OMe);22 2.3 ] 108 M~1 sec~1 for Q~~ formed from duroquin-
one.1 The above values are not far from those determined in
this work (Table 2).
Discussion
The number of studied Q~~ is insufficient to consider the
correlation of 2k with the substitution in Q~~ in detail; only
1
some tentative conclusions can be made. The number and the
position of methyl substituents in Q~~ has only moderate
e†ect on 2k ; the value varies within the narrow range from
1
0.9 ] 108 to 1.8 ] 108 M~1 s~1 (Table 2). Notice that the
reported 2k value of 2.3 ] 108 M~1 s~1 for tetramethyl-1,4-
1
benzosemiquinone1 is not far from the values given above. At
the same time, substitution with more bulky alkyl groups,
iso-Pr and tert-Bu (Q~~-4 and Q~~-8), as well as that with a
methoxy group (Q~~-9 and Q~~-11), results in an evident
decrease in 2k (Table 2).
1
The reduced reactivity of methoxy-substituted Q~~-9 and
Q~~-11 towards the disproportionation correlates with the
outstanding antitumor capability of the corresponding
Q.10h12 Notice that two more very potent antitumor benzo-
quinones, 2,5-bis(carboethoxyamino)-3,6-diaziridinyl-1,4-ben-
zoquinone (AZQ) and 2,5-bis(2-hydroxyethylamino)-3,6-
diaziridinyl-1,4-benzoquinone (BZQ) were reported to
produce very stable Q~~ (2k \ 8.9 ] 105 and 4.6 ] 105 M~1
1
Fig. 4 The fulÐllment of the second order kinetic law for the decay
of Q~~ produced by pulse radiolysis of QH -1 (A) and QH -11 (B). A:
s~1 for AZQ and BZQ, respectively).40 The correlation
between a low value of 2k and the pronounced antitumor
2
2
1
1, kinetic trace at 431 nm; 2, linear plot according to the second order
capability of Q may be attributable to the fact that reactions
equation; conditions: 800 lM QH -1, dose, 15.2 Gy. B: 1, kinetic trace
2
with the participation of Q~~ contribute signiÐcantly to prob-
at 435 nm; 2, linear display of the second order equation; trace 1@ and
able molecular mechanisms of Q cytotoxicity.1,3 All other
plot 2@ are the same as 1 and 2 but with subtraction of the absorbance
owing to Q formed via the disproportionation of Q~~; conditions: 500
things being equal, the lower the 2k value, the higher is the
1
latter value. In conclusion, a low value of 2k can be con-
1
lM QH -11, dose 23.5 Gy. The other details are given in the Experi-
2
mental section.
sidered as a likely contributing factor for Q antitumor activ-
ity.
experimental error. Among other things, the use of a short
wavelength peak for kinetic measurements thus provides the
opportunity to increase the sensitivity of the [Q~~] determi-
nation by a factor of ca. 2.
The work was Ðnancially supported by the Deutsche For-
schungsgemeinschaft (grant 436Rus 113/245/0) and the
Russian Foundation for Fundamental Researches (grant
96-03-00103).
(2) In most cases there was no signiÐcant di†erence in 2k
between the systems where Q~~ was produced from Q and
QH . With Q/QH 1, 5 and 8 the moderate di†erence might
1
References
2
2
be almost compensated if the same values of the e of Q~~
1
2
3
P. J. OÏBrien, Chem.-Biol. Interact., 1991, 80, 1.
G. Powis, Free Radical Biol. Med., 1989, 6, 63.
A. Denmark and E. Cadenas, Free Radical Biol. Med., 1989, 7,
435.
obtained with Q or QH were used in the calculation of 2k .
2
1
However, in the case of Q~~-4 the di†erence in 2k remained
1
substantial even after correction, i.e. when Q~~-4 was produc-
4
5
P. Wardman, Free Radical Res. Commun., 1990, 8, 219.
W. Bors, C. Michel and S. Schikora, Free Radical Biol. Med.,
1995, 19, 45.
ed from QH , the value of 2k was found to be less by a
2
1
factor of ca. 3. As we observed for Trolox34 and Etoposide,35
the kinetic changes due to complex formation of phenoxyl
radicals with azide are small, but not insigniÐcant and may
therefore explain these di†erences.
6
7
8
9
M. C. Rath, H. Pal and T. Mukherjee, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday
T rans., 1996, 92, 1891.
I. Wilson, P. Wardman, T-S. Lin and A. S. Sartorelli, J. Med.
Chem., 1986, 29, 1381.
(3) Only with a few Q~~ could the values of 2k determined
1
H. Pal, D. K. Palit, T. Mukherjee and J. P. Mittal, Radiat. Phys.
Chem., 1992, 40, 529.
in this study be compared with those reported in the liter-
ature. Values from 8 ] 107 to 1 ] 109 M~1 sec~1, reported as
H. Pal, T. Mukherjee and J. P. Mittal, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1994,
44, 603.
2k for disproportionation of Q~~-1 at pH close to 7,1,37h39
1
and that for Q~~-12 (2 ] 108 M~1 sec~1)24 are in a reasonable
10 R. Pethig, P. R. C. Gascoyne, J. A. McLaughlin and A. Szent-
Gyorgyi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA, 1983, 80, 129.
11 C. D. Morgan, S. H. Combs and J. Everse, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol.
Med., 1995, 208, 294.
agreement with 2k determined in this study (Table 2).
1
However, reported values of 2k for Q~~-4 (7.5 ] 108
1
M~1 s~1)19 di†er greatly from those determined in this study
(note that in this case also the greatest discrepancy occurred
for the decay values at the two absorbance peaks). Further-
12 V. A. Roginsky, G. Bruchelt and O. Bartuli, Biochem. Pharmacol.,
1998, 55, 85.
13 P. Wardman, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 1989, 18, 1637.
14 J. Butler and B. M. Hoey, Free Radical Biol. Med., 1992, 12, 337.
15 M. Saran, G. Vetter, M. Erben-Russ, R. Winter, A. Kruse, C.
Michel and W. Bors, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 1987, 58, 363.
16 G. E. Adams, J. W. Boag, J. Currant and B. D. Michael, in Pulse
Radiolysis, ed. M. Ebert, J. P. Keene, J. Swallow and J. H. Baxen-
dale, Academic Press, London, 1965.
more it should be noted that the 2k determination reported
1
by Dohrmann and Bergmann19 was performed with solutions
containing signiÐcant amounts of organic solvents. Below are
given some more values of 2k reported in the literature for
1
disproportionation of Q~~ with structures similar to those
studied in this work: (0.7È1.8) ] 108 M~1 sec~1 for mono-
17 K. B. Patel and R. L. Willson, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans. 1,
CH X-substituted 1,4-benzosemiquinones (X \ Cl, Br,
1973, 69, 814.
2
J. Chem. Soc., Faraday T rans., 1998, V ol. 94
1839