Bisphosphinepalladium(0) Precursors for Cross-Coupling Catalysis
Organometallics, Vol. 26, No. 21, 2007 5231
PMePh2 give similar species in DMF at 60 °C.5d Thus reduction
to Pd(0) does seem to occur in some instances although the
species produced have not in fact been identified. Interestingly,
under the particular conditions of the latter study, reduction is
inhibited by bulky substituents on the phosphorus5d such that
reduction of even Pd(OAc)2 by monodentate phosphines be-
comes disfavored when the phosphine cone angle is ∼130°. This
corresponds approximately to the size of PEt3,6 and thus
reduction of Pd(OAc)2 by the bulkier phosphines normally
utilized in Suzuki cross-coupling reactions1 is problematic. For
instance, the commonly used PCy3, PMeBut2, and PBut3 have
cone angles of 170°,6 161°,7 and 182°,6 respectively.
Scheme 1
The question arises then, if one particular palladium(II)-
phosphine cross-coupling catalyst system is found to be more
effective than another, does the difference arise because one
phosphine is intrinsically superior, as is generally claimed or
implied? Or does the difference arise because more of the Pd-
(II) precursor is reduced in the one case than in the other?
Furthermore, in situations where, in spite of the addition of
excess phosphine, reduction of the Pd(II) is far from complete
such that the ratio L:Pd(0) . 1, say 100:1 or 1000:1, might the
major palladium(0) species in solution for some phosphines be
predominantly a less active species PdL3 or PdL4, depending
on the steric requirements of L? The importance of and
difficulties in identifying the true catalyst(s) in the plethora of
processes investigated has been explicitly recognized,1n,5g
although it may be an exaggeration to suggest that the “literature
has grown into a morass, with an endless list of hypothesized
or claimed true catalytic species”.1n
dibenzylideneacetone).3 In the case of Pd(dba)2 and Pd2(dba)3,
it was at one time generally assumed that the dba is completely
displaced or, if not, that it does not impede oxidative addition.
However there has now accrued ample evidence that alkenes
containing electron-withdrawing groups, including dba, bind
very strongly to Pd(0) and are not always fully displaced by
tertiary phosphines.4 Furthermore, for a combination of elec-
tronic and steric reasons, dba is found to actually inhibit many
oxidative addition reactions.4
Catalyst solutions are alternatively generated by adding a
phosphine to a suspension or solution of a Pd(II) compound
such as Pd(OAc)2 or PdCl2, sometimes in the presence of a base,
the assumption made being that the Pd(II) salts are somehow
reduced to Pd(0) compounds.1 Although suggestions of rel-
evance for a number of reducing processes have appeared for a
variety of palladium-based catalytic systems, there seems in fact
to be a paucity of careful studies establishing the usefulness,
general or specific, of any class of reducing agents. Indeed, for
most of the phosphine/palladium catalyst systems used, there
is little or no evidence that substantial reduction is effected either
rapidly or completely.
Indeed, although tertiary phosphines themselves may serve
as reducing agents5 and it has long been known that triarylphos-
phines in DMF reduce Pd(OAc)2 and Pd(OCOCF3)2 via the
corresponding bisphosphine Pd(II) compounds,4a,5b,d,e,f the analo-
gous halo compounds PdX2(PPh3)2 (X ) Cl, Br, I) are stable
with respect to reduction in this way.5a On the other hand,
unidentified but presumed Pd(0) compounds are formed when
Pd(OAc)2 and PdCl2 are treated with PBu3 in benzene and
THF,5c and reactions of Pd(OAc)2 with PBu3, PMe2Ph, and
However, as mentioned above, high temperatures and long
reaction times are often required to obtain good yields in
Suzuki-Miyaura aryl-aryl cross-coupling reactions. If one
hypothesizes that somewhat extreme conditions may be neces-
sary in order that a Pd(0) catalyst species be formed in
catalytically effective concentrations, then a mild and efficient
method to produce bisphosphine Pd(0) compounds unambigu-
ously would permit an accurate assessment of the relative merits
of various phosphines in the catalytic cycle. It might also result
in the realization of much milder reaction conditions for cross-
coupling reactions involving otherwise poorly reducible Pd(II)
precatalysts, a potentially useful development where thermally
sensitive functionality in cross-coupling substrates would pre-
clude the use of high temperatures for prolonged periods of time.
(2) For background references information on Pd(0) chemistry in general,
see: (a) Kudo, K.; Hidai, M.; Uchida, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 1971, 33,
393. (b) Kudo, K.; Sato, M.; Hadai, M.; Uchida, Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1973, 46, 2820. (c) Minematsu, H.; Nonaka, Y.; Takahashi, S.; Hagihara,
N. J. Organomet. Chem. 1973, 59, 395. (d) Mednikov, E. G.; Eremenko,
N. K. IzV. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1984, 2781. (e) Immirzi, A.; Musco, A. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1974, 400. (f) Matsumoto, M.; Yoshioka,
H.; Nakatsu, K.; Yoshida, T.; Otsuka, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 3322.
(g) Mann, B. E.; Musco, A. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1975, 1673. (h)
Otsuka, S.; Yoshida, T.; Matsumoto, M.; Nakatsu, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1976, 98, 5850. (i) Yoshida, T.; Otsuka, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99,
2134. (j) Ozawa, F.; Ito, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Yamamoto, A. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1979, 168, 375. (k) Negishi, E-I.; Takahashi, T.; Akiyoshi, K. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986, 1338. (l) Urata, H.; Suzuki, H.; Moro-
oka, Y.; Ikawa, T. J. Organomet. Chem. 1989, 364, 235. (m) Yoshida, T.;
Otsuka, S. Inorg. Synth. 1990, 28, 113. (n) Krause, J.; Bonrath, W.;
Porschke, K. R. Organometallics 1992, 11, 1158. (o) Tanaka, M. Acta
Crystallogr. C 1992, 48, 739. (p) Kirchoff, J. H.; Netherton, M. R.; Hills,
I. D.; Fu, G. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13662. (q) Amatore, C.;
Jutand, A.; Meyer, G. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1998, 273, 76. (r) Kuran, W.;
Musco, A. Inorg. Chim. Acta 1975, 12, 187.
(4) (a) Amatore, C.; Jutand, A.; Fouad, K.; M’Barki, M. A.; Mottier, L.
Organometallics 1993, 12, 3168. (b) Jutand, A.; Hii, K. K.; Thornton-Pett,
M.; Brown, J. M. Organometallics 1999, 18, 5367. (c) Amatore, C.; Carre´,
E.; Jutand, A.; Medjour, Y. Organometallics 2002, 21, 4540. (d) Amatore,
C.; Bensalem, S.; Ghalem, S.; Jutand, A.; Medjour, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 366. (e) Fairlamb, I. J. S.; Kapdi, A. R.; Lee, A. F. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 4435. (f) Mace´, Y.; Kapdi, A. R.; Fairlamb, I. J. S.; Jutand, A.
Organometallics 2006, 25, 1795. (g) Amatore, C.; Jutand, A. Coord. Chem.
ReV. 1998, 178-180, 511. (h) Shekhar, S.; Ryberg, P.; Hartwig, J. F.;
Mathew, J. S.; Blackmond, D. G.; Strieter, E. R.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3584. (i) Paul, F.; Patt, J.; Hartwig, J. F.
Organometallics 1995, 14, 3030.
(5) (a) Amatore, C.; Azzabi, M.; Jutand, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991,
113, 8375. (b) Amatore, C.; Jutand, A.; M’Barki, M. A. Organometallics
1992, 11, 3009. (c) Mandai, T.; Matsumoto, T.; Tsuji, J.; Saito, S.
Tetraherdron Lett. 1993, 34, 2513. (d) Amatore, C.; Carre´, E.; Jutand, A.;
M’Barki, M. A. Organometallics 1995, 14, 1818. (e) Amatore, C.; Carre´,
E.; Jutand, A.; M’Barki, M. A.; Meyer, G. Organometallics 1995, 14, 5605.
(f) Amatore, C.; Jutand, A.; Lemaˆıtre, F.; Ricard, J. L.; Kozuch, S.; Shaik,
S. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 3728. (g) See also: Knowles, J. P.;
Whiting, A. Org. Biol. Chem. 2007, 5, 31, who, in a very recent review of
the Heck-Mizoroki cross-coupling reaction, outline the problems inherent
in deducing the origin(s) of many palladium(0) catalyst systems.
(6) Tolman, C. A. Chem. ReV. 1977, 77, 313.
(3) (a) Takahashi, Y.; Ito, T.; Sakai, S.; Ishii, Y. Chem. Commun. 1970,
1065. (b) Ukai. T.; Kawazura, H.; Ishii, Y.; Bonnet, J. J.; Ibers, J. A. J.
Organomet. Chem. 1974, 65, 253. (c) Ito, T.; Hasegawa, S.; Takahashi,
Y.; Ishii, Y. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974, 73, 401. (d) Ishii, Y.; Hasegawa,
S.; Kimura, S.; Itoh, K. J. Organomet. Chem. 1974, 73, 411. (e) Rettig, M.
F.; Maitlis, P. N. M. Inorg. Synth. 1990, 28, 110.
(7) Hills, I. D.; Netherton, M. R.; Fu, G. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003,
42, 5749.