32
S. Yan et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 28–33
b-loop of NS5B (Fig. 1). Furthermore, while HCV NS5B
contains 19 cystein residues, only Cys 366 is observed to
be covalently modified, suggestive of the high selectivity
and mechanism-based nature of the inhibitor 1.
In conclusion, isothiazole analogs were discovered to
be a novel class of active-site inhibitors for HCV
NS5B polymerase. The best compound identified has
an IC50 of 200 nM and EC50 of 100 nM, which are
30- and 20-fold better, respectively, over the original
inhibitor (1). An X-ray complex structure of 1 with
NS5B was obtained from a soaked crystal at a
Such a distinctive binding mode of 1 offers a clear in-
sight into the mechanism of inhibition for isothiazole
analogs (Fig. 1). Briefly, the incoming inhibitor (1)
pre-positions itself precisely into the primer site in prox-
imity to Cys 366 to enable the reaction to take place.
Consequently, the resulting ring-open structure is cova-
lent-linked with the ‘primer-grip’. Furthermore, it makes
considerable contacts with the C-terminus, b-loop, and
more importantly the active-site of the enzyme. The
primer-grip has formerly been shown to play a large role
in initiation of viral RNA synthesis.10,12,23 The biologi-
cal function of the C-terminus is related to the regula-
tion of polymerase activity.24 Collectively, this binding
mode of 1, and its related analogs, can be anticipated
to act upon the HCV NS5B polymerase by one or sever-
al of the following mechanisms alone or cooperatively:
(1) preventing proper positioning of the template, (2)
disrupting the suitable entry path of initiating rNTP
substrate for de novo initiation, and (3) locking the
C-terminus into an inactive conformation.
˚
resolution of 2.2 A. The structure revealed that the
inhibitor binds in the active-site and is covalently
linked with Cys 366 of the ‘primer-grip’. Furthermore,
it makes considerable contacts with the C-terminus,
b-loop, and more importantly the active-site of the en-
zyme. The uniqueness of this binding mode offers a
new insight for the rational design of novel inhibitors
of HCV NS5B polymerase.26
Acknowledgments
We thank Vesna Stojiljkovic for compound purifica-
tions; Vicky Lai, Weidong Zhong, Shannon Dempsey,
Heli Walker, and Daniel Bellows for performing biolog-
ical assays.
References and notes
The covalent binding of the inhibitor revealed by the
X-ray crystal structure explains several features of the
SAR. Thus, compound 43, with an isoxazole replacing
the isothiazole ring, cannot form a disulfide bond with
Cys 366 to achieve the same binding mode as 1 and is
therefore nearly inactive. The electronic properties of
the substitutions on the phenyl ring appear to affect
the IC50 by tuning the electrophilicity of the sulfur atom
on isothiazole ring. A stronger electron-withdrawing
group would likely make the sulfur more electrophilic
and thus more accessible to nucleophilic attack by Cys
366. This effect, along with other features such as hydro-
gen-binding ability, hydrophobicity, and an appropriate
molecular shape, may be essential for the desired bind-
ing mode, which in return results in the high potency
as observed from the SAR results.
1. World Health Organization: Hepatitis C—Global Preva-
lence (update). Wkly Epidemiol. Rec. 2000, 75, 18.
2. Memon, M. I.; Memon, M. A. J. Viral Hepat. 2002, 9, 84.
3. Manns, M. P.; McHutchison, J. G.; Gordon, S. C.; Rustgi,
V. K.; Shiffman, M.; Reindollar, R.; Goodman, Z. D.;
Koury, K.; Ling, M.; Albrecht, J. K. Lancet 2001, 358, 958.
4. Kolykhalov, A. A.; Mihalik, K.; Feinstone, S. M.; Rice, C.
M. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 2046.
5. Yan, S.; Appleby, T.; Larson, G.; Wu, J. W.; Hamatake,
R.; Hong, Z.; Yao, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16,
5888.
6. Yan, S.; Larson, G.; Appleby, T.; Ding, Y.; Hamatake,
R.; Wu, J. W.; Hong, Z.; Yao, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
7. Chan, L.; Reddy, T. J.; Proulx, M.; Das, S. K.; Pereira, O.;
Wang, W.; Siddiqui, A.; Yannopoulos, C. G.; Poisson, C.;
Turcotte, N.; Drouin, A.; Alaoui-Ismaili, M. H.; Bethell,
R.; Hamel, M.; L’Heureux, L.; Bilimoria, D.; Nguyen-Ba,
N. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1283.
8. Love, R. A.; Parge, H. E.; Yu, X.; Hickey, M. J.; Diehl, W.;
Gao, J.; Wriggers, H.; Ekker, A.; Wang, L.; Thomson, J. A.;
Dragovich, P. S.; Fuhrman, S. A. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 7575.
9. Harper, S.; Avolio, S.; Pacini, B.; Di Filippo, M.;
Altamura, S.; Tomei, L.; Paonessa, G.; Di Marco, S.;
Carfi, A.; Giuliano, C.; Padron, J.; Bonelli, F.; Migliaccio,
G.; De Francesco, R.; Laufer, R.; Rowley, M.; Narjes, F.
J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4547.
With a better understanding of the inhibition mecha-
nism, it then becomes important to see whether the
cell-based replicon activity (EC50) would match up with
the related enzymatic potency (IC50).25 The EC50s of a
few potent compounds are shown in Table 4. As expect-
ed, EC50s correlated well with the corresponding IC50s.
Moreover, all compounds have marginal or no cell tox-
icity. The 3,5-Cl2 compound 21 represents the most
active one, exhibiting an IC50, EC50, and CC50 of 200,
100 nM and 52 lM, respectively.
10. Pfefferkorn, J. A.; Greene, M. L.; Nugent, R. A.; Gross,
R. J.; Mitchell, M. A.; Finzel, B. C.; Harris, M. S.; Wells,
P. A.; Shelly, J. A.; Anstadt, R. A.; Kilkuskie, R. E.;
Kopta, L. A.; Schwende, F. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.
2005, 15, 2481.
Table 4. EC50 from replicon assay for the selected compounds
Compound
IC50 (lM)
EC50 (lM)
CC50 (lM)
11. Beaulieu, P. L.; Gillard, J.; Bykowski, D.; Brochu, C.;
Dansereau, N.; Duceppe, J.-S.; Hache, B.; Jakalian, A.,
et al. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 4987.
12. Powers, J. P.; Piper, D. E.; Li, Y.; Mayorga, V.; Anzola,
J.; Chen, J. M.; Jaen, J. C.; Lee, G.; Liu, J.; Peterson, M.
G.; Tonn, G. R.; Ye, Q.; Walker, N. P.; Wang, Z. J. Med.
Chem. 2006, 49, 1034.
1
19
20
21
32
41
5.9
0.9
0.3
0.2
0.5
1.2
2.0
2.9
0.22
0.1
3.4
1.1
100
202
145
52
42
81