6440
G. Righi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 6439–6442
were prepared: the R group was changed in order to evaluate the
influence that its steric hindrance and electronic effects have on
the reaction. In addition, to investigate the possibility of a broader
scope, different acyl chlorides were chosen: CH3COCl, CH3(CH2)8-
COCl (interesting for its long alkyl chain, which is found in many
natural products), and PhCOCl (interesting for the possible effects
of the phenyl group on the reaction).
verted into the corresponding aziridines 6a–c via a well-known
procedure.8
When all substrates were submitted to the same conditions
used the first time the reaction failed to prove reproducible and
very unsatisfactory yields were obtained (50% overall) (Scheme 4).
Besides the formation of the diprotected amino alcohol, there
always was a significant amount of monoprotected derivative
(30%). Moreover, compound 6c led to derivatives 7c and 8c both
characterised by the presence of the O-protected group in the ben-
zylic position instead of the allylic one. The reaction proved to be
regioselective nonetheless, and the regioselectivity seemed to be
driven by the peculiar reactivity of the allylic position for com-
pounds 6a and 6b, whereas for compound 6c the benzylic position
proved to be more reactive than the allylic one. The recovery of
monoprotected derivatives 8a, 8b, and 8c could be explained by
the insufficient amount of acetyl chloride in the reaction media.
Another possible explanation would be that not all the oxazoline
is opened during the reaction, but a small part opens during the
work-up, hence leading to the monoprotected derivative.
Therefore the reaction conditions were varied in order to iden-
tify the best suitable ones for the synthesis of diprotected deriva-
tives and the results are summarised in Table 1.
All the substrates were easily and in fairly good yield prepared
starting from the corresponding allylic alcohols 1a–c4 (Scheme 3).
An epoxydation reaction5 followed by an oxidation of the hy-
droxyl groups afforded epoxy aldehydes 3a–c. A subsequent Horn-
er–Emmons reaction6 yielded
a,b-unsaturated epoxy esters 4a–c,
the oxirane ring of which was then regio-selectively and stereo-
specifically opened, using a methodology recently developed by
our group,7 to afford azidoalcohols 5a–c, which were finally con-
When the aziridines were reacted with 1.2 equiv of CH3COCl
and Et3N as well as when the equivalents were doubled (Entries
1 and 2), the amount of diprotected amino alcohol and monopro-
tected derivative were, on average, 70–100% for the former and
0–30% for the latter, with an overall yield of 50%. It is also impor-
tant to note that in some cases it was possible to identify the oxaz-
oline in the reaction crude and to isolate it in very small amount
after purification. In both cases (Entries 1 and 2) the reaction led
to a complex mixture of products, failing to prove reproducible
and to give reasonable yields of the desired diacylated compound.
Interestingly, when aziridines 6a and 6b (R = propyl, cyclo-
hexyl) were reacted with an excess of Et3N (entry 3) it was possible
to recover the oxazoline as the only product even after purification
of the reaction crude, even though only in small amounts (40%
yield). However, these data are not reproducible: performing the
reaction on compound 6c (R = phenyl) only the correspondent pro-
tected aziridine was detected in the reaction crude. This has led to
the conclusion that the reaction evolves through very labile equi-
libria that are difficult to control so much to obtain only one of
the intermediates. What seemed more plausible was the possibility
to drive the reaction towards the last product, the diprotected ami-
no alcohol.
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (a) m-CPBA, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 3 h (85–90%); (b)
TEMPO, IBDA, CH2Cl2, rt 2 h or Py/SO3, DMSO, Et3N, CH2Cl2, rt 2 h (70–80%); (c)
LiOH, TEPA, THF, 70 °C, 2 h (85–95%); (d) BF3OEt2, TMSN3, CH2Cl2, rt 1 h (95%); (e)
PPh3, acetonitrile, rt À70 °C, o/n (90%).
Finally, when all three aziridines were reacted with 3 equiv of
CH3COCl and only 1 equiv of Et3N (entry 4), the diprotected deriv-
ative was recovered in a very satisfactory yield (70%). Therefore
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (a) Et3N (1.2 equiv), CH3COCl (1.2 equiv), dry
CH2Cl2, rt 3–5 h (50% overall).
Table 1
Different reaction conditions for the acetyl chloride mediated ring-opening15: results
Entry
CH3COCl (equiv)
Et3N (equiv)
Solvent
Overall yield (%)
A (%)
B (%)
C (%)
D (%)
1
2
3
4
1.2
2.4
1.6
3
1.2
2.4
2
Dry CH2Cl2
Dry CH2Cl2
Dry CH2Cl2
Dry CH2Cl2
50
50
—
—
70–100
70–100
0–30
0–30
Traces
Traces
Variable results
>95
1
70
—
—
Traces