheme is shown in Figure 4a. [b] The atom
labeling scheme of the pentacene skeleton is shown below.
[19] N. Boden, R. J. Bushby, J. Clements, B. Movaghar, J. Mater.
Chem. 1999, 9, 2081.
[20] Z. Wang, F. Dötz, V. Enkelmann, K. Müllen, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2005, 44, 1247.
[21] E. Clar, J. F. Stephen, Tetrahedron 1965, 21, 467.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7390 –7394ꢀ 2005 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
7393