Cationic Iridium(III) Complex Salts
Organometallics, Vol. 26, No. 24, 2007 5923
Chart 1. Chemical Structures of the Complex Salts 1-5
further purification. 2-Phenylpyridine and N-ethyl-3-carbazolecar-
boxaldehyde were obtained from Acros and used without further
purification.
Synthesis of the Phenanthroline Derivatives. The phenanthro-
line derivatives were synthesized according to a previous report.16
Synthesis of the Iridium(III) Complex Salts. All iridium(III)
-
complex salts [Ir(ppy)2(N∧N)]+PF6 were prepared by the same
procedure. Herein, only the synthesis of complex salt [Ir(ppy)2-
-
(phen)]+PF6 (1) is described in detail.
Complex Salt 1. The cyclometalated iridium(III) chlorobridged
dimer [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 was prepared according to literature methods.17
A solution of [Ir(ppy)2Cl]2 (0.079 mmol) and 2-phenylimidazo-
[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline (0.158 mmol) in CH2Cl2-MeOH
(30 mL, 2:1 v/v) was heated to reflux. After 4 h, the yellow solution
was cooled to room temperature, and then a 10-fold excess of
potassium hexafluorophosphate was added. The suspension was
stirred for 2 h and then was filtered to remove insoluble inorganic
salts. The solution was evaporated to dryness under reduced
pressure. The crude product was applied to a silica gel column and
eluted with CH2Cl2-acetone (15:1) to afford a yellow solid in 63%
yield. 1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO), δ(ppm): 9.15 (d, 2H, J )
8.0), 8.26 (t, 4H, J ) 8.0), 8.15 (d, 2H, J ) 4.0), 8.03-8.07 (m,
2H), 7.95 (d, 2H, J ) 7.6), 7.86 (t, 2H, J ) 7.6), 7.63 (t, 2H, J )
7.2), 7.56 (t, 1H, J ) 7.2), 7.51 (d, 2H, J ) 5.6), 7.05 (d, 2H, J )
7.2), 6.92-6.99 (m, 4H), 6.30 (d, 2H, J ) 7.2). 13C NMR
(100 MHz, d6-DMSO), δ(ppm): 167.5, 153.4, 151.0, 149.8, 149.1,
144.8, 144.7, 139.3, 132.9, 131.9, 130.9, 129.9, 127.7, 127.2, 125.7,
124.5, 123.1, 120.6. Anal. Calcd for IrC41H28N6F6P: C, 52.28; H,
3.00; N, 8.92. Found: C, 52.42; H, 3.32; N, 8.67. MS(LDI-TOF):
m/e 797.3 (M - PF6).
properties of 1-3 by anions and proton was investigated. For
comparison, two other cationic iridium(III) complex salts,
[Ir(ppy)2(L2)]+PF6 (4) and [Ir(ppy)2(L3)]+PF6 (5), without
the N-H group were also studied.
-
-
Experimental Section
Complex Salt 2. Yield: 57%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO),
δ(ppm): 9.25 (d, 2H), 8.16-8.26 (m, 6H), 8.06-8.09 (m, 2H),
7.95 (d, 2H), 7.86 (t, 2H), 7.51 (d, 2H), 7.43 (t, 1H), 7.03-7.13
(m, 4H), 6.93-6.99 (m, 4H), 6.29 (d, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz,
d6-DMSO), δ(ppm): 167.5, 157.8, 153.1, 150.9, 149.8, 149.3,
144.9, 139.4, 138.6, 133.2, 132.8, 131.9, 130.9, 127.8, 127.6, 125.7,
124.5, 123.1, 120.6, 120.2, 118.0, 113.7, 56.7, 19.2. Anal. Calcd
for IrC41H28N6F6PO: C, 51.41; H, 2.95; N, 8.77. Found: C, 51.21;
H, 2.66; N, 8.43. MS(LDI-TOF): m/e 813.3 (M - PF6).
Complex Salt 3. Yield: 55%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO),
δ(ppm): 9.21 (d, 2H, J ) 8.4), 9.05 (s, 1H), 8.41 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4),
8.27 (t, 3H, J ) 6.8), 8.05-8.17 (m, 4H), 7.96 (d, 2H, J ) 7.6),
7.87 (t, 3H, J ) 8.4), 7.70 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4), 7.53 (m, 3H), 7.30 (t,
1H, J ) 7.6), 6.93-7.07 (m, 6H), 6.30 (d, 2H, J ) 7.6), 4.50-
4.55 (m, 2H), 1.37 (t, 3H, J ) 7.2). 13C NMR (100 MHz,
d6-DMSO), δ(ppm): 167.7, 154.7, 151.0, 149.5, 148.8, 144.6,
144.4, 141.3, 140.8, 139.2, 132.8, 131.9, 130.8, 127.3, 127.0, 125.6,
124.3, 123.2, 122.8, 121.0, 120.8, 120.6, 120.2, 119.5, 38.0, 14.4.
Anal. Calcd for IrC49H35N7F6P: C, 55.57; H, 3.33; N, 9.26.
Found: C, 55.76; H, 3.55; N, 9.40. MS(LDI-TOF): m/e 914.3 (M
- PF6).
General Experiments. Commercially available chemical re-
agents were used without further purification. NMR spectra were
taken on a Mercury Plus 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. Elemental
analyses were performed on a VarioEL III O-Element analyzer
system. Mass spectra were obtained on a Shimadzu matrix-assisted
laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometer (MALDI-
TOF-MASS). UV-visible absorption spectra were recorded using
a Shimadzu 3000 UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometer. Photolumi-
nescence spectra were measured on an Edinburgh LFS920 fluo-
rescence spectrophotometer. Luminescence quantum yields of the
iridium complex salts in solution were measured with reference to
quinine sulfate (ΦF ) 0.56 in 1 mol L-1 sulfuric acid). The solutions
were degassed by three freeze-pump-thaw cycles. Photolumi-
nescent lifetime was recorded on a single photon counting
spectrometer from Edinburgh Instruments (FLS920) with a hydrogen-
filled pulse lamp as the excitation source. The data were analyzed
by iterative convolution of the luminescence decay profile with the
instrument response function using the software package provided
by Edinburgh Instruments.
Materials. IrCl3‚3H2O, phenanthroline, benzaldehyde, and 2-hy-
droxybenzaldehyde were industrial products and used without
Complex Salt 4. Yield: 65%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, d6-DMSO),
δ(ppm): 8.91 (d, 2H, J ) 8.0), 8.39 (s, 2H), 8.27 (d, 2H, J ) 8.0),
8.20 (d, 2H, J ) 5.2), 8.04-8.07 (m, 2H), 7.96 (d, 2H, J ) 8.0),
7.88 (t, 2H, J ) 7.6), 7.47 (d, 2H, J ) 6.0), 7.07 (t, 2H, J ) 7.2),
6.90-7.01 (m, 4H), 6.30 (d, 2H, J ) 7.6). 13C NMR (100 MHz,
d6-DMSO), δ(ppm): 167.5, 151.3, 150.5, 149.8, 146.7, 144.7,
139.5, 139.4, 131.9, 131.8, 130.9, 129.0, 127.8, 125.7, 124.5, 123.1,
120.6. Anal. Calcd for IrC34H24N4F6P: C, 49.45; H, 2.93; N, 6.78.
Found: C, 49.23; H, 2.72; N, 6.45. MS(LDI-TOF): m/e 681.2 (M
- PF6).
(13) For recent examples: (a) Bondy, C. R.; Gale, P. A.; Loeb, S. J. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5030-5031. (b) Chmielewski, M. J.; Charon,
M.; Jurczak, J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3501-3504. (c) Nielsen, K. A.; Jeppesen,
J. O.; Levillain, E.; Becher, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 187-191.
(d) Wallace, K. J.; Belcher, W. J.; Syed, K. F.; Seed, J. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 9699-9715. (e) Best, M. D.; Tobey, S. L.; Anslyn, E. V.
Coord. Chem. ReV. 2003, 240, 3-15. (f) Choi, K.; Hamilton, A. D. Coord.
Chem. ReV. 2003, 240, 101-110. (g) Mizuno, T.; Wei, W.-H.; Eller, L.
R.; Sessler, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1134-1135. (h) Haj-Zaroubi,
M.; Mitzel, N. W.; Schmidtchen, F. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
104-107. (i) Liu, Z. Q.; Shi, M.; Li, F. Y.; Fang, Q.; Chen, Z. H.; Yi, T.;
Huang, C. H. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5481-5484. (j) Zhou, Z. G.; Xiao, S. Z.;
Xu, J.; Liu, Z. Q.; Shi, M.; Li, F. Y.; Yi, T.; Huang, C. H. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 3911-3914. (k) Zhou, Z. G.; Yang, H.; Shi, M.; Xiao, S. Z.; Li, F. Y.;
Yi, T.; Huang, C. H. ChemPhysChem 2007, 8, 1289-1292.
Complex Salt 5. Yield: 50%. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3), δ-
(ppm): 9.30 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4), 9.14 (d, 1H, J ) 8.4), 8.24 (t, 2H,
J ) 4.8), 8.02-8.05 (m, 1H), 7.89-7.96 (m, 2H), 7.68-7.79 (m,
(14) Goodall, W.; Williams, J. A. G. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2000,
2893-2896.
(16) Han, M. J.; Gao, L. H.; Wang, K. Z. New J. Chem. 2006, 30, 208-
214.
(17) Nonoyama, K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1974, 47, 467-468.
(15) Xiao, S. Z.; Tao Yi, T.; Zhou, Y. F.; Zhao, Q.; Li, F. Y.; Huang, C.
H. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 10072-10078.