812
E. Chapman et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 811–813
R4
NH
Because only modest variant selectivity and inhibition were ob-
served, a small collection of derivatives of this scaffold was
synthesized in an effort to increase selectivity and potency
(Scheme 1).8
R3
R3
R1
NH
N
NH
N
n
N
N
N
R2
Briefly, acid chlorides bearing R1 were added to the anion of
malononitrile and after extractive workup, the resulting product
was refluxed with dimethylsulfate (DMS) in 9:1 dioxane:H2O to
yield the vinyl ether derivatives after chromatographic purifica-
tion. These two steps could also be combined into one step by add-
ing DMS directly to the first reaction and heating to reflux followed
by extractive workup and chromatographic purification. Formation
of the pyrazolol ring was carried out by refluxing the vinyl ethers
with a hydrazine bearing R2 in ethanol followed by workup and
chromatography. Finally heating to 180 °C in formamide yielded
the pyrazolol-pyrimidine. Position R3 was introduced by reaction
with the corresponding acid chloride in pyridine. In the cases in
which R1 was a nitro containing aryl group, the molecule could
be further elaborated by catalytic hydrogenation of the nitro group
to yield the aniline followed by filtration and condensation with an
acid chloride containing R4 using three equivalents of pyridine in
chloroform.
N
N
n = 0, 1
N
R2
R1 = alkyl or aryl
R2 = methyl, phenyl, benzyl, 3-nitrophenyl,
4-nitrophenyl, or t-butyl
R3 = H, alkylcarboxamides, arylcarboxamides,
alkyl, or aryl
R4 = alkylcarboxamides or arylcarboxamides
O
HN
NH2
N
N
N
N
Positions R1–R4 (Fig. 1a) were varied giving a total of ꢀ100 com-
pounds to be tested against chaperonin ATPase activities. It was
discovered that substitutions at position R3 were not tolerated. Po-
sition R2 tolerated a methyl, ethyl, isopropyl or tert-butyl group,
but no aryl substitutions were accepted and the tert-butyl group
showed the best activity. At position R1, only aryl substitutions
were tolerated. While screening compounds bearing electrophiles
at positions R1 and R4, it was noted that despite only modest cova-
lent bond formation with one of the mutants (G32C, data not
shown), the incorporation of an acrylamide group or a chloroacet-
amide at R4 yielded increased potency versus the unsubstituted
amine. This guided the synthesis of a small collective of aryl and
alkyl substitutions at the R4 position, with larger alkyl substituents
showing greater potency up to a cyclohexyl group which showed
diminished efficacy.
EC3016
Figure 1. The variable positions used to generate the panel of small molecules used
in the present study is indicated in (a). A small molecule with excellent selectivity
for the I493C GroEL variant is shown in (b).
Inhibition of activity was seen for several of the mutant/molecule
pairs, but the most sensitive discovered was I493C, in combination
with EC3016 (Fig. 1b). This pair was further assessed in a collective
of standard GroEL assays, ATP hydrolysis (Fig. 2a) and the refolding
of two GroEL substrate proteins, bovine rhodanese and pig heart
malate dehydrogenase (MDH; Fig. 2b).
The combined chemical and genetic approach taken here to
generating a small molecule ligand that targets a specific geneti-
cally modified protein to effect selective activation or inhibition
of activity has been employed in a number of previous studies.
An early example was the use of FK1012 and FKBP to generate
chemical control of protein dimerization.10 The current work di-
rectly borrows from an approach originally taken with kinases,
where uniquely for a selected kinase, a specific ATP analogue
was identified that could fit into the genetically engineered ATP
pocket of the kinase to enable labeling of its specific substrates.11
Subsequently, inhibition of individual kinases was programmed
using similar approaches with genetically engineered kinase ATP
pockets and small molecule pyrazolol-pyrimidine inhibitors like
those employed here.12 Such combined chemical genetic ap-
proaches have been adapted to the molecular motors, kinesin13
and myosin,14 employing modified ATP pockets and N6-substituted
ATP or ADP analogues, enabling action of individual isoforms of
these machines to be recognized.15 The present study of the GroEL
chaperonin takes the same general approach as these earlier stud-
ies, that is, modifying the nucleotide pocket at the position adja-
cent to the N6 of ATP and using as a ligand a small molecule
pyrazolol-pyrimidine compound related to those employed by
Shokat and coworkers,12 to inhibit ATP binding by the GroEL ma-
chine. Here, instead of a single or, as in the case of some of the mo-
tors, two targeted sites, there are seven sites within a ring. Beyond
this initial study, the use of varying numbers of targetable variant
sites versus non-recognized wild-type sites, by virtue of forming
rings with mixed subunit composition, has already enabled inves-
tigation of the ATP requirements for activating the machine at the
level of a ring.16 The experiments presented here and in the recent
mixed ring study have been carried out in vitro, but they establish
the feasibility of using the combination of a small molecule ligand
The ATPase activity of wtGroEL and each of the mutants was
measured in the presence and absence of each of the pyrazolo-
pyrimidine derivatives in a single point, 96-well plate format.9
R1
N
N
R2
NH2
N
R1
N
N
R2
NC
OCH3
CN
O
N
c
a, b
d
R1
R1 Cl
H2N
CN
O
R3 NH
R1
N
N
R2
e
N
N
O
NO2
NH2
HN
R4
NH2
NH2
NH2
N
N
N
g
f
N
N
N
N
N
R2
N
N
N
N
R2
R2
Scheme 1. General synthesis of pyrazolo-pyrimidines used in the present study. (a)
NaH, malononitrile, THF, 0–23 °C; (b) (CH3)2SO4, NaHCO3, dioxane/H2O, reflux; (c)
R2NHNH2, EtOH, reflux; (d) formamide, 180 °C; (e) R3COCl, pyridine, 23 °C; (f) H2,
Pd/C, EtOH, 23 °C; (g) R4COCl, pyridine, CHCl3, 23 °C.