Cyanide Ion Promoted Addition of Acyl
Phosphonates to Ethyl Cyanoformate: Synthesis
of Tertiary Carbinols via Tandem
Carbon-Carbon Bond Formations
Ayhan S. Demir,* Barbaros Reis, O¨ mer Reis, Serkan Eymu¨r,
Mehmet Go¨llu¨, Servet Tural, and Gu¨lu¨zar Saglam
Department of Chemistry, Middle East Technical UniVersity,
06531 Ankara, Turkey
FIGURE 1. Synthesis of cyanohydrine with quaternary carbon center.
(Figure 1, route A). The source of cyanide, furthermore, deter-
mines the type of protecting group on the hydroxyl functionality,
which is, most of the time, crucial for the sake of subsequent
transformations. Although this approach has been widely investi-
gated,1 other promising methods include a three-component
domino reaction that utilizes a cyanide source,2 carbanion
precursors, and an electrophile (Figure 1, route B). It is in this
way that two sequential C-C bond formations take place via a
cyanide ion promoted carbanion generation from a carbanion
precursor and its subsequent reaction with the electrophilic
carbon center. This sequence of reactions has an obvious
advantage over the traditional approach for the synthesis of
cyanohydrins with quaternary carbon centers.
The viability of an approach based on the use of acyl anions
obviously depends on the availability of these valuable entities.
Acyl anions are available though polarity reversal (umpolung)
of the carbonyl compounds and adds a dimension of flexibility
to a synthetic design.3 Although acyl anion equivalents were
traditionally obtained by functional group manipulation and the
stoichiometric strong base deprotonation of the corresponding
carbonyl compounds, recently impressive progress has been
made in the catalytic methods for the generation of these useful
entities.4 From this end, the nucleophile-promoted Brook
rearrangement of acylsilanes has been introduced as a powerful
and useful way of generating acyl anion equivalents in a variety
of C-C bond-forming reactions.2c-f,5 Recently, Johnson’s group
and then our group introduced acyl phosphonates 1 as acyl anion
precursors based on a nucleophile-promoted phosphonate-
phosphate rearrangement in the regioselective synthesis of cross-
benzoin products 3.6 In this transformation, the addition of
cyanide anion to acyl phosphonates 1 forms the intermediate
alkoxide 2a that rearranges to the critical acyl anion intermediate
ReceiVed May 12, 2007
New cyanation/phosphonate-phosphate rearrangement/C-
acylation reactions of cyanophosphate anion with cyanofor-
mate esters are described. Phase-transfer cocatalysts facilitate
cyanide-catalyzed reactions between acyl phosphonates and
cyanoformates to afford protected tertiary carbinol products
in good to excellent yields (74-95%). Ethyl cyanoformate
is used as a cyanide source and electrophile. The scope of
the reaction was investigated by using a number of benzoyl
and acyl phosphonates along with ethyl cyanoformate.
Representative chemoselective reduction of the product 5a
afforded ethyl 3-amino-2-hydroxy-2-phenylpropanoate (13)
in good yield.
The synthesis of cyanohydrins has gained much attention due
to the importance of cyanohydrins as a synthetic building block
for a variety of pharmaceutically desirable compounds.1 In fact,
these compounds have a dense functionality, the transformations
of which provide easy access to many other valuable functional
groups. Therefore, a plethora of methods has been devised for
the synthesis of these targets in a racemic and an enantioselective
manner. The typical method for their synthesis is the addition
of a cyanide source, in various forms, to the corresponding
carbonyl compounds in a single C-C bond-forming event
(2) (a) Mander, L. N.; Sethi, S. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983, 24, 5425. (b)
Crabtree, S. R.; Mander, L. N.; Sethi, S. P. Org. Synth. 1991, 70, 256. (c)
Brook, A. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1974, 7, 77. (d) Moser, W. H. Tetrahedron
2001, 57, 2065. (d) Linghu, X.; Nicewicz, D. A.; Johnson, J. S. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 2957. (e) Linghu, X.; Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 2534. (f) Nicewicz, D. A.; Yates, C. M.; Johnson, J. S. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 6548. (g) Schrader, T. Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 3, 1273. (h) Lettan R.
B., II; Reynolds, T. E.; Galliford, C. V.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2006, 128, 15566. (i) Mattson, A. E.; Bharadwaj, A. R.; Zuhl, A. M.;
Scheidt, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5715. (j) Portella, C.; Brigaud, T.;
Lefebvre, O.; Plantier-Royon, R. J. Fluorine Chem. 2000, 101, 193. (k)
Lefebvre, O.; Brigaud, T.; Portella, C. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 1941. (l)
Garayt, M. R.; Percy, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 6377. (m) Nicewicz,
D. A.; Yates, C. M.; Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2652.
(n) Tanaka, K.; Takeda, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 7859.
(1) (a) Gregory, R. J. H. Chem. ReV. 1999, 99, 3649. (b) North, M.
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2003, 14, 147. (c) Brunel, J.-M.; Holmes, I. P.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 2752. (d) Kim, S. S.; Kwak, J. M.
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 49. (e) Liu, X.; Qin, B.; Zhou, X.; He, B.; Feng, X.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 12224. (f) Fuji, K. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93,
2037. (g) Christoffers, J.; Mann, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 4591.
(g) Matthews, B. R.; Gountzos, H.; Jackson, W. R.; Watson, K. G.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 5157. (h) Ziegler, T.; Horsch, B.; Effenberger,
F. Synthesis 1990, 575. (i) Effenberger, F.; Stelzer, U. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1991, 30, 873. (j) Belokon, Y. N.; Green, B.; Ikonnikov, N. S.; North,
M.; Tararov, V. I. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 8147. (k) Belokon, Y. N.;
Green, B.; Ikonnikov, N. S.; North, M.; Parsons, T.; Tararov, V. I.
Tetrahedron 2001, 55, 771. (l) Gro¨ger, H. Chem. ReV. 2003, 103, 2795.
(m) Evans, D. A.; Sarroll, G. L.; Truesdale, L. K. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39,
914. (n) Okino, T.; Hoashi, Y.; Takemoto, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44,
2817. (o) North, M. Synlett 1993, 807.
(3) (a) Johnson, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1326. (b) Enders,
D.; Balensiefer, T. Acc. Chem. Res. 2004, 37, 534.
10.1021/jo0710073 CCC: $37.00 © 2007 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/23/2007
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 7439-7442
7439