928
HUIꢀPING CHANG et al.
BlGGT, ∆(581ꢀ585), and ∆(577ꢀ585), respectively. The
processed form was not detected in ∆(576ꢀ585), ∆(566ꢀ
585), ∆(558ꢀ585), ∆(523ꢀ585), and ∆(479ꢀ585), in which
the enzyme existed exclusively as precursor with f/fo of
1.18, 1.05, 1.23, 1.31, and 1.32. After autocatalytic proꢀ
cessing, the conformational changes of BlGGTs were
clearly demonstrated by the increase in frictional ratio of
the enzyme upon maturation (data not shown). The trunꢀ
cated BlGGTs with deletions of more than nine amino
acids from the Cꢀterminus could not induce the autocatꢀ
alytic process. Thus, the Cꢀterminal region close to Val576
is essential for the autocatalytic processing of BlGGT.
In summary, we have studied the role of the Cꢀtermiꢀ
nal region of BlGGT by deletion analysis. The mutagenꢀ
esis results revealed that deletion of up to nine amino acid
residues from the Cꢀterminal end of BlGGT definitely
affects the autocatalytic activity of the enzyme. Although
the sequence in the Cꢀterminal region is not strictly conꢀ
served among GGTs, these enzymes show a high level of
similarity in structure organization. Thus, the role of the
Cꢀterminal region proposed herein might also be true for
other GGTs, and this research also provides a starting
point for further studies of the quaternary structure of this
family.
Fig. 5. Quaternary structure analysis of the fullꢀlength and Cꢀterꢀ
minally truncated BlGGTs. Continuous sedimentation of the proꢀ
tein in 20 mM TrisꢀHCl (pH 8.0) was monitored with the analytꢀ
ical ultracentrifuge. The sedimentation velocity data were anaꢀ
lyzed with SEDFIT [28]. All enzyme preparations were at
0.4 mg/ml concentration.
The authors acknowledge financial support (NSC
95ꢀ2313ꢀBꢀ415ꢀ012ꢀMY3 and NSC 97ꢀ2628ꢀBꢀ415ꢀ
001ꢀMY3) from the National Science Council of Taiwan.
processed and the mature enzymes also retained GGT
activity (Figs. 4c and 4d).
EcGGT and HpGGT were reported to have hetꢀ
erodimeric structures [10, 12]. The quaternary structures
of parental and mutant BlGGTs were examined using
analytical ultracentrifugation, and the sedimentation
velocity data were analyzed using the continuous size disꢀ
tribution model using the SEDFIT program (Fig. 5). In
these experiments no aggregation was observed at sediꢀ
mentation coefficients of up to 20 S. Analytical ultracenꢀ
trifugation provides very detailed conformational inforꢀ
mation about enzyme structural changes. The parental
enzyme and BlGGT sedimented at ~4.85 S, and there
was a peak between 4.82 and 5.60 S corresponding to the
truncated enzymes (data not shown). An equivalent conꢀ
tinuous distribution C(s,M) plot (Fig. 5) indicated that
both BlGGTꢀ4aa and BlGGT have a calculated molecuꢀ
lar mass of approximately 65.23 kDa in buffer. Analytical
ultracentrifugation analysis verified the expected decreasꢀ
es in molar masses of ∆(581ꢀ585) (76.0 kDa), ∆(577ꢀ585)
(66.5 kDa), ∆(576ꢀ585) (60.1 kDa), ∆(566ꢀ585)
(59.0 kDa), ∆(558ꢀ585) (62.0 kDa), ∆(523ꢀ585)
(55.0 kDa), and ∆(479ꢀ585) (50.5 kDa). All these experiꢀ
mentally determined molar mass values are in agreement
with the theoretical values calculated from the amino acid
sequences. The parental BlGGT existed as a heterodimer,
and almost all the truncated enzymes were heterodimeric
in solution too (Fig. 5). This confirms that the active form
of BlGGT is the heterodimeric one.
REFERENCES
1. Brannigan, J. A., Dodson, G., Duggleby, H. J., Moody, P.
C., Smith, J. L., Tomchick, D. R., and Murzin, A. G.
(2006) Nature, 90, 4651ꢀ4661.
2. Tate, S. S., and Meister, A. (1981) Mol. Cell Biochem., 39,
357ꢀ368.
3. Hanigan, M. H., and Ricketts, W. A. (1993) Biochemistry,
32, 6302ꢀ6306.
4. Suzuki, H., Hashimoto, W., and Kumagai, H. (1999) J.
Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 6, 175ꢀ184.
5. Shibayama, K., Wachino, J., Arakawa, Y., Saidijam, M.,
Rutherford, N. G., and Henderson, P. J. (2007) Mol.
Microbiol., 64, 396ꢀ406.
6. Godwin, A. K., Meister, A., O’Dwyer, P. J., Huang, C. S.,
Hamilton, T. C., and Anderson, M. E. (1992) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 3070ꢀ3074.
7. Hanigan, M. H., Gallagher, B. C., Townsend, D. M., and
Gabarra, V. (1999) Carcinogenesis, 20, 553ꢀ559.
8. Oinonen, C., and Rouvinen, J. (2000) Protein Sci., 9, 2329ꢀ
2337.
9. Suzuki, H., and Kumagai, H. (2002) J. Biol. Chem., 277,
43536ꢀ43543.
10. Okada, T., Suzuki, H., Wada, K., Kumagai, H., and Fukuyama,
K. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 6471ꢀ6476.
11. Okada, T., Suzuki, H., Wada, K., Kumagai, H., and
Fukuyama, K. (2007) J. Biol. Chem., 282, 2433ꢀ2439.
12. Boanca, G., Sand, A., and Barycki, J. J. (2006) J. Biol.
Chem., 281, 19029ꢀ19037.
Significant mature form with a frictional ratio (f/fo) of
1.58, 1.57, 1.46, and 1.39 was detected with BlGGTꢀ4aa,
BIOCHEMISTRY (Moscow) Vol. 75 No. 7 2010