N. W. Johnson et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 17 (2007) 5514–5517
5517
application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2
1EZ, UK [fax: +44 (0)1223-336033 or e-mail:
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk].
for Tie2 potency. The alkylation of the imidazole adja-
cent to the naphthyl ring and incorporation of a C-2
ortho-aryl substitution to increase its torsion angle
relative to the imidazole resulted in a potent and selec-
tive Tie2 inhibitor. The optimized compound 23 showed
efficacy in an in vivo model of angiogenesis.
7. The homology model of Tie2 was generated in the
program MOE using the crystal structure FGFR-2
kinase (PDB code 1oec) as the structural template;
compounds 1–3 were manually docked into the
homology model based on the bound conformation
of SB-203850 in crystal structure 1a9u. Figure
depicts the manual docking model for compound 1 in
second-generation homology model of an active
2
References and notes
a
form of Tie2; this second-generation homology model
was generated in the program MOE using the crystal
structures of inactive Tie2 (PDB code 1fvr) and active
FGFR-2 kinase (PDB code 1oec) as structural tem-
plates. Figures were generated using the program
pymol.
1. (a) Jones, N.; Iljin, K.; Dumont, D. J.; Alitalo, K. Nat.
Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 257; (b) Tsigkos, S.;
Koutsilieris, M.; Papapetropoulos, A. Expert Opin. Inves-
tig. Drugs 2003, 12, 935.
2. (a) Lin, P.; Buxton, J.; Acheson, A.; Radziejewski, C.;
Maisonpierre, P.; Yancopoulos, G.; Channon, K.; Hale,
L.; Dewhirst, M.; George, E.; Peters, K. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 8829; (b) Siemeister, G.; Schirner,
M.; Weindel, K.; Reusch, P.; Menrad, A.; Marme, D.;
Martiny-Baron, G. Cancer Res. 1999, 59, 3185.
3. Sato, T. N.; Tozawa, Y.; Deutsch, U.; Wolburg-Buchholz,
K.; Fujiwara, Y.; Gendron-Maguire, M.; Gridley, T.;
Wolburg, H.; Risau, W.; Ying, Q. Nature 1995, 376, 70.
4. Ferrara, N.; Hillan, K. J.; Gerber, H-P.; Novotny, W. Nat.
Rev. Drug Disc. 2004, 3, 391.
5. Semones, M.; Feng, Y.; Johnson, N. W.; L. Adams, J. L.;
Winkler J.; Hansbury, M. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007,
17, 4756.
8. (a) Volkamer, K.; Zimmerman, H. Chem. Ber. 1969, 102,
4177; (b) Liverton, N. J.; Butcher, J. W.; Claiborne, C. F.;
Claremon, D. A.; Libbey, B. E.; Nguyen, K. T.; Pitzen-
berger, S. M.; Selnick, H. G.; Smith, G. R.; Tebben, A.;
Vacca, J. P.; Varga, S. L.; Agarwal, L.; Dancheck, K.;
Forsyth, A. J.; Fletcher, D. S.; Frantz, B.; Hanlon, W. A.;
Harper, C. F.; Hofsess, S. J.; Kostura, M.; Lin, J.; Luell,
S.; O’Neill, E. A.; Orevillo, C. J.; Pang, M.; Parsons, J.;
Rolando, A.; Sahly, Y.; Visco, D. M.; O’Keefe, S. J.
J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 2180.
9. Calculated dihedral angles for compound 23 using MOE
are; C-2 aryl to imidazole 65°, pyridine to imidazole 38°,
naphthyl to imidazole 66°.
10. (a) Biancone, L.; De Martino, A.; Orlandi, V.; Conaldi,
P. G.; Toniolo, A.; Camussi, G. J. Exp. Med. 1997, 186,
147; (b) Drabkin, D. L.; Austin, J. H. J. Biol. Chem.
1935, 112, 51.
6. Crystallographic data (excluding structure factors) for the
structures in this paper have been deposited with the
Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplemen-
tary publication numbers CCDC 646583 and 646584.
Copies of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on