Sulfur-Containing Phenolic Antioxidants
SCHEME 3
radicals. The enhanced activity as chain-breaking antioxidants
of phenols para-substituted with a SR group is, however,
substantially smaller than that of the corresponding p-methoxy
phenols. This result, together with recent findings36 on seleno-
tocopherol indicating that the replacement of the chromanolic
oxygen with selenium does not improve neither the BDE(O-
H) nor the kinh value with respect to R-tocopherol, suggest that
the chain-breaking antioxidant efficacy of phenols para-
substituted with XR groups decreases in the order X ) O > S
> Se. However, it should be emphasized that this holds for
initiated oxidations at low temperature, whereas spontaneous
oxidations proceeding more slowly or at higher temperatures
might be inhibited efficiently also by sulfur- or selenium-
containing phenols as a result of their ability to behave as
preventive antioxidants by decomposing hydroperoxides to
alcohols.
moieties. The same result was previously found by other authors
who performed similar measurements in cumene at different
temperatures.6 The presence in the ESI-MS spectra of the
products of reaction between 4 and AIBN of an intense peak at
m/z ) 285 (not shown) corresponding to a cleavage product in
which sulfur is oxidized to sulfate seems to suggest that, after
trapping two peroxyl radicals, the bisphenol 4 splits in two
fragments not capable of further inhibiting the autoxidation
reaction.
It is possible that the complex behavior of the investigated
sulfides may be due to the instability of the quinolide peroxide
formed by addition of a second peroxyl radical to the carbon
linked to the sulfur substituent (10, Scheme 3). This adduct,
characterized by the presence of two reactive moieties (-OO-
and -S-) close together, might be cleaved thermally giving
sulfoxides and sulfones and other products devoid of any
antioxidant activity.34
It should be emphasized that the n ) 3 value observed with
bisphenol 7 might be consistent with the above suggestion.
Actually, due to the reduced size of the methyl group in one of
the ortho positions, attack of the second peroxyl radical to the
primarily formed phenoxyl radical from 7 may occur not only
at C-4 but also at C-6, thus giving the analogue of 10 as well
as 11, where sulfur and peroxide groups are isolated. In fact,
11 could be identified by ESI-MS at 456 m/z by negative ion
detection mode.
The formation of sulfoxides and sulfones might arise, beside
from decomposition of quinolide peroxides such as 10,34 also
from direct reaction of peroxyl radicals with the starting sulfides,
as has been reported previously by different authors.35 Thus,
competition for peroxyl radicals between the phenolic OH and
the sulfur atom can give rise to stoichiometric factors shorter
than expected, as, for instance, the n ) 1.7 value found for
phenol 1 and n < 2 observed by Ingold and co-workers3 for
sulfur analogues of vitamin E. However, this competition is not
believed to be responsible for the abnormally small n coefficients
of bisphenols 4, 7, and 9, which are very similar despite the
large difference between the kinh values.
By investigating phenols 8 and 9, we have also been able to
measure the contribution of an ortho SR group to the antioxidant
activity of phenols and to evaluate the importance of the
intramolecular O-H‚‚‚ SR hydrogen bonding in determining
the properties of such molecules. The present data imply that
the intramolecular hydrogen bond of the phenolic OH proton
to the adjacent SMe group is weaker than that to an OMe group,
in contrast with DFT calculations carried out on a number of
ortho-substituted phenols.37
At variance with what is observed with SR groups, substitu-
tion of the para position with oxygenated sulfur groups does
not lead to any improvement (SO2R substituents) of the
antioxidant activity of phenols or only to a very small improve-
ment (SOR groups).
Some important points concerning the radical chemistry of
sulfur-containing phenols remain to be better clarified, in
particular the fate of oxidized products deriving from the
reaction with peroxyl radicals. It is worth to be noted that
product studies are only seldom reported in the characterization
of new antioxidants, although this piece of information may be
crucial for practical purposes.
Experimental Section
Matherials. Sulfide 1 was prepared by methylation 2,6-di-tert-
butyl-4-mercaptophenol with methyl iodide.38 The mercaptophenol
was obtained by LiAlH4 reduction of the corresponding N-
thiophthalimide.39
Sulfide 4 was prepared reacting 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol with
sulfur and potassium hydroxide in refluxing ethanol as previously
reported.38 Sulfoxides 2 (racemic mixture) and 5 and sulfones 3
and 6 were prepared from the corresponding sulfides by oxidation
with m-CPBA in dichloromethane.
2,4-Di-tert-butyl-6-methylthiophenol (8) was prepared by reacting
2,4-di-tert-butylphenol with sulfur monochloride to obtain the
isolable intermediate 2,2′-trithiobis(2,6-di-tert-butylphenol), which
was reduced with zinc in acidic conditions to give 3,5-di-tert-butyl-
2-hydroxybenzenethiol.40 This compound was treated with io-
Conclusions
The kinetic and thermochemical data collected in this work
demonstrate that the effect of p-thiyl substituents (SR) on the
antioxidant properties of phenol derivatives is that of decreasing
the bond dissociation enthalpy of the phenolic O-H bond and
of increasing the rate constant for the reaction with peroxyl
(31) BDE and kinh values have been taken from refs 13 and 18 for X )
H, Me, and OMe and from ref 33 for X ) CHdCHC6H3(OMe)2. The
equation of the regression line is BDE ) 91.34-2.80 Log kinh
.
(36) Shanks, D.; Amorati, R.; Fumo, M. G.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli,
L.; Engman, L. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 1033-1038.
(37) Himo, F.; Eriksson, L. A.; Blomberg, M. R. A.; Siegbahn, P. E. M.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2000, 76, 714-723.
(38) Neuworth, M. B.; Laufer, R. J.; Barnhart, J. W.; Sefranka, J. A.;
McIntosh, D. D. J. Med. Chem. 1970, 13, 722-725.
(39) Cantini, B.; Capozzi, G.; Menichetti, S.; Nativi, C. Synthesis 1999,
1046-1050.
(40) Pastor, S. D.; Denny, D. Z. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1988, 25, 681-
683.
(32) Amorati, R.; Ferroni, F.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli, L. J. Org. Chem.
2003, 68, 9654-9658.
(33) Amorati, R.; Lucarini, M.; Mugnaini, V.; Pedulli, G. F.; Valgimigli,
L.; Roberti, M.; Pizzirani, D. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7101-7107.
(34) Koenig. In Kochi, J. K., Ed. Free Radicals; Wiley: New York,
1973; Vol. I, pp 113-155
(35) (a) Fukuzumi, S.; Shimoosako, K.; Suenobu, T.; Watanabe, Y. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9074-9082. (b) Schoneich, C.; Aced, A.;
Asmus, K. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 375-376.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 71, No. 17, 2006 6331