LETTER
Intramolecular Pauson–Khand Reaction of Aryl Enynes
2015
(5) (a) Blanco-Urgoiti, J.; Casarrubios, L.; Pérez-Castells, J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2817. (b) Pérez-Serrano, L.;
Blanco-Urgoiti, J.; Casarrubios, L.; Domínguez, G.; Pérez-
Castells, J. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 3513. (c) Perez-
Serrano, L.; Gonzalez-Perez, P.; Casarrubios, L.;
Dominguez, G.; Perez-Castells, J. Synlett 2000, 1303.
(d) Blanco-Urgoiti, J.; Casarrubios, L.; Dominguez, G.;
Perez-Castells, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 3315.
(e) Perez-Serrano, L.; Casarrubios, L.; Dominguez, G.;
Perez-Castells, J. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2602. (f) Perez-
Serrano, L.; Dominguez, G.; Perez-Castells, J. J. Org. Chem.
2004, 69, 5413.
(6) (a) Lovely, C. J.; Seshadri, H. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31,
2479. (b) Lovely, C. J.; Seshadri, H.; Wayland, B. R.;
Cordes, A. W. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2607. (c) Madu, C. E.;
Seshadri, H.; Lovely, C. J. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 5019.
(7) Congested systems arising from the cyclization of internal
alkynes and 2,2-disubstituted olefins were generally poor
substrates in this reaction. See ref. 6c for further discussion
of this issue.
(19) (a) Magnus, P.; Principe, L. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26,
4851. (b) Magnus, P.; Principe, L. M.; Slater, M. J. J. Org.
Chem. 1987, 52, 1483.
(20) The stereochemistry of the major cycloadducts was
determined either through NOE experiments, or in the case
of 39, by desilylation and comparison to exo-23, to which it
was identical.
(21) Selected experimental procedures and selected
characterization data. 4,6-Di-tert-butyl-2-(-3-phenyl-2-
propynyl)-2-propenyloxybenzene (19): Triethylsilane
(1.24 g, 10.7 mmol) was added at r.t. to a solution of 16
(2.0 g, 5.3 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) under a N2 atmosphere.
Then trifluoroacetic acid (2.43 g, 21.3 mmol) was added and
stirred for 20 min. The reaction mixture was quenched with
aq NaHCO3 and extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 ꢀ 10 mL) to give
a yellow liquid. The crude product was purified by flash
chromatography (hexane–EtOAc, 95:5) to give 19 as a light
yellow liquid (1.87 g, 98%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3):
d = 7.52 (d, J = 2.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.44 (m, 2 H), 7.30 (d, J = 2.5
Hz, 1 H), 7.29 (d, J = 3.0 Hz, 3 H), 6.11 (ddt, J = 4.6, 11.0,
17.0 Hz, 1 H), 5.55 (dq, J = 1.8, 17.4 Hz, 1 H), 5.32 (dq,
J = 1.8, 10.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.46 (dt, J = 1.8, 4.6 Hz, 2 H), 3.83
(d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2 H), 1.46 (s, 9 H), 1.38 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR
(125 MHz, CDCl3): d = 153.6, 146.1, 142.0, 134.0, 131.7,
129.9, 128.3, 127.8, 125.5, 124.0, 123.2, 116.5, 88.7, 82.1,
74.1, 35.5, 34.7, 31.6, 31.3, 20.9. IR (neat): 2959, 2870,
1451, 1225, 991, 755 cm–1. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + H]+ calcd
for C26H33O: 361.2526; found: 361.2538.
(8) (a) For a review of this area, see: Sammes, P. G.; Weller, D.
J. Synthesis 1995, 1205. (b) Also see: Jung, M. E.; Piizzi, G.
Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 1735.
(9) For another example of this abnormal regiochemistry, see:
Comer, E.; Rohan, E.; Deng, L.; Porco, J. A. Jr. Org. Lett.
2007, 9, 2123.
(10) (a) Shambayati, S.; Crowe, W. E.; Schreiber, S. L.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31, 5289. (b) Jeong, N.; Chung, Y.
K.; Lee, B. Y.; Lee, S. H.; Yoo, S.-E. Synlett 1991, 204.
(11) Belanger, D. B.; O’Mahony, D. J. R.; Livinghouse, T.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7637.
(12) Our initial explanation of this change was that bulky silyl
ether led to an increase in the reactive conformer population,
resulting in enhanced cyclization yields. In other words, the
silyl ether was serving as a type of steric buttressing element.
However, our subsequent experience with related substrates
suggests that this may be only one aspect that contributes to
the increased yield. We subsequently observed that
substrates containing a free propargylic hydroxyl group
were prone to several types of side reactions, and its
protection may lead to a reduction of these types of
reactions.
General Procedure for the Oxidative PK Reaction
(Procedure A): Co2(CO)8 (1.1 equiv) was added to a stirred
solution of enyne in CH2Cl2 and under N2 at r.t. The reaction
mixture was stirred for 5 h at r.t. The reaction mixture was
cooled to 0 °C before NMO (12 equiv) was added in three
portions at 30 min intervals and then left to stir for 2 h. The
reaction mixture was then filtered through a pad of Celite
and SiO2 (ca 1:1) and washed with EtOAc. After rotary
evaporation, the crude product was purified by flash
chromatography (hexane–EtOAc mixtures).
General Procedure for the Thermal PK Reaction
(Procedure B): Co2(CO)8 (1.1 equiv) was added to a stirred
solution of enyne in toluene and under N2 and stirred for 5 h
at r.t. The reaction mixture was then heated at 70 °C under
N2 for overnight. Workup and purification was identical to
Procedure A.
(13) For a complementary approach to this type of ring system
through the Pauson–Khand reaction, see: Mohamed, A. B.;
Green, J. R.; Masuda, J. Synlett 2005, 1543.
6,8-Di-tert-butyl-1-phenyl-4,4a-dihydro-3H,10H-5-
oxabenzo[f]azulen-2-one (22): The PK cyclization was
carried out according to the general Procedures A and B. The
enyne 19 (130 mg, 0.36 mmol) was dissolved in the
appropriate solvent (10 mL). Co2(CO)8 (136 mg, 0.40 mmol)
and NMO (460 mg, 3.93 mmol) were added according to the
general procedure. The crude product was purified by flash
chromatography (hexane–EtOAc, 9:1) to afford 22 (60 mg,
43% using Procedure A and 64 mg, 46% using Procedure B)
as a yellow solid; mp 160–162 °C. 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 7.46 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.40 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1
H), 7.34 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.30 (s, 1 H), 7.14 (s, 1 H), 4.67
(dd, J = 5.5, 11.5 Hz, 1 H), 3.91 (d, J = 12.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.76
(d, J = 12.8 Hz, 1 H), 3.54 (m, 1 H), 3.35 (t, J = 11.5 Hz, 1
H), 2.75 (dd, J = 7.1, 18.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.03 (dd, J = 2.8, 18.8
Hz, 1 H), 1.41 (s, 9 H), 1.35 (s, 9 H). 13C NMR (125 MHz,
CDCl3): d = 205.5, 172.0, 156.8, 146.7, 141.9, 139.7, 131.3,
129.7, 129.6, 128.3, 128.2, 125.3, 123.0, 76.2, 44.1, 36.9,
36.7, 35.2, 34.7, 31.6, 30.7. IR (neat): 2958, 1705, 1474, 758
cm–1. HRMS (ESI): m/z [M + Na]+ calcd for C27H32O2Na:
411.2295; found: 411.2266.
(14) Control experiments suggest the diastereomer ratios are
kinetically controlled, as the epimeric ketones do not appear
to interconvert upon heating in toluene, or on treatment with
Et3N, although at this point, we cannot rule out the
possibility of a Co-catalyzed epimerization.
(15) (a) Nicholas, K. M. Acc. Chem. Res. 1987, 20, 207.
(b) Green, J. R. Curr. Org. Chem. 2001, 5, 809.
(c) Teobald, B. J. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 4133.
(16) It is also conceivable that the ionization and reduction take
place prior to cyclization, and experiments to address this
possibility are currently underway.
(17) It is quite likely that the active complexes (number and type
of ligands) are not the same under oxidative and thermal
conditions, and thus the differences observed under these
two reaction conditions may not only be a result of the
temperature differences, but of the precise identity of the
active complex.
(18) (a) Thermodynamic study: Connor, R. E.; Nicholas, K. M.
J. Organomet. Chem. 1977, 125, C45. (b) Kinetic study:
Kuhn, O.; Rau, D.; Mayr, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
900.
Synlett 2007, No. 13, 2011–2016 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York