.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 2: Catalytic reduction of aryl- and monosubstituted epoxides
(conditions unless otherwise noted: [Cp2Ti(CH3)2] (5 mol%),
(CH3)PhSiH2 /1.5 equiv), 1m epoxide/THF, reflux, desilylation with aq
K2CO3).
Entry
Substrate
Product
t [h]
Yield [%]
1
16
83
2
3
14
36
79
82
4
5
6
7
16
18
16
18
65
68
81[a]
79[b]
[a] 78:22 mixture of 1- and 2-dodecanol. [b] RT, 80:20 mixture of 1- and 2-
dodecanol, [(tBuC5H4)2Ti(CH3)2].
Scheme 2. Reduction of cyclohexyl radicals by syn- or anti-selective
HAT. For computational details see the Supporting Information.
of ca. 80%. Secondary benzylic radicals (entries 4 and 5) give
slightly lower yields. 1-Dodecene oxide (entry 6) is opened in
81% yield with [Cp2Ti(CH3)2] as the precatalyst. In reactions
with [Cp2Ti(CH3)2] heating is necessary for reasonable
reaction times. Gratifyingly, the reaction can be carried out
at room temperature with [(tBuC5H4)2Ti(CH3)2] with essen-
tially identical results (entry 7). Thus, bulky catalysts are also
tolerated by our system and can even lead to improved results.
With an operating catalytic system in hand, we turned our
attention to the diastereoselective reduction of epoxide-
derived radicals. The postulated intramolecular HAT should
result in ordered cyclic transition states. For cyclic radicals this
leads to an unprecedented and highly selective catalytic
formation of trans products by means of a syn-selective
radical reduction[9] as verified by both computational and
synthetic results (Scheme 2).
Table 3: Catalytic diastereoselective reduction of substituted cyclohex-
ene oxides ([Cp2Ti(CH3)2] (5 mol%), 1.5 equiv (CH3)PhSiH2, in THF,
desilylation with aq K2CO3).
Entry Substrate
Product
d.r.
t [h] Yield [%]
1
96:4 22
96:4 16
80[a]
86[b]
76[b]
81[b]
2
3
4
96:4
4
94:6 16
[a] [(Cp2TiOC2H5)2] (2.5 mol%), RT, 0.17m epoxide. [b] Reflux, 1m
The computational study (Scheme 2, top) demonstrates
that the transition state for the syn HAT is lower in energy
than the transition state for anti HAT by 3.1 kcalmolÀ1. This
prediction is in excellent agreement with the synthetic
diastereoselectivity of radical reduction (syn/anti = 97:3;
Scheme 2, middle). With an external HAT reagent, such as
1,4-C6H8 (1,4-cyclohexadiene), the cis product is predomi-
nantly obtained by an anti-selective HAT. However, the
selectivity is disappointingly low (35:65; Scheme 2, bottom) in
agreement with the results of Giese et al.[7b] Thus, our concept
of an intramolecular syn-selective HAT through binding of
the HAT catalyst to the radical provides a unique opportunity
for controlling the diastereoselectivity of radical reduction.
The examples in Table 3 highlight the validity of our concept.
In reactions with aliphatic as well as aromatic substituents at
the radical center high yields and diastereoselectivities are
obtained, in the latter case, even at elevated temperatures. A
silyl protecting group (TBS) was tolerated.
epoxide.
merically pure or as 1:1 mixture of cis and trans isomers as
a substrate to investigate the influence of the syn-selective
HAT on this issue (Scheme 3). The [Cp2Ti(CH3)2]-derived
catalyst gave only a moderate diastereoselectivity of 85:15.
Introduction of bulky substituents resulted in higher selec-
tivity. With [(tBuC5H4)2Ti(CH3)2] as the precatalyst an
excellent selectivity of 97:3 was obtained even in refluxing
THF. Gratifyingly, with this system the highest yield of 10 was
obtained (82%), too. Moreover, our process is diastereocon-
vergent as exemplified in the reaction of 9 as 1:1 mixture of
diastereomers. The diastereoselectivity in the formation of 10
was the same as that observed for pure trans-9. This finding
demonstrates that after epoxide opening the intramolecular
À
HAT is slower than rotation around the C C bond adjacent to
the radical center. As an explanation for the high diastereo-
selectivity (Figure 1), we suggest that in transition state A the
interactions between the cyclopentadienyl ligands and the
An even greater challenge is the diastereoselective
reduction of acyclic radicals. We chose 9 either diastereo-
2
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!